|
|
| Small Stakes Shorthanded Discussions of small stakes short-handed poker |
04-05-2007, 11:51 PM
|
#16
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: waiting for robusto
Posts: 1,839
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
Quote:
Chez,
I'm sure you know your vpip/pfr #'s aren't as high as a lot of the other reg's. If you don't mind sharing, to what extent has this affected your swings, tilt (or lack thereof)?
|
I never used to tilt at all but recently I've been very bad (under control again now I hope). I don't think the tilt is related to my vip/pfr but its sure been responsible for a downwards 'swing'
Its tough to compare swings with styles I don't play but arent they simply related to win rates, so if I'm a 1BB/100 winner (which I used to be ) then I swing much the same as a 30/20 1 BB/100 winner?
chez
|
chez,
care to share your vpip/pfr so i know what's considered "tight" these days?
|
|
|
04-05-2007, 11:51 PM
|
#17
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,867
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Vent:
I hate when people play mor than 5 tables @ 5/10.
reason:
There's often only 5-15 tables at one time. I hate playing with the same boring predictable TAG's who I barely profit off of over and over again. Makes for an uninteresting game. Poker is not only about making money believe it or not I also play for fun.
Here's a tip, stop being a pussy, learn how to play better poker and move up stakes.
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:03 AM
|
#18
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 15,554
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Chez,
I'm sure you know your vpip/pfr #'s aren't as high as a lot of the other reg's. If you don't mind sharing, to what extent has this affected your swings, tilt (or lack thereof)?
|
I never used to tilt at all but recently I've been very bad (under control again now I hope). I don't think the tilt is related to my vip/pfr but its sure been responsible for a downwards 'swing'
Its tough to compare swings with styles I don't play but arent they simply related to win rates, so if I'm a 1BB/100 winner (which I used to be ) then I swing much the same as a 30/20 1 BB/100 winner?
chez
|
chez,
care to share your vpip/pfr so i know what's considered "tight" these days?
|
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit
cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.
chez
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:08 AM
|
#19
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: waiting for robusto
Posts: 1,839
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
ok, at about 24/17 even i'm beginning to feel like a nit these days  .
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:10 AM
|
#20
|
|
See my coaching listing
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Math is the answer
Posts: 11,291
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit 
cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.
chez
|
What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:10 AM
|
#21
|
|
adept
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: all they want is a free ride
Posts: 1,165
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
DullSetSound, don't play any more
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:13 AM
|
#22
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: waiting for robusto
Posts: 1,839
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
DullSetSound, don't play any more
|
i think i remember you. did you have a chick in your avatar?
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:17 AM
|
#23
|
|
adept
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: all they want is a free ride
Posts: 1,165
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
yep. blue hair
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:21 AM
|
#24
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 15,554
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
Quote:
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit 
cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.
chez
|
What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.
|
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.
I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong
chez
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 01:01 AM
|
#25
|
|
See my coaching listing
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Math is the answer
Posts: 11,291
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit 
cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.
chez
|
What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.
|
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.
I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong 
chez
|
Well I guess I shouldn't say it's a losing style. You can win with it. Most of the people with those type stats in my big FT database, 1.5m hands, are losing and over all the group has a loss rate of .5BB/100.
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 01:27 AM
|
#26
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 15,554
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit 
cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.
chez
|
What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.
|
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.
I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong 
chez
|
Well I guess I shouldn't say it's a losing style. You can win with it. Most of the people with those type stats in my big FT database, 1.5m hands, are losing and over all the group has a loss rate of .5BB/100.
|
How does that compare to 30/20?
chez
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 01:30 AM
|
#27
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,060
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Chez, cardlogs and others:
Having v tight pf stats is +ev cuz it makes me try to take you off your blind and tilt when I can't.
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 01:31 AM
|
#28
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Passyunk
Posts: 20,166
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Cardlogs is never not playing. On the whole he knows what he's doing obv. He uses wa/wb in some weird spots though imo.
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 01:36 AM
|
#29
|
|
See my coaching listing
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Math is the answer
Posts: 11,291
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
21/16 and I've loosened up a bit 
cardlogs32 seems very decent and I notice he is 21/16 as well.
chez
|
What limit is this? 21/16 is very tight. If it's like 5/10, I'd have serious doubts about that being a winning style. Certainly not optimal IMO.
|
Limits 3/6 to 10/20, mainly 5/10
I believe you're wrong about it not being a winning style but right about it not being optimal.
I'm trying to loosen up but if that fails I'll dedicate the rest of the year to being tilt free and proving you wrong 
chez
|
Well I guess I shouldn't say it's a losing style. You can win with it. Most of the people with those type stats in my big FT database, 1.5m hands, are losing and over all the group has a loss rate of .5BB/100.
|
How does that compare to 30/20?
chez
|
Edit: I'll open the database and post the numbers exactly.
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 01:59 AM
|
#30
|
|
See my coaching listing
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Math is the answer
Posts: 11,291
|
Re: ***Official Stars Regs Thread***
meh I have a bad memory.
Filtered for 4-6 handed
21/16 - -.90
26/18 - -.03
30/20 - -.63
36/20 - +.04
40/20/>2AF - -.02
40/20/<2AF - -1.18
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.
|