implied tilt odds, fish

Those aren't real!

Go away. Poker is not for you. Major in law or business.

It is if you believe it.

tell this to Dr Emo

WTF?

Implied tilt odds are very, very real.

True dat Reggie Miller. It is now possible to earn 3.0 fppoints from closer than the 30ft range.

Change is also required for the enviroment and humankinds primary needs for survival.

Conclusion:

1) ENVIROMENT- Trade in Audi TT for Donkey All Wheel Drive
2) NUTRITION - No eating S..HH..I..T/3meals pe day and consuming milk to combat mankinds lactose intolerence.

Endorsed by LA PESTE Aka LA soPHRESH BEST BEFORE DEC.31/2009.
&
Dr. 175### [preflop AF 7.2 vs. 2_Basic] aka EASYLOVER 90210 [river AF 0.0(SNOB rating)] ....please leave ur message after the tone....beep...will contact u during regular business hours with a no reply.

U Can't Touch This....MC Sledgehammer!

I is a math major. And doing very poorly in it I might add!


Yes, I know. Lol, I've been there. It was a joke, but I should know better not to use sarcasm on the intertube. I did, however, put an exclamation point at the end of my sentence to make it sound like "omg, they're not REAL!"

It is funny how often people confuse what a mathematician does with the check-book maths done during a poker hand. Doing math with actual numbers? Not a key skill for a guy doing the real stuff.

Yeah, this is true. I rarely deal with numbers anymore. It's much more theory and proofs than anything. Accountants are probably better poker players than mathematicians cause they use numbers all the time. I always use random greek symbols that stand for other things.

Then play on Euro tables, imo.

digggnitty please reveal urself

HUHU 2/4 stars. me 200$ villian 80$, 25 minutes later me 237.5$ villian 0.
standard?
still getting used to this rake stuff...

so just looked at the stars rake structure : "Heads-Up: rake will be collected on '1-on-1' tables at a rate of $0.05 rake per $1.00 in the pot, up to a maximum of $0.50 rake per hand. Please note that the 'Heads-Up' rake schedule only applies at designated '1-on-1' tables, not for heads-up play at tables which seat more players."
so thats is why it is better to open up 6max table at these limits rather than sit at huhu table, correct?

Your rake experience is about right. Rake is MASSIVE. Imagine 2 hands where SB opens, BB defends, then folds the flop. $1.00 has just disappeared forever in about 20 seconds' time.

HU rake on 6max tables is even worse. It's capped at $1.00, but at least they rake the pot in $20 increments instead of $1 increments.

accountants suck at math big time
they need a calculator for any stupid operation
i also correct more accounting teachers than any other teacher imo

I can bonus points because not only was I a math major, I also worked as an accountant!

jerk

pic of zomg:

Nice going Hans!

Touche Buddah.

meh, sorry if I hurt your feelings

accountings are a big part of my studies. I just don't accept the lack of math knowledge by accountants. Seems like they handle numbers without acquiring any feel for it. I mean, they can't look at results and say if it looks right or not. they need to take out the calculator to verify. a math-oriented guy has more a feel for it and can say if the result looks right...

just my opinion.

Damn I have not seen the 3/6 games this fishy in a LOOONG time, plus I run goot. I'm on a couple tables with 3 players all with VPIPs over 45% on them.

Well, yeah, I agree with this statement. Accountants always need to double check. I can tell when doing stuff that it doesn't look right or that something is off.

accounting is the field that the not-so-great mathematicians go into... kinda like the not-so-great law students work for the state ... and the not-so-great poker players grind for rakeback at the micros...

I can look at this post......and I feel........that you're a jerk, but I'm not going to verify it because it looks right to me