Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***Official Stars Regs Thread*** ***Official Stars Regs Thread***

01-26-2015 , 03:47 PM
Hi Guys

Any player have noticed a serious down of Limit traffic with new Stars client?

I posted in that thread and hope something can be done ;otherwise is the dead of Limt on Stars in a near future.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/23...5/index56.html

Thanks
01-29-2015 , 12:11 PM
I'll be making a case with PS to add LHE as an option at Quick Seat selection.
In order to do that, I would need some (really) good arguments, so... Anything that comes up in your mind guys, please share.

Regarding LHE being the default option when someone installs PS client... I was told that LHE wasn't the default for many years now, even though it was the first tab in PS6. I'm actually glad that Limit Hold'em is 2nd option right after No Limit and before PLO in PS7. It could be worse lol.
02-06-2015 , 02:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChawkDee
  • I've reported collusion many times in the past.
  • They did very thorough investigation.
  • PS are by a long way the best site for security.
  • Twice they refunded $ into my account.
  • Most times they can't prove collusion but keep the players marked.
Collusion is a major problem. It is almost impossible to prove collusion is taking place unless it is beyond transparent. Cheaters are well aware of the security measures taken against them, and they adjust their actions accordingly.

CaptainCrazo
02-07-2015 , 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreySteel
I'll be making a case with PS to add LHE as an option at Quick Seat selection.
In order to do that, I would need some (really) good arguments, so... Anything that comes up in your mind guys, please share.

.
How about... every decision they make favours no-limit. I'm a low stakes Supernova and I get forced to play a no-limit tourney as a big chunk of my rakeback (the quarterly "freeroll"). Every time we've asked for a concession they say they can't favour one game over another yet every single promo is tailored to no-limit holdem. They introduce spin and go's and suddenly it's ok to spam the lobby and login screen with this new (huge rake) no-limit game. You really need a reason to add limit holdem (one of the oldest forms of poker) to the first screen a fish will see when they install the client?
02-07-2015 , 09:37 AM
Yes, I really need a reason
02-08-2015 , 06:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreySteel
I'll be making a case with PS to add LHE as an option at Quick Seat selection.
In order to do that, I would need some (really) good arguments, so... Anything that comes up in your mind guys, please share.

Regarding LHE being the default option when someone installs PS client... I was told that LHE wasn't the default for many years now, even though it was the first tab in PS6. I'm actually glad that Limit Hold'em is 2nd option right after No Limit and before PLO in PS7. It could be worse lol.
New depostiors funds last longer in limit games which means there is more time for their deposit to make it to the rake drop.

eg a new player deposits $50 and gets stacked within 20 hands at .25/.50 NLHE. the rake contribution will be lower than if that same player played 1/2 FLHE because they will play on average many more than 20 hands.
02-08-2015 , 07:36 AM
Hi

It seems some current SNE don"t chase this year ;and current reason i think is lack of games. Even if i think Stars not make a lot of $ with SNE rake it is still i think a loose of 50k$ even with 70% RB. And really don"t sure these guys go rake same amount on other games.
Less recs come play Limit induce less games running and if now it is too difficult to reach sne it is again less games running because many sne who made profit with RB don"t go.
Sorry if not very clear for all.

Last edited by dudu; 02-08-2015 at 07:44 AM.
02-08-2015 , 07:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Nemesis
New depostiors funds last longer in limit games which means there is more time for their deposit to make it to the rake drop.

eg a new player deposits $50 and gets stacked within 20 hands at .25/.50 NLHE. the rake contribution will be lower than if that same player played 1/2 FLHE because they will play on average many more than 20 hands.
+1000000000000000
08-07-2015 , 12:12 PM
with more regs starting to use script at highstake lhe. I was thinking maybe lhe need zoom? but since the 6 max format isn't as popular why not have like a 4 or 3 max zoom where you don't need as many players pool to start plus it faster pace?

      
m