If anything it seems like you're struggling to accept it. You're still talking about the election and ignoring all the quagmires that your chosen president has already found himself in in less than one week on the job. Allow me to help you move forward from posting like it's October 2016 up to the present day:

It's going to be four-plus years of watching Trump utterly fail at governing. Seriously, get used to it, this thread isn't going to get better for you.

So what is your goal, apart from posting fake news to make Trump look bad (which you had to later walk back)?

Like, this is the perfect example of what I'm talking about. The election was last year, Hillary killing Vince Foster doesn't matter anymore and doesn't make Donald Trump any better or worse as a president.

If anything, taking Trump's behavior and describing it as Hillary's behavior is a major insult to Donald Trump. You hate Hillary! You think she's a criminal! And now a quote describing what your president is doing is something you equate directly with her actions.

You're kinda making my point for me here!

I've posted several decidedly not fake articles that you will ignore because you are too embarrassed to defend your president, just as you refuse to in the main Politics forum.

After one week on the job TRUMP appears to he a very hard worker. Really not that surprising. One of the reasons TRUMP beat HRC in the election was that HRC just didn't campaign that hard. Obama basically echoed the same sentiment. Barack Obama, if nothing else, was a great and formidable campaigner. He connects with people. HRC is not in the same league as Obama as a politician. She ran an astonishingly horrible campaign. That on top of being an unmotivated candidate did her in.

Why do you keep talking about potatos?

You well know I answered your question in the main forum and you then proceeded to call me a troll in an attempt to get me banned.

I just thought you were talking about the Clinton foundation not Trump.

You can't be posting your fake news in this forum and think you're not gonna get called out on it. We have sharp people here! Stop with that nonsense please!

You did no such thing, and I did no such thing. Here is our exchange, in full:

It became clear after you didn't answer either of my last two posts here that you had no interest in discussing it, which told me everything I needed to know about you.

Too soon to evaluate the TRUMP presidency since he has only been there a week.

Can we agree that Melania is the hottest First Lady ever and Ivanka is the hottest first daughter ever?

I just wanted to get this out of the way.

You pester me for days on end with some questions about a topic that I previously hadn't even discussed.

Then I answered with my honest opinion on the topic.

Because my answer didn't satisfy your requirements you proceed to call me a troll.

That might have been unfair of me if those were truly your feelings, and if so I apologize. It just seems to me like "meh it's like calling an opponent a childish name" is a bit of a copout, ignores the fact that he's directly lying to you (which is quite distinct from childishly deriding someone as "Little Marco" or whatever), and ignores the fact that he's in a position of much more responsibility now that comes with accountability to the people.

But again, if your true feelings on the matter are seriously that you just do not give a **** if he lies to you because it just doesn't matter - okay, sorry for calling you a troll.

Ok

"People paying vast sums of money to join his Florida clubs and gain access to him is literally pay for play."

You read this sentence - which describes Donald Trump's actions - and thought I was talking about the hated Clinton Foundation. Again, this makes my point for me, he is so ethically bankrupt that you can't tell the difference between him and his political opponent that you think belongs in jail.

Prove you are a Christian to trump and you will get food.

I'll take Jackie Kennedy over Melania.

Mattis was confirmed 98-1 and Kelly was confirmed 88-11. A lot of Dems voted to cofirm them. Plus Mattis had to get a waiver and the Dems could have fillibustered that waiver. I don't know what the vote was on Nikki Haley but I don't think there was much opposition to her either. The inauguration crowd size argument is just noise.

https://antidotezine.com/2017/01/22/trump-knows-you/

tl;dr - idiots are really susceptible to bull****

+1

These are the idiots running the schools and teaching your kids.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/teacher-...t-trump-image/

This left has no common sense. Are you people a little bit embarrased?

http://www.nbc-2.com/story/34332067/...ter-trump-skit

Yep, extremely hard worker. Doesn't drink or do drugs, good family values. I can see why he generates so much animosity from the left because those are qualities they despise.


Yes on both accounts. Not only hot with great genetics, but Melania speaks 5 different languages so clearly intelligent as well. Again, being attractive and intelligent will garner hatred from the "pussy hat" crowd who are mostly fat and ugly.

Ivanka is a stone cold knockout as well with a beautiful family.

Somehow I got banned from the main forum for "racism" for pointing out that Melania was significantly more attractive than Michelle (who looks like a man). Projection much? LOL. I guess the folks over at the main politics forum are still a little tender from their loss.

Protestant work ethic is what made America great in the first place, I don't really have an issue with this.

Sosa, when you say a black woman looks like a man you are being a racist POS. Hope that helps explain why you can't play with the big kids any more.