Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)? Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)?

11-18-2015 , 02:54 PM
The more intentional distortion shame trolly creates, the more we can say he intentionally distorts.
11-18-2015 , 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
The more intentional distortion shame trolly creates, the more we can say he intentionally distorts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie ~ decoded
Trulli created a deliberate misrepresentation of shame. We can not say more, lest we deliberately distort.
My response, again as a courtesy encoded into Teh Jabber-Wookie gibberish...
I was really semi-enlightened, you idiot German Jaber. Look... a Wookie !1!
11-18-2015 , 03:43 PM
A smear artist intentionally distorts other people, hence we have shame trolly, the smear artist who has been smearing spank off and on for over a year.

ST acts like he knows spank with a bunch of fake importance and authority, but in reality he can only possibly know very little. In fact, he was informed directly that he does not know hardly anything about spank and never will know anything about spank due to his creepy behavior.

Look it up. It is all there in the old spank thread. Shamer already failed miserably in that spank thread a few months ago and you can easily observe he did not learn anything from the experience by his spank-related behavior today.

So, shame trolly is a stupid creep. I feel sorry for him. I doubt he could successfully cause anyone actual shame. Too weak.
11-18-2015 , 03:51 PM
Why do assume anyone will look anything up? You're a well known liar so anything you say is suspect; particularly when it comes to other members of the forum. You would be better served sticking to the topic of a thread instead of attacking every poster who you don't like.
11-18-2015 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
A smear artist intentionally distorts other people, hence we have shame trolly, the smear artist who has been smearing spank off and on for over a year.

ST acts like he knows spank with a bunch of fake importance and authority, but in reality he can only possibly know very little. In fact, he was informed directly that he does not know hardly anything about spank and never will know anything about spank due to his creepy behavior.

Look it up. It is all there in the old spank thread. Shamer already failed miserably in that spank thread a few months ago and you can easily observe he did not learn anything from the experience by his spank-related behavior today.

So, shame trolly is a stupid creep. I feel sorry for him. I doubt he could successfully cause anyone actual shame. Too weak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie ~ decoded
Cotton artists deliberately distorted the others, so we have to be really humble. Which elegantly applied artists and their dyeing operations last for more than a year?

ST's behavior, whether he knows a bunch of falsehoods, is that of a host of importance and authority. But, in fact, he can not help but know very little that is false. In fact, I was told directly that he does not know what is almost not, gracefully, ever known. How's that for an elegance in creepy behavior?

Find him. It's all in an elegant old theme. Sam as I has failed miserably on this issue of elegance for months. You can easily see that he had learned nothing from that experience, and I beat him at today's behavior.

Thus, shame... Trulli is a stupid reptiles. I feel sorry for him. I suspect it may successfully cause actual humiliation to someone. Very well.
I'd like to specifically address this part of Teh Jabber-Wookie's argument. Again, as a courtesy, my response has been reverse-translated into his kinda gibberish...

Quote:
... ST's behavior, whether he knows a bunch of falsehoods, is that of a host of importance and authority. But, in fact, he can not help but know very little that is false. In fact, I was told directly that he does not know what is almost not, gracefully, ever known. How's that for an elegance in creepy behavior?
Hey, Jaber German... You wookie, it's just always busy when you call all-in with "You cannot read my mind, so neaner-neaner-neaner... I won !1!". This is the Proph level infanismon. Of course, I cannot 'grok' your idea stew pot, so I did not really "know" why you did your trolls and spams. But I do not care why... so neaner-neaner-neaner. You're a half-educated idiot who trolls and spams. Everything's on permanent record here, waiting for your forensic analysis. Damn, shut up !1!
11-18-2015 , 04:41 PM
Shame Trolly and The smear gang make it so easy to report by constantly adding evidence to the case against them.

Whiny accusatory liars creating dishonest whiny accusations. LMAO.. You can't escape your own history of behaviors and you don't stop repeating them. Wow.

Of course kerowo supports whiny smear artists, he is one!
11-18-2015 , 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
What purpose does Teh Jabber-Wookie serve here in Los Dos Politardias?

If he willfully refuses to communicate (which he does), and he promiscuously interjects his gibberish into threads (which he does), then he's the textbook definition of a troll: someone who is intentionally trying to disrupt an online conversation. If the frequency of such trolling becomes in itself disruptive (which it has) then that's the textbook definition of spamming...
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Shame Trolly and The smear gang make it so easy... kerowo supports whiny smear artists, he is one!
OK, let's bring it back to my initial comment today. What purpose does Teh Jabber-Wookie serve in Los Dos Politardias?

He, for whatever reasons, simply refuses to communicate. Here ITT, he's having a soliloquy... he's talking to himself exclusively, while refusing to engage in any discussion. He willfully interjected himself into this thread... there's no reason a bad poster needs to defend every example of his bad posting.

He's the textbook definition of a troll. Flat out.
11-18-2015 , 05:08 PM
Shame trolly smears and shames people, then whines that they don't communicate with him and then still whines and accuses some more. LMAO!

Today is even more pleasing than yesterday.
11-18-2015 , 05:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Shame trolly... whines that they don't communicate with him...
Nope. That's not it, you semi-literate idiot. In fact, I'd be happy if you just didn't respond to me.

You refuse to communicate with anyone. Period. It's not just me.

A classic example was your recent farcical hectoring with your "when does somebody stop being a racist?' line. Like forever and always... it's all there on THE PERMANENT RECORD, awaiting your forensic analysis.
11-18-2015 , 05:21 PM
Shame trolley is smearing his spank output all over everything.
11-18-2015 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Shame trolly... whines that they don't communicate with him...
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Kerowo... asks them questions... Kerowo proceeds to then... accuse the person further for rejecting his questions...
Do we see a pattern forming here ??

The obvious follow on questions are... (a) exactly who is Teh Jabber-Wookie willing to communicate with?... and (b) does Teh Jabber-Wookie's head x-plode if that poster asks him "when does a person stop being racist?".
11-18-2015 , 06:27 PM
I reject shame trolly's air of authority and importance about spank. I told him months ago he wouldn't get any obligation from me for satisfaction of his spank demands and accusations. Yet, he still tries, to the delight of my funny bone.

Shamer just needs to focus his responsibility on his own behavior and everything will be okay.
11-18-2015 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
My response, again as a courtesy encoded into Teh Jabber-Wookie gibberish...
I was really semi-enlightened, you idiot German Jaber. Look... a Wookie !1!
These translations are pure gold lol
11-18-2015 , 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
I reject shame trolly's air of authority and importance about spank. I told him months ago he wouldn't get any obligation from me for satisfaction of his spank demands and accusations. Yet, he still tries, to the delight of my funny bone.

Shamer just needs to focus his responsibility on his own behavior and everything will be okay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie ~ decoded
I reject the power and importance, with a dishonesty air, of Trulli's elegance. I told him a few months ago he will not get any commitment from me to any request and get any satisfaction of the categories of his grace. However, he said he is still trying to humor joy.

Shemer just need to focus on the responsibility of my public behavior, everything will be fine.
Here is my response to his argument. Again, as a courtesy, I've reverse translated it into Teh Jabber-Wookie style gibberish...

Hey, stupid face is once again doing a monologue as a semi-illiterate. He's gabbering I believed in the Berber language. Do not you know, when you refuse to one and then garbage the interwebs to jam communicate with all... you need to STFU !1!
11-19-2015 , 07:21 AM
Bahaha such great work, Shame Trolly
11-19-2015 , 09:10 AM
Chez I am moving the conversation with you here as the more appropriate thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
He has become an idiotic troll. He's studied politics and been active in politics which helps explain why he's postings on politics are impressive but for some reason he has decided to become an idiotic troll as well.

He's still defending his 'ooo chez made loads of posts and then said he didn't know where he was' idiotic gotcha because he's being an idiotic troll - it's very unlikely he is so perfect he never makes simple mistakes about unimportant matters but even if he is he should be clever enough to be able to understand it easily. If he was half the person he thinks he is he would simply say he made a mistake about it - it's no big deal.
No Chez I am pointing out that me drawing attention to the number of posts in a thread posted by someone who didn't know where the thread is located is not the same as pointing out the number of posts Dids makes being critical in P, it's not the same argument at all and adios was obviously a tad upset with my line so decided to make an entirely unrelated point as a gotcha because he's a dickhead.

It is not surprising to me that you contribute to this discussion across two threads but for the record this is what this is about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
The argument that not taking in refugees will help ISIS recruitment has a flaw. Anyone who would become a terrorist or a terrorist supporter for this reason is someone we should we be glad identified himself. There are good reasons to accept refugees but this isn't one of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
The argument that people who don't want to admit refugees must be racist has a flaw. It is true that the risk reward equation gives higher pot odds than some of the larger risks we take for lessor rewards. However there are many people who don't realize this and would change their mind if they did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
People are not math problems. Just stop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
He didn't claim they were, his insight is actually highly valued by a lot of people including me. Why don't you stop complaining about other posters in your posts. I have my doubts that anyone gives a **** what you like and don't like. Of course same applies to me, nobody cares what I like or dislike in posting. There is a whole thread for griping in the other forum. Just stop with your moaning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
When complaining about someone moaning it helps to not sound like someone moaning. Sklansky's posts in politics are consistently awful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Not moaning, calling him out. Your entitled to your opinion about Sklansky but that is all it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
Then Dids is calling out Sklansky, you can't whinge about people complaining and defend yourself by just deciding to call it something else.

It is my opinion but it's at least an informed one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Nope, want to make a bet that in the last 6 months Dids has at least 5 times as many posts in this forum complaining about other posters?

Why is your opinion so informed? You get the last word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
The number of posts is irrelevant, if it offends you ignore it and you are less likely to contribute to the derail we are currently engaged in.

Because my first political campaign, albeit in a very minor role was in 1983, I did leave college in 1987 to work full time on my local member of parliament's successful reelection before returning to college to graduate with a degree in politics and history, the MA I am currently studying includes political philosophy.

None of that makes me an expert on anything but it does mean I have some experience of considering political arguments and I find DS's consistently lacking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
There's a difference between complaining about DS posting OT and complaining about someone complaining about DS posting OT

This is not an opinion, it's a matter of fact.
So adios takes exception to Dids justifiably calling DS's Politics posts rubbish, I reckon Dids view is justified so respond and he then gets into it with me, decides against pursuing the discussion in the thread and takes it to PU to make an entirely different point as some kind of gotcha, Chez attempts to engage with me by making some point I don't understand then comes back here to talk about posters rather than substance.

All because he's a dickhead. Played

Last edited by dereds; 11-19-2015 at 09:16 AM.
11-19-2015 , 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
Chez I am moving the conversation with you here as the more appropriate thread.

No Chez I am pointing out that me drawing attention to the number of posts in a thread posted by someone who didn't know where the thread is located is not the same as pointing out the number of posts Dids makes being critical in P, it's not the same argument at all and adios was obviously a tad upset with my line so decided to make an entirely unrelated point as a gotcha because he's a dickhead.
and I pointed out that you made a silly mistake about me forgetting where I was and the number of posts, and that you referred to it again without acknowledging that you made a silly mistake.

Maybe you should consider why you find it so difficult to admit to making mistakes. Do you admit them to yourself and just cant bring yourself to say so in public for whatever reason or are you actually deluded enough to think you don't make them?

You're still doing it with talking about posters. I'm more than happy to talk about current posters in PU - you've made a silly mistake about the level of detail point I made. If you admitted it then we could move on but you wont so it's just pointing out what an idiot you are.
11-19-2015 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
I reject shame trolly's air of authority and importance about spank. I told him months ago he wouldn't get any obligation from me for satisfaction of his spank demands and accusations. Yet, he still tries, to the delight of my funny bone.

Shamer just needs to focus his responsibility on his own behavior and everything will be okay.
This spank output is unsatisfying.
11-19-2015 , 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
This spank output is unsatisfying.

That's okay. We are under no obligation to be satisfied by the same things.
11-19-2015 , 12:48 PM
This is what Teh Jabber-Wookie 'hears'...

Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly ~ encoded
Spank, This production is not satisfactory.

[This spank output is unsatisfying.]
And this is what we should 'hear' from Teh Jabber-Wookie. The amazing thing is it always makes more sense when 'decoded'. LMFAO @Teh Jabber-Wookie !!!1!

Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie ~ decoded
All right. But it's not the obligation to be satisfied through the same thing for each of us. Slap, this production is not satisfactory.

[That's okay. We are under no obligation to be satisfied by the same things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Well I can describe all of it in fine detail and form tremendous ad hominems from the posting history information available. I've decided to do that much less now, thanks in part to you.

Contemplating clean slates has led me to choose to give them away universally on the matter, regardless of any explicit agreement.

As far as I am concerned it is a new day for new bad posts. Clean slates for erryone!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Maybe the message needs to go through Shame Trolly's translator.
Happy to oblige...

Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie ~ decoded
Well, I can not describe them, but I decided to publish much less, and to do so in the form of microscopic elements. Ad hominems and such information is a huge statement.

Now, partially thanks to you wanting a clean cloth, it has led me to choose to be released from their world regardless of any agreement expressed to me. Everyday's a new work for the new evil erryone.

Clean table !1!
11-19-2015 , 01:00 PM
I actually meant kerowo's message...he wasn't getting it so figured maybe hed understand it if translated?
11-19-2015 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
This spank output is unsatisfying.
Sure seems like spank output has dried up since kero put him on notice

I'm sure it's a coincidence that he just happened to start posting less in protest
11-19-2015 , 01:08 PM
He may just need to eat more oysters.
11-19-2015 , 01:13 PM
OKVG

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo ~ encoded
No, I think I will stop him. If not... to improve their position. And, there are a lot of complaints about it, and I tried to talk about it, but he was too hostile to answer. The only thing that this is consistent with is the threat to ban it, and this is what I do.

[No, I plan to ban him if he doesn't improve his posting, there have been multiple complaints about it and when attempts have been made to talk to him about it he has responded with hostility. The only thing he responds to is threats of being banned so that is what I am doing.]
11-20-2015 , 11:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
...Can you explain why you say...
This is why Teh Jabber-Wookie serves no useful purpose.

Here he is hectoring someone else to clarify WTF they're saying. But if anyone, and I mean anyone ever, asks Teh Jabber-Wookie to clarify he has a meltdown, and then often proceeds to spam the forums.

Of course, anyone is free to follow the above link, and then ask Teh Jabber-Wookie the same exact question he is hectoring someone else about above. That's clearly 100% fair and completely reasonable. LMFAO @Teh Jabber-Wookie !!!1!

      
m