All you do is complain about the tone of people's posts here.

There are 102 different subforums here. PU is the only one that explicitly allows personal attacks and free-fire barbs. Yet, that is where you choose to spend nearly all your time on 2+2. Constantly complaining about the tone of the forum.

Of your last 250 posts, 247 have been in PU, 2 in SMP, and 1 in Politics.

Of your 41 threads started while on 2+2, 38 have been in PU, 2 have been in Politics, and 1 in ATF.

YOUR WHOLE EXISTENCE HERE HAS BEEN CENTERED ON THE ONE FORUM IN 102 WHICH ALLOWS THE TYPE OF POSTS YOU CLAIM TO DISLIKE.

You are insincere, a liar, and stupid to boot.

Your shtick has run its course.

If you hate the tone of the forum, then leave. If you can't leave on your own, the moderators here should finally show the sack and show you the door.

PS--I hope people who disagreed with me when I mentioned Chez and Co. in the Bad Posters competition have reconsidered. This forum is ruined courtesy of these ilk. They add no humor, no insight, no logic, nothing but a consistent stream of utter apologist bull****.

That is all. Please return to your AIDS fest.

Now that I have my new fun game of randomizing his posts and having them make just as much sense as they did in their original form- no way.

holy **** this guy is mad

I'm open to ideas on how we should deal with people that tard up the forum.

But it can't just be 50% + 1 of people don't like someone. And it can't be some sort of subjective rule that I (or some other small group of people) have to enforce.

Even more publicity and attention for the social justice issues in the forum. Thank you!

Oh and a honeypot as well. Let's see who posts what....

My suggestion is don't do anything. They're all easy enough to ignore should one choose to do so.

You want him to quit now? He's only a few hundred posts away from convincing Fly to never call anything racist ever again.

spank's no big deal now that he's not green and I can throw him in my ignore list.

Cytri's 5,000th post!

We don't need bad posters to go away.

We need good posters to stop responding to them.

Now because I'M responding to spank, that's clearly not the situation here, but people getting their ignore on WRT to DiB, Deuces and the less entertaining members of #TeamBruce would be swell.

I'd read 20 spank posts with glee. I hate even scrolling past ignored chezlaw posts.

I like the just ignore people approach. Even though I'm ****ing horrible at it.

Yes we need a Dids seal of approval system in this forum. Just look how well it worked in OOT so why not implement that here.

Spank and Swiss are easy to ignore because they have no control of the language they're trying to use. It's just word salad. Ignore 'em and move on.

Whats the point though? Are you here to just pat people that think the same on the back or are you here to discuss the issues from different perspectives?

I understand I can crush yawls anti-BruceX arguments but the timing of me going after local hero Mr.wookie and the creation of this thread screams partisan surrogate pain in the butts; not any legitimate social gripe. Politurding at it's finest .

How else can you justify overlooking FlyWf's and Dids' behavior?

I'm still shocked a bunch of so called liberals are not on board with a simple list of attributes that a person should not be targeted for in an adversarial social environment.

You wanna yell at people who write sentences differently in their mind than they see on a page, autistics, old white southerns, rural folks, and dick-sucking drug addicts-
ima first responder.

spank,

I'm about 3000 more of your posts away from resigning in shame as moderator. You can do it.

Overlooking FlyWf's and Dids' behavior, autistics, old white southerns, rural folks, and dick-sucking drug addicts, wow else can you justify for in an adversarial social environment.

Local hero Mr.wookie, pain in the butts, but the timing of me going after that a person should not be targeted.

Ima first responder at people who write sentences differently in their mind than they see on a page. I'm still shocked a bunch of so called liberals are not on board.

And the creation of this thread screams partisan surrogate yawls anti-BruceX arguments
Politurding at it's finest.

I understand I can crush with a simple list of attributes not any legitimate social gripe
you wanna yell.

Also:

You want to make racists a protected class. Most of us don't.

Then to top it off you attempt to paint obvious racists at not racist anyway.

Then you try and write off an agenda that looks more and more like somebody uninterested in limiting hate speech as some consequence of your occasional and timely nods to some disability.

Do what MrWookie did with DblJ. If someone is detrimental to discussions (of course not just of different opinions of other posters) 86 them from threads. Like spank in the PC-racist thread. He craps up the discussion.

I like Spank. Undecided on the rest of you.

I think my original stipulations (non-biased, can't just be a simple majority) apply to 86'ing from threads. Although I'm certainly open to a thread-by-thread type solution rather than just banning or not banning someone.

I don't think we should be banning people from threads in UNCHAINED. It should be on the users to self police and ignore people.