Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***Official Stars Regs Thread*** ***Official Stars Regs Thread***

08-16-2008 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOMG_RIGGED!
they're awful and just as easy to make money from
QFT
08-16-2008 , 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
QFT
You mean like this?

Poker Stars $5/$10 Limit Hold'em - 6 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

Pre Flop: makimaki is BTN with T T
1 fold, chezlaw raises, 1 fold, makimaki 3-bets, some fish calls, 1 fold, chezlaw caps!, makimaki calls, some fish calls

Flop: (13 SB) Q T 2 (3 players)
some fish bets, chezlaw raises, makimaki 3-bets, some fish caps!, chezlaw calls, makimaki calls

Turn: (12.5 BB) 8 (3 players)
some fish bets, chezlaw calls, makimaki raises, some fish 3-bets, chezlaw calls, makimaki caps!, some fish calls, chezlaw calls

River: (24.5 BB) 7 (3 players)
some fish checks, chezlaw checks, makimaki checks

Spoiler:
Final Pot: 24.5 BB
some fish shows Td Qs (two pair, Queens and Tens)
chezlaw mucks Ad Kc
makimaki shows Ts Th (three of a kind, Tens)
makimaki wins 24.2 BB
(Rake: $3.00)
08-16-2008 , 04:32 PM
thanks mate
08-16-2008 , 04:32 PM
lozlz at your river check
08-16-2008 , 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOMG_RIGGED!
lozlz at your river check
Seriously.
08-16-2008 , 05:45 PM
yes i know. i was shell shocked from losing like 2 buyins to some fish, who was playing any two sooted cards and capped all his flush draws and always got there on the river.
08-16-2008 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
thanks mate
see they're all lolling at me anyways, the joke is on me. but for the record i'm no nit, i'm loose-weak.
08-17-2008 , 01:04 AM
Jstyal - If he's one of you. Good work counting your outs.
08-17-2008 , 01:50 PM
kallvestor - One spewy LAGTAG I'm happy to see losing in my database.
08-18-2008 , 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolution
kallvestor - One spewy LAGTAG I'm happy to see losing in my database.

Really? I always seem to remember him being a nit. I don't have my database in front of me right now to check though.

I am playing on stars more now to get my reload boner cleared.
08-18-2008 , 11:12 AM
He's definitely not a nit against me. He raises any pair on any street against me and doesn't fold. I prefer not to have him at my tables though.
08-24-2008 , 01:09 AM
Anybody play flair66? Seems like a spewy bad LAG.
08-28-2008 , 01:35 AM
Any thoughts on me now that I've put in a month on Stars? Playing mostly 2/4 with a spattering on 3/6 lately. Don't know that I've run in to many of you at all except for Scorcho but let me have your thoughts if you have em/want to let me know. SN is ericp88.

Don't know if it's accurate at all, but it seems to me there are less decent regs at 2/4 than there were at 1/2 which doesn't seem right to me unless people are skipping 2/4 altogether or the high rake at 1/2 keeps people there longer. Am I crazy?
08-28-2008 , 03:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrictlyStrategy
ffs suitedkings is playing 15-30 SH now?

lllllllllololololololll

This guy was something like 11/6/terrible in FR at 5-10 and afaik I have a higher WR vs. him than anyone else(including 1-2 ubertablers etc.)

He is TERRIBLE

EDIT: 10/7 and down 380BB over 13k hands, without an upswing higher than 40BB.

What makes these people think they should play? I heard him say once "I'm down 30,000 this year but i dont give a damn, im making SNE"

Doin it 4 da FPPs



Wow. Suitedkings1 now plays 36/26/2.3 or so. Ridiculous turnaround.
08-28-2008 , 07:32 AM
suitedkings1 was/is perfektpoker on AP.

i spoke to him a few times. apparently he made a ton during the old party poker days playing like a nit in the bigger games, and he convinced himself that he was just that damned good. i ****ed around with him a lot.

he seems to be significantly better lately from what I've seen.
08-28-2008 , 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericishungry
Any thoughts on me now that I've put in a month on Stars? Playing mostly 2/4 with a spattering on 3/6 lately. Don't know that I've run in to many of you at all except for Scorcho but let me have your thoughts if you have em/want to let me know. SN is ericp88.

Don't know if it's accurate at all, but it seems to me there are less decent regs at 2/4 than there were at 1/2 which doesn't seem right to me unless people are skipping 2/4 altogether or the high rake at 1/2 keeps people there longer. Am I crazy?
I've found the opposite. There are a lot of TAG grinders at 1/2, but I really only think a few of them know what they are doing and most of those are moving up now. At 2/4 I find I really have to start table selecting because there are some good TAGs/LAGTAGs that I want to avoid unless the table is good otherwise.
08-28-2008 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolution
I've found the opposite. There are a lot of TAG grinders at 1/2, but I really only think a few of them know what they are doing and most of those are moving up now. At 2/4 I find I really have to start table selecting because there are some good TAGs/LAGTAGs that I want to avoid unless the table is good otherwise.
funny how every thinks this about the level they currently are beating. There is not a single person on the 5/10 tables who think is worth avoiding anymore, 10/20 The are a handful, and even the fish at 15/30 sending me running in terror
08-28-2008 , 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOMG_RIGGED!
funny how every thinks this about the level they currently are beating. There is not a single person on the 5/10 tables who think is worth avoiding anymore, 10/20 The are a handful, and even the fish at 15/30 sending me running in terror
You're probably right. Most of the guys who I avoided a 1/2 are moving up with me.
08-28-2008 , 12:13 PM
using a 200 BB bankroll requirement, it has now taken me about 1 1/2 months to beat the following SH levels at PS

0.02/.04, 0.05/.10, 0.10/.20, .25/.50, 0.50/1, 1/2.

and i only play in my spare time, like an hour a day, one or two tabling.

ladies and gentleman, yes, you can move your way up out of rake hell.

$10-->$10K right on schedule.
08-28-2008 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Karnage
using a 200 BB bankroll requirement, it has now taken me about 1 1/2 months to beat the following SH levels at PS

0.02/.04, 0.05/.10, 0.10/.20, .25/.50, 0.50/1, 1/2.

and i only play in my spare time, like an hour a day, one or two tabling.

ladies and gentleman, yes, you can move your way up out of rake hell.

$10-->$10K right on schedule.
how long have you been playing LHE? just curious because based on your posts you seem pretty competent.
08-28-2008 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tryptamean
how long have you been playing LHE? just curious because based on your posts you seem pretty competent.
well this is a psuedo gimmick account until my self banning ends tomorrow.

im kit cloudkicker. ive been playing for almost 4 years, winning for 3 1/2.
08-28-2008 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Karnage
using a 200 BB bankroll requirement, it has now taken me about 1 1/2 months to beat the following SH levels at PS

0.02/.04, 0.05/.10, 0.10/.20, .25/.50, 0.50/1, 1/2.

and i only play in my spare time, like an hour a day, one or two tabling.

ladies and gentleman, yes, you can move your way up out of rake hell.

$10-->$10K right on schedule.
edit: oh snap, it's you kit. n/m you've been around the block. Although, do you really plan on continuing with 200bb per limit? I doubt anyone could sustain that for very long.

Last edited by numbnuts; 08-28-2008 at 12:52 PM. Reason: sorry for ganking my post.
08-28-2008 , 12:49 PM
its a little different because he's only 1 and 2 tabling, but 200 bb is awfully low. I have 3 or 4 200 bb downswings every month
08-28-2008 , 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Karnage
well this is a psuedo gimmick account until my self banning ends tomorrow.

im kit cloudkicker. ive been playing for almost 4 years, winning for 3 1/2.
lol, i actually thought about asking you that since i recognized the tailspin character... so how come you are moving up through nano-stakes? some sort of prop bet?
08-28-2008 , 01:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOMG_RIGGED!
its a little different because he's only 1 and 2 tabling, but 200 bb is awfully low. I have 3 or 4 200 bb downswings every month
If you move down every time the bankroll hits 150 or 100 BB then there's no reason it can't work, but if you hit the next level and stick there until busto, then RoR is going to be substantial. Like, pretty near certain if the plan is to follow those rules until $1000/2000.

It may be very frustrating playing like 150 hands of $10/20, dropping back down for 3k hands of $5/10, then moving back up and playing 780 hands of $10/20, then dropping down to play 1100 hands of $5/10, dropping down to play 4500 hands of $3/6, moving up to play 7.2k hands of $5/10, than getting back to $10/20 again. As I demonstrate how to waste time on 2p2...

      
m