A lil lost in this hand. Villain's stats are: 20/18/55. 3bet%: 7%. Street betting %'s: 83/57/43. First cold-caller is 31/3/39. I raised flop to shut him out.
Thinking back, I think checking back turn or river is better? Most certainly bet/folding the turn I think.
At these stakes turn b/f is good since most villains doesnt semibluff enough to make a calldown profitable. You should bet since he could be drawing to a flush.
River bet is very thin. If you bet depending on villain some may fold better hands, some may call with a worse hand. But both of them target a very small range. I prefer checkbacking.
You should bet since he could be drawing to a flush.
The only pure flush draws, i.e. without any pair he has is probably AQ or AJ with a diamond. The rest is better hands that don't fold and worse hands that fold, imo.
I like calling the flop bet against this guy, he's not really got all that many combos in his range and it seems like on the turn he checks all his unpaired high card hands and continues only with pairs.
The only pure flush draws, i.e. without any pair he has is probably AQ or AJ with a diamond. The rest is better hands that don't fold and worse hands that fold, imo.
I like a turn and river check unimproved.
He is not going to fold any fd.
Also, If he calls with worse hands it is good. If he folds worse hands with 6-outers, it is still good.
Also, If he calls with worse hands it is good. If he folds worse hands with 6-outers, it is still good.
I think you misunderstood. Of course, no flush draw is going to fold.
But if you leave out all the flush draws (which are a small part of his range, imo), villain is not going to do what we want him to do with his remaining range (he won't fold better hands and will fold worse hands).