Again, I most certainly can intelligently explain why you're a bad poster. Regardless of any other posters. And I have done directly that for months now.

ETA: Again, I most certainly can intelligently explain why you're a bad poster. Regardless of any other posters. And I have done directly that for months now.

Again, I most certainly can intelligently explain why you're a bad poster. Regardless of any other posters. And I have done directly that for months now.

Opinions of hubris do require repetition for support. Such 'fake-believe' notions have no firm existence beyond mere assertion.

Displaying the obsession prominently with such intentional repetition is a bold act.

What is the line between spam and obsessive hubris?

Shame Trolly,

You continue to use spank's signature avatar and constantly remind him that you can prove he's a bad poster based on something he did as a mod.

He hardly posts anything but funny comments now and is no longer a mod, and clearly roping you along.

He might be right though about your obsession.

Spank for mod!

This part is wrong. I was already calling him Teh Jabbor-Wookie long before his surprise and short-lived re-greening.

Your white knighting of spank is a pretty wild change from this: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/21...etard-1480975/

Spank isn't really doing those things now.

Plus I'm not white knighting anyone, I'm enjoying mocking Shame Trolly's ongoing crusade. Surely one can see he is being needlessly argumentative and derisive. And even a bit creepy. Even if spank agrees with this view.

Shamey is keeping Spank distracted in this thread, so that the others are mostly spank-free. Just let him do his Shamey thing and don't venture into this thread imo.

spank spank spank

I thought there already was a thread for this crusade (the spank translation thread).

I believe Shamey created this thread himself to be the new bad posters thread, not the "let's make another unreadable thread complaining about spank's tour as mod" thread.

Yeah... but I decided to take your advice and just let that thread go. Carrying on further, on my part, would have just been mean.

This is correct.

Lets's review recent history....

1. Shame Trolly embarrassed himself terribly in the spank thread and walked away with the lose.

2. Shame Trolly returns a week later and declares both victory,as well as, having some intelligent opinion beyond his own hubris in this thread.

3. Shame trolly is again humiliated and must again take a loss in his spank crusade.


So recent history is a lot like history further back.

Shame Trolly steps up to Spank with some bull crap and then has to skulk away to wipe his own bull crap off his nose.

The moral of the story is please stop doing this to yourself with your own opinion, Shame Trolly

Either way, spank is gonna practice his wicked linguistic skills with no shame in his game and come correct.

Oh man... I sounds like you're begging me to continue. Which I could, of-course, as the above is another steaming pile of gibberish... just begging for a 'decoding'. But instead... I'm going to just ask you to clarify something for us ITT...

Sure, the overall pastime of posting on an interwebs forum can, and sometimes is, referred to as 'a game'... just like anything else. But that's only a loose analogy, it's not a real winner/loser game.

Now... it *seems* you might be treating writing as a real winner/loser game. A game where you 'lose' if people can actually understand what you write, and a game where you 'win' if you spew gibberish, only become abusive when asked to clarify, and get the last word/post in.

So... please to be clarifying your remarks above !!!1!

Final Decoding...So Teh Jabber-Wookie... now that you've 'won', what are you going to do? Are you going to Dizzyland ??

No U.

Unless you have some compulsive need to chalk up an interwebs #win by getting that last word/post in...

Dude, I'm not making an 'argument', I'm making a guess. I'm trying to guess what you mean when you keep declaring 'wins' & 'loses' regarding your gibberish spewing. The reason I'm guessing is that you refused to clarify, like always. So no... my non-existent 'argument' isn't more or less whatever.

I'm guessing that you gotta get the last word/post in to chalk up your (oh-so-important but only to you) interwebs #win. You could simply just clarify what you actually mean, of course. However, I can also clarify what you mean by using empirical methods. You know run an experiment. Like this...

Yes my cousin, that's my operating theory too.

*Sigh* The unmentionable one only sent me some meaningless gossip. *Sigh* I've previously tried to get ikestoys interested in self-banning... without success. *Sigh*

Did a vanity search and realized Fly is dropping my name with a certain amount of frequency in the drunk sex thread; a thread I have been banned from.

I'm now anxiously awaiting the days-on-end OUTRAGE over this by Keeed, Low Key, Dids, etc., a la the OUTRAGE over my commenting on posters who weren't allowed the opportunity to defend themselves in my prior thread.

And that outrage was over my behavior in UNCHAINED! Man, the anger must be amplified significantly now that the same thing is happening in a forum with a certain level of decorum.

Look out Wookie! Your inbox is about to be flooded by excellent posters with morally consistent OUTRAGE. You know, as opposed to not getting any PMs by ****ty posters who were formerly just really butthurt and DGAF about the principle of dropping names when posters can't defend themselves.