Originally Posted by that_pope
I really don't understand that from a stars business POV. Why would duplicating your resources to make two significantly different sites open be better for you than just keeping one open. Duplicating your overhead loses you the volume advantage.
Obviously I would be happy to get my money back, but logically I just don't understand it.
FYI lots of big companies are run just like this, when different brands that appear to be in competition are actually owned by the same crew.
Plenty of scenarios where both companies can benefit from such a relationship.
So its quite possible PS sees a +EV investment opportunity here for them, but ofc impossible to speculate too much when we dont have all the different terms and conditions in front of us