Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Politics v7.0 Moderation thread Politics v7.0 Moderation thread

05-27-2017 , 04:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
the truth is i don't really care about the politics forums and let the mods do what they want. however, i won't let them ban people who actually want to use the rest of the site. those users can choose exile from this nonsense.

There is consensus that one of the mods is absolutely terrible. Pretty much every regular poster in this forum has at one point stated that Chezlaw is an abysmal mod, and I know I've stated it myself as well.

When the entire forum is continuously complaining about a single person that is causing an excessive amount of problems, you should do something about it if that person is a mod imo.

This forum would be a lot better with better rules and better modding. I would be happy to mod, and I'd be happy to suggest other people that might make good mods.
05-27-2017 , 04:51 AM
The mods in both politics forums are terrible and Mat has just said he doesn't care, so nothing is going to change.

Last edited by BroadwaySushy; 05-27-2017 at 05:04 AM.
05-27-2017 , 05:09 AM
tomdemaine is a good mod.

If Mat doesn't care, then replacing Chezlaw with another mod should be no problem. Pretty much everyone is saying he's got to go, and they've been saying it for a long time.
05-27-2017 , 06:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
the truth is i don't really care about the politics forums and let the mods do what they want. however, i won't let them ban people who actually want to use the rest of the site. those users can choose exile from this nonsense.
We take the same view here. We don't even temp ban posters unless they ignore timeouts (or otbc or sometimes previously banned posters)

The aim is to allow posters who break the rules of Pv7.0 to post elsewhere on 2+2 if they wish.
05-27-2017 , 10:14 AM
lol, chez still bootlicking even after Mat refused to defend him.
05-27-2017 , 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
There is consensus that one of the mods is absolutely terrible. Pretty much every regular poster in this forum has at one point stated that Chezlaw is an abysmal mod, and I know I've stated it myself as well.

When the entire forum is continuously complaining about a single person that is causing an excessive amount of problems, you should do something about it if that person is a mod imo.

This forum would be a lot better with better rules and better modding. I would be happy to mod, and I'd be happy to suggest other people that might make good mods.
Speak for yourself. I've never said Chez is a terrible MOD. I disagree with the pc rules. It can't be easy dealing with a bunch of whiney snitchy liberals. You guy's need to shut the blank up or get the blank out.
05-27-2017 , 11:01 AM
**** off Nazi
05-27-2017 , 11:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
**** off Nazi
That could be appropriate if I decided to start the Jews for Nazis movement.
05-27-2017 , 11:11 AM
I see you've been taking notes from TruthSlayer.

It's not clever.
05-27-2017 , 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
I see you've been taking notes from TruthSlayer.

It's not clever.
You're not allowed to talk about posters who can't defend themselves. It's very cowardly.
05-27-2017 , 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
You're not allowed to talk about posters who can't defend themselves. It's very cowardly.
You should learn to defend yourself.
05-27-2017 , 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
I see you've been taking notes from TruthSlayer.

It's not clever.
BTW...you spelled his name wrong.
05-27-2017 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
lol, chez still bootlicking even after Mat refused to defend him.
Lol

The decision to avoid banning posters from the rest of 2+2 as much as possible was mine alone. It's an attitude that I'd like to see in all forums, particularly ones where it gets heated. The more it gets adopted the better.
05-27-2017 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
BTW...you spelled his name wrong.
No, he didn't. While we're talking about making typos, any time you think you should use an apostrophe, just don't. Any time you have to use their/they're/there, just pick one of them and use it every time. Same for your/you're. At least you'll be right SOME of the time instead of getting it wrong every single time.


Also, in before "who care's?" and the appropriate response being "Obviously not you."
05-27-2017 , 09:29 PM
You actually bought a copy of "DUCY?"
05-27-2017 , 09:56 PM
Yah, yah, on the one hand it damages the twoplustwo brand, but on the other hand nobody buying a book isn't going to buy a book because of twoplustwo's politics forum. I mean, get real. The forums do suck hard, no doubt. Even some of the other forums are elitist. But, it really doesn't effect the book sales one iota. The only thing that would truly effect book sales would be stuff like NAZI propaganda, and such. And, there is no free speech as it is a private forum, and business is business, and maybe he's a Republican, lol.

YT in spoil tag, hope that is OKAY
Spoiler:


It's best to just not care. Liberals gonna liberal.
05-27-2017 , 10:12 PM
I think people take the politics forums too seriously anyway.

I mean no one really cares in the real world. It's a gambling site ffs, who would care what some idiots say on a politics subforum.
05-27-2017 , 10:27 PM
And you know, commies have killed more than fascists, but fascists are worse. But, that's a discussion for another day.
05-27-2017 , 10:47 PM
While that may be true, the people who whine about communists mostly don't know what an actual communist is, whereas we are currently witnessing a major American party turn hard toward fascism.
05-27-2017 , 10:49 PM
LOL
05-27-2017 , 11:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
the truth is i don't really care about the politics forums and let the mods do what they want. however, i won't let them ban people who actually want to use the rest of the site. those users can choose exile from this nonsense.
I'm less inclined to publish with twoplustwo, but it's not on the horizon anyway. There's always room for competition. That's how the real world works.

TwoPlusTwo can make this site better by

1. Addressing excessive censorship.
2. Addressing the favouritism.

Last edited by leavesofliberty; 05-27-2017 at 11:49 PM.
05-28-2017 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by averagejoe38
this forum certainly doesn't enhance the twoplustwo brand. Even the regular posters in here seem to think its a terrible place.

I completely disagree with both remarks.

Having forum space dedicated to politics is a huge benefit in terms of return users and new discussion. Politics alpha is the 8th largest forum on twoplustwo by number of posts, at over 1.6 million.

twoplustwo relies on advertisers, and advertisers like regular users, and lots of them. If for some reason twoplustwo completely deleted this forum and alpha, it is very likely that a large chunk of the user base would be lost, and all the possible future discussion that could occur in the forum would be lost. This would ultimately negatively effect twoplustwo's bottom line.

The successful forums, and the regular users who spend years on here should be seen as company assets by twoplustwo, and I think this is something they might not be doing.

I don't think this forum is a terrible place, I think chezlaw is a terrible mod and he's got to go.

Last edited by AllCowsEatGrass; 05-28-2017 at 12:57 AM.
05-28-2017 , 12:53 AM
I like David Sklansky's posts!

:boots:
05-28-2017 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
I mean no one really cares in the real world. It's a gambling site ffs, who would care what some idiots say on a politics subforum.

I think you'd be surprised. Nation States all across the globe engage in some sort of monitoring of internet discussions. You think governments aren't going to want to know what people are saying in political discussion? The US hires people to play MMO video games to look for terrorist threats FFS!
05-28-2017 , 12:59 AM
Oh ****! I better be careful what I say then.

      
m