Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
There's a fairly reasonable argument that TS' views are similar if not indistinguishable from the views of avowed white supremacists. For example (and note that I'm snipping posts for brevity. Click through for context)
On European Supremacy / Support for White Nationalism
Demonization of Muslims
Negative stereotypes of blacks, Jews, etc.
Support for "scientific" racism based on genetics
Note: these are from a thread specifically about race and crime. The implication is that a genetic predisposition towards crime among African Americans shouldn't be dismissed. TS tends to demur towards explanations based in alleged "cultural problems" while hinting at the genetic explanation in posts like this:
It's meaningful that for TS explanations of racial inequality are always either cultural deficiencies or genetic deficiencies. It should also be noted that basing a belief in the superiority of whites or Europeans in "culture" is no less racist. It's not racist to recognize the role of culture in the formation of societies and the construction of various social problems, but it is racist to essentialize and reify culture in the over-generalized and unsupported way that TS does, while ignoring the very real and well-supported facts of historical racism, discrimination, and oppression. "Cultural racism" is still racism.
In any case, the purpose of pulling all these quotes together is to show the very clear pattern. For TS, European Christians are exalted, the one true force for good and civilization in the world. Muslims, Jews, blacks, and others are all defective in various ways. The failures of Europeans should be overlooked in favor of their historical accomplishments while the failures of people belonging to other groups demonstrate the defectiveness of those groups. Allegations of racism against non-white groups are reflexively denied. White Nationalism is a justified reaction against the malignant forces of non-European cultural defects. The pattern of beliefs apparent in TS' posting is very much a pattern of asserted white supremacy, despite his hedging comments here and there.
(note: h/t to 5ive's thread for much of this)
I'd have to say I either agree or am intrigued by each of his points except for the genetic differences. If he was actually a white supremacist, then his arguments would be laughable easy to dismiss.
For some reason, all the brain power in this forum can't do that. Why? Either you guys are really bad at arguing or he may have an actual point. His arguments making you uncomfortable doesn't mean they are incorrect.
We now live in a feelings based society though ,so maybe that line of thought actually carries weight now. Personally, I'm more interested in truth.