Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)? Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)?

11-14-2016 , 01:43 PM
You're not very good at personal attacks, Dan.
11-14-2016 , 01:45 PM
Sorry to let you down Trolly
11-14-2016 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
You made up that story up on the spot after Hoya's story about the girl. You can deny it all you want. Anyhow, like I said, you're scrollworthy and I won't really bother interacting with you. You're not even fun like Ikes. You're just an insecure unhinged person who flies off the handle when insulted lmao.
I will shed a tear that an angry uneducated homophobe does not want to interact with me.
11-14-2016 , 01:53 PM
Try learning how to articulate yourself better instead of using one word repetitively. It makes you look like the dumb ass a lot of people recognized you as, even before I started to post again on 2p2.
11-14-2016 , 02:03 PM
Paul in my very first post from September quoted earlier I was correct that:

- The race was much closer than people were discussing and the early attacks on Nate's model for not showing the race as a blowout were ignorant.

- Goofball's model that so many kept referencing and praising was worthless garbage.

- Trump would implode bigly in the debates (this was just prior to the first).

- Trump would outperform in the election compared to the last polls just prior.

- Other candidates would soundly win a hypothetical matchup with Trump (this can be debated, though at this point I think the evidence and strong analysis indicates it to be likely).

And that was my first post!

I think I articulated my feelings and concerns regarding Clinton throughout the campaign in my time posting here, and I think compared to the echo chamber my analysis was objectively superior.

Of course this is not to say I just crystal-ball nailed everything, as I was still predicting Clinton would manage to win for a number of reasons. But if you think the 'fatkid's of this forum or even Mr. '+12 Clinton' Adanthar have more political knowledge or data analysis ability than myself, then I don't know what to tell you.
11-14-2016 , 02:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
Paul in my very first post from September quoted earlier I was correct that:

- The race was much closer than people were discussing and the early attacks on Nate's model for not showing the race as a blowout were ignorant.

- Goofball's model that so many kept referencing and praising was worthless garbage.

- Trump would implode bigly in the debates (this was just prior to the first).

- Trump would outperform in the election compared to the last polls just prior.

- Other candidates would soundly win a hypothetical matchup with Trump (this can be debated, though at this point I think the evidence and strong analysis indicates it to be likely).

And that was my first post!

I think I articulated my feelings and concerns regarding Clinton throughout the campaign in my time posting here, and I think compared to the echo chamber my analysis was objectively superior.

Of course this is not to say I just crystal-ball nailed everything, as I was still predicting Clinton would manage to win for a number of reasons. But if you think the 'fatkid's of this forum or even Mr. '+12 Clinton' Adanthar have more political knowledge or data analysis ability than myself, then I don't know what to tell you.
Would you say you have more political knowledge and superior "data analysis ability" than everyone on this site?
11-14-2016 , 02:15 PM
Definitely no on the first one, and very likely no on the second one.
11-14-2016 , 02:17 PM
Are you a fatty?
11-14-2016 , 02:24 PM
No, regular hiking, a Vitamix for green smoothies, an aversion to hfcs and semi-regular yoga has gone a long way as I have gotten older.
11-14-2016 , 02:45 PM
Most of the morons in the politics forum couldn't analyze anything objectively. They are so inept.

I predicted in the election thread back in August that Trump would win and that the polls were not showing the true picture. Of course I was ridiculed, insulted and scoffed at by all the "experts" in that thread. The polls don't lie, they said. It's going to be a landslide for Clinton.

I mean seriously, they are so up themselves and the groupthink has so eroded their objectivity, that they just don't have a clue.
11-14-2016 , 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
That would be pretty epic



This is dumb. Likely because you yourself are dumb.
How much ass kissing did you have to do to get another mod gig? White knighting for Wookie now lol.

How come you didn't welcome me back Limp Noodle?
11-14-2016 , 04:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
You're not very good at personal attacks, Dan.
Is that a bad thing?

In any case, He's come to the right place to learn.
11-14-2016 , 10:59 PM
Paul D confirmed dumbass. Aren't you the one who had an issue with me saying someone should take a midol because it may make gizmo uncomfortable? Lolololololol lllllooooooooooooolllllll.

Idiot.
11-15-2016 , 12:50 PM
Just a question, who made noodle a mod?
11-15-2016 , 01:02 PM
Mat Sklansky
11-16-2016 , 06:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oroku$aki
Mat Sklansky




Spoiler:
11-16-2016 , 08:52 AM
temporary; just for this thread: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/41...orter-1638326/
11-16-2016 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Most of the morons in the politics forum couldn't analyze anything objectively. They are so inept.

I predicted in the election thread back in August that Trump would win and that the polls were not showing the true picture. Of course I was ridiculed, insulted and scoffed at by all the "experts" in that thread. The polls don't lie, they said. It's going to be a landslide for Clinton.

I mean seriously, they are so up themselves and the groupthink has so eroded their objectivity, that they just don't have a clue.
It wasn't easy to predict a massive number of Trump supporters hiding their true voting intentions due to embarrassment and shame over their idiot candidate.
11-16-2016 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
It wasn't easy to predict a massive number of Trump supporters hiding their true voting intentions due to embarrassment and shame over their idiot candidate.
Sure it was. The problem doesn't lie with those people, but people like you, who have warped reality so you feel good about things.

Doesn't feel so good now, does it?
11-16-2016 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
It wasn't easy to predict a massive number of Trump supporters hiding their true voting intentions due to embarrassment and shame over their idiot candidate.

I don't believe it was shame or embarrassment but rather trying avoid the automatic "RACIST" label. You are still doing the things that drove a lot of support Trumps way.


Good job, you are really doing Gods work! God bless and God speed.
11-16-2016 , 11:12 PM
lol
11-17-2016 , 06:03 AM
This is some sweet-ass retconning, or maybe just the garden-variety lack of critical thinking.

Yeah, you weren't mocked and ridiculed because you WANTED a white nationalist cartoon character who never read a book TO WIN, it was instead because you simply THOUGHT a white nationalist cartoon character who never read a book MIGHT WIN.

That's totally what happened.
11-17-2016 , 06:17 AM
So, this past NBA championship I wanted GSW to win and was a fan, but I thought CLE would win! Mostly because, Lebron, duh, and because Kyrie Irving was wildly underrated. Guess what, the CLE fans that wanted them to win, didn't think they'd win! And guess what also, CLE won!

I'm pretty sure the population of bad posters here just got cut in half with the head asploding that just happened.
11-17-2016 , 06:28 AM
In fact I'm pretty me sure thinking CLE would win, despite wanting GSW to win, is what made LBJ and Irving both go off for 40+ that game.
11-17-2016 , 06:30 AM
God help us, you people are a mobius pretzel of unfathomable stupidity.

That probably should've been the slogan.

trump 2016: a mobius pretzel of unfathomable stupidity

      
m