Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchLuckWillKillU
I love how the OP throws around terms while not understanding them , making assumptions based on thin air and asking for opinions while he's not open to being wrong .
My friend, why do you love something that is not true? If I don't understand something, I ask for explanation. I actually don't think I misunderstand any of the terms I used. I might be misusing the terms or putting too much emphasis on something that is not applicable in this concrete case, but i believe I understand the terms I use.
What's wrong with making assumptions and challenging opinions? And what do you even mean by assumptions, man? Isn't poker mostly based on assumptions? If it wasn't, there would be no reaon or need for opinions. Plus, what is wrong with my assumptions? Are they not valid at all? I tried my best BTW not to base them on thin air.
I am always happy to accept the fact that I am wrong. I am not ideal, neither is any other poker player. I wouldn't even post if I didn't think I was wrong in many cases. But in this concrete case, I don't agree folding is 100% mandatory. That's it
Please don't take my disagreement for an abuse. This is just a discussion.