Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
... I think my arguments were almost entirely consistent...
Sure. But nobody else did. About 90% of the posts were peeps trying to engage you into a productive conversation regarding the consistency, or lack thereof, of your arguments. But that never happened.
This reminds me of the ACer era.
Those fools would spew shiz that was unquestionably incoherent. The vast amount of the response was peeps trying to have a productive conversation regarding this incoherence. To a parent's basement dwelling man, the ACers reacted with spew about bias, and which 'team' folks are on, and support for the trail of tears, and loltastical misuse of the term 'cognitive dissonance', and tax==theft, and name calling everyone else as 'statist's.
What they couldn't do is make the jump from a conversation about their noxious alleged content... to... a conversation regarding the incoherence of their noxious alleged content. That was a bridge they could never cross... as for those fools, any bridge is a bridge too far.