In an forum exchange, one person might ask another person why they said something because they are curious what information supports what was said.

BTW- Why would you say that? Anyone can cherry pick any question a person asks to make that assertion.

Do you have a different, perhaps better argument?

So? You don't engage in forum exchanges. An exchange implies reciprocity. One person might ask another to clarify... but it's got to go both ways. Whenever someone asks you to clarify... well, we know what happens, at best you willfully refuse.

This lack of reciprocity is what makes you a useless, and thoroughly willful, troll. LMFAO @Teh Jabber-Wookie !!!1!

I answered your post and answered it well.

What exactly do you want reciprocated?

No, you didn't answer everything. You really are a semi-literate idiot. First of all, my post you refer to isn't in the form of a question. Second, your response isn't in the form of an answer. Let's roll tape...

Now, I'll give you that this is an answer to some question. On Jeopardy, i'd go with "WTF is 'clarify'?" Gee thanks, Captain Obvious. Nobody is asking you what it means to clarify... the question is why you willfully refuse to ever do so.

And these aren't answers at all. At best they're questions... at most they're gibberish.

If you go around asking people questions, you should reciprocate and answer questions posed to you. Like LMFAO @Teh Jabber-Wookie !!!1!

I'm glad I could help explain what 'why would you ask that?' means.

Again, thanks Captain Obvious. Nobody asked that question. I'm glad that makes you glad. You really are a semi-literate idiot.

So... any thoughts about reciprocating regarding asking & answering questions ITFs ??

I'm still happy to help. Thanks for mentioning my post. Until next time, if the topic is of interest.

Yeah... not really into introspection, are you.

When you first started posting here you were admittedly interested in, and willfully regurgitating, ACer gibberish. My 'tactic', as you call it, was to carefully explain that ACer gibberish is in fact gibberish, while laughing and pointing at those spewing such. Now, with 20/20 hindsight, you are LYAO at that same ACer bullpoop.

So... don't I get some credit for opening your eyes?

It's a bit egotistic and unkind of you to think it was your gibberish about AC gibberish being gibberish that changed his mind.

Only a moron would fall for your squaring the circle nonsense.

Sklanski

stfu Sklansky is a national treasure

Wil definitely earned a slot in the title for his constant self-reference, feelings based form of argument.

Possibly one of the stupidest posters we've had on here in a while

I assume Noodle Wazlib is the latest LK incarnation?

I think I'm just going to put all non-LK accounts on ignore.

Surmise != assume.

So what? There is plenty of overlap there, including how it was used above.

Deuces got my back!

Quick shout out to jjshabado Solid bad posting in the mod thread.

Suddenly the mod thread is plagued by terrible posters going nuts about the supremacy of their opinions of my modding days.

Lol. Stay Gold Ponyboy.

Spank not being in the title of this thread calls for an edit or (v3) IMO.

It's a mercy for your delicacy of disagreement that your screen name has been left out.

I'm pathologically objective.

Everyone else is too. Some of us have figured out the solution to the inherent problem with this.

What problem is that? Not being a 'team player'? I don't consider that a problem.

I eat sacred cow every day.

If you mean thinking yourself objective always and never being wrong and accusing others of bias all the time, well, I'm pretty objective about that too.

You mean "objective" in parallel to the way the kids now use "literally," right?

My opinions are objective and the pizza I just ate from Gianna's is literally like an orgasm straight out of the oven.

(I do highly recommend Gianna's pizza, fwiw)

The objective, the objectionable, and the objectifying.