I vote to ban all equivocation.

I do admit, I'm struggling to see how chez could have (even temporarily) turned this into a safe haven for racist idiots when he was pushing for it to be PC from the start, and from my brief reading seemed to be getting ragged on for banning links from breitbart and such. Also seems pretty unlikely that the oh-so-shrill lefties could have run the alt-right out of town.

Perhaps the forum is dead because it was held to it's original purpose - discussion for controversial topics. When I was here it seemed like most of the content was trolling morons for their 'controversial' views, but without that maybe people just weren't keen to actually discuss contro topics.

Who knows? All I can be certain of, is

lol wil

It's not about individuals at all. It's all about the group.

If people want to argue that some group isn't being harmed by prejudice/discrimination and so shouldn't be covered by the PC rules then they may or may not have a point. If they're arguing on the basis that an individual within that group isn't being harmed then they are missing the point.

Seconded.

Go read the atf thread about this forum. Chez never wanted his rules applied to the white supremacists.

Do you realize that if Bahamickey didn't post anymore this forum would be done?

This is sad. A person should never be sensored for what he thinks. If there are people on here who are from one of the "protected" groups, they should grow a set of balls and argue their side of things or gtfo! There are no moderators in the real world. It's time to grow up people!

Unless it's left wing students on a campus somewhere. Then it's serious business.

always lolwil when you just get dunked on mercilessly day in day out. you're like charlie brown trying to kick the football...

...but if charlie brown was delusional.

If you're talking about fires and property damage I agree it's serious business. These aren't moderators, these are cowards.

There are no white supremacist in these forums.

We scared them all back to their safe spaces?

Mission accomplished.

Hahahahaha what nonsense.

Yes do please read the ATF thread. It's very funny to see the sillyness repeated outside politard land.

Seriously smokey, it's well worth it.

FML I skimmed most of it and am no closer to the truth. I did learn the spank is still around and posting in needlessly abstract terms, and it was pretty entertaining but sad to see ACEG/LirvA going off the walls again.

Entertainment from it was all you could really hope for. I thought it was most amusing in parts - hope you thought it was worth wasting some life on.

Don't really know what you're talking about.

The "no moderators" thing doesn't really work. People don't delete my conversations in real life, but there's a whole network of people who make rules and enforce them. Plus the whole spiel from your lot is supposed to be that people get "shouted down" irl and left wingers are censoring and ruining everything.

SmokeyJ, you missed peak wil, basically.

Good thing this site runs on arrogance rather than repeat customers. Otherwise nothing else would make sense.

can we add christians, including white male christians to the vulnerable group list now?

surprised the lack of outrage or even discussion about the last 3 terror attacks from two far left dominant political sections. trumps hand shakes get exponentially more outrage

What's there really to say about copycat killings that hasn't already been said?

I watched Louis CK's new special over the weekend. Topically, one of his jokes was about how Christians straight up won everything, and if you aren't sure about that, just look at what year the entire world agrees it is and what that number is based on.

White male Christians must be some pretty special and timid little snowflakes (some might say "pussies" if they weren't being PC about it) if utter domination of the western world isn't enough to quell their terror and fear over a small handful of people dying. It's not really clear if you have any idea what a "vulnerable group" actually is?

yeah that was a great bit but can we let chezlaw decide?

i mean i just think theres a strong case to be made that we have a new vulnerable group here. its not 2016 or -8 anymore

Egyptian Christians are are Egyptian. I think were supposed to ignore those deaths like we ignore all the other non western (white) deaths caused by extremist Islam.

Not going in your favour I'm afraid. Can you can make the case that the use of language and arguments in our societies is perpetuating prejudice and discrimination against white christians in a way that harms then as a group?

Yes the terrorism is harmful and appalling but, apart from anything else, it's aimed at everybody isn't it?

chez, seriously wtf.

The two most wretchedly voluminous of P7 posters, themselves the recipients of several time outs and temp bans, turn up simultaneously and totally coincidentally of course after a break, and turn the Trump thread into a personal spat with others, and all you do is run in with a mop and tell them off?

You and others got involved with the personal spat as well. If you reported it (or ignored it) instead then it would be a lot better for the threads. I don't get the point of squabbling with people in the threads and then complaining about the squabbling.

There's no short leash policy but those with timeouts will get longer ones next time they get them- which wont be long if it continues.