Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
It's important to note that letting those being attacked respond to those attacks isn't actually moderation. Keeping those attacked from responding is the moderation action. Since PU is supposed to be largely free of moderation, then the burden to show that the idea of not allowing those being attacked in a thread from responding is a good one should be on those who want that state of affairs, not the other way around.
It seems a lot of posters don't see a problem talking shyt about one another. Some say that's even why this forum was created. So we have it, and lots of it, in many different forms. Here are a few I see:
1) Straight smack face to face (in the same thread).
2) Smack behind the back (in different threads, often threads created for gossip). This means the butt of the joke must seek out the smack to respond.
3) Smack whispers behind the back (where the gutless gossiper doesn't quote the butt and changes the butt's na.me to make it difficult to search for if the hopeless butt cares enough to try)
4) And now the more recent, smack talk about people and duct tape their mouths, so they are unable to respond (at least in the same thread).
There are probably ways I'm leaving out. Seems sort of ridiculous to me that if we are going to allow people who enjoy revisiting various levels of K through 12 to gossip, smack talk and spread lies about one another, we should be trying so hard to make rules about how they do it.