I mean, searching on posts by spanktehbadwookie backs up my assertions.

Based on what you have tried so far, it is fair to expect unintelligent and poorly informed speculation to back up any attempt at meaningful interpretations of my posts.

Most damning to you is you consistently exclude other people's opinions of themselves in favor of your own opinion's supremacy. You'll never be more accurate in a position by excluding entire areas of pertinent knowledge.

So, you have shown a lack of credibility, of impartiality, and of an intelligent motive. Realistically you have had months to reveal your super-smart evidence-based spank analysis, but instead have chosen the worst possible way to establish the credibility such an analysis is even possible.

It's too late.

Too late for whom?
Too late for what?

Im making factual claims about what you actually posted, what are you spanklishing about? Did you not tell us some bizarre story about a Phd reading all your posts? Did you not tell people their posts were going ON FILE or IN THE PERMANENT RECORD? I don't really care what opinion you had about yourself while you made those posts, and I certainly wouldn't try to interpret them because they are meaningless rantings of an insane person, so don't know what you are talking about there.

It's too late for your team's spank opinions to be smart or credible.

You all share emotional dislike and fiction about people, including myself, to the detriment of everyone's reputation.

It's too late for you to win power over other people's reputation with credible honesty.

You could be lucky someone is telling you why you were being stupid for your benefit if you use your free will and choose.

I'm for you not acting stupid. It's not too late to smarten up.

Why do you dehumanize everyone who doesn't share your opinion with this "team" language?

Your posting behavior is in the public record, it's not fiction.

Any damage to your reputation was at your own hands. People had to read your posts before they read my posts about how bad your posts where.

This doesn't mean anything but does echo back the free will discussions we had.

This is essentially what I asked you to do after your last foray into crazy posting and low and behold you did! For which I thank you.

This why you are a scumbag. You are dishonest and make excuses. That is also why you are stupid.

See this is how criticism works. It is specific and useful. If you stop being stupid by using your half-assed opinions to back up your non-specific and convenient accusations, you can then stop being dishonest and making argumentative excuses trying to back them up.

Your criticism of me is totally nonspecific and of no use to me at all for being inaccurate and mistaken.

According to you, I once upon a time behaved non-specifically human, therefore you choose to mod me. Now here we have real evidence of an emotional motive, because you have not even tried to build your opinion past nonspecific and unrealistic accusations and this makes it really reek of stupidity and dislike.

It maybe even be you are not dishonest, you just aren't quite aware that you don't really have much goods to support spreading rumors and making mod choices towards me like you did and perhaps still choose to do. You just don't have anyone telling you to stop except people you choose not to listen to.

Got this far and lol'd. Spank just posts random words without being literate enough to understand what they mean, then posts bull**** about language capability and Phd's because...reasons.

lol spank.

I just always lol at how hypocritical he is.

Someone says something about him and it's all scummy and incorrect can't be backed up and blabbity blah.

He says something about someone else and it's valid criticism.

He's just trying to see what he can get away with again. I imagine he'll get warned soon and go back to being scant again.

More accusations from dislike supported with insinuations of authority.

You do realize I can observably describe your behavior way more accurately than you can describe mine, right? And I am being very fair even suggesting there is anything authentic behind your descriptive opinion on the matter beyond your previously admitted personal dislike. It's a tough spot for you to be in.

Specific

Not specific

This is what spank actually believes.

Not that tough, he's never getting banned.

Your fictions about me are very convenient for you to repeat, specifically.

I am always amused by the group that thinks quoting their posts back to them is some form of trickery.

Spank, have someone who is not a defective illiterate explain what specific means and try again.

We keep running into this problem where you cant follow conversations because you don't understand what words mean and then lash out blindly with nonsense because you don't understand what words mean.

Thanks, this is exactly the stuff which impeaches you as confirmed stupid, dishonest, and biased. You need vulgar accusations to compensate for lack of substance to your position. That is the result of dabbling a prolonged time with fiction.

Whether it's you and illiteracy, or rjoe and whatever random accussation he's got, or kerowo's conspiracy theory of non-specific "bad" behavior, all builds up to where you can either stop or remain full of **** perpetually. The choice is really yours.

Kind of but he's answering a specific claim from Harris in that;

And then goes on to explain the mechanics of influencing others. He's a compatibilist so his position is that there's an account of free will compatible with determinism, it doesn't claim that we are influence outside of the mechanics. It's been a while and I've only skimmed but that's how I understand the position.

He says pretty clearly that his definition of "free will" is not really the colloquial definition. It seems like one of those philosophy things that's hard to understand, but at some point I may give it a shot. With my colloquial brain it seems hard to reconcile determinism and free will. I appreciate that he points out that hand waving around quantum mechanics isn't any kind of positive indication of free will.

Im calling you illiterate because you keep ignoring words and using words in ways that don't make sense. Do you have a better word to describe that?

I'm in danger of rewriting a stuff from an excellent advocate of the compatibilist free will position from some RGT and SMP threads but I kinda disagree with Dennett here, it's not the colloquial definition of free will that's the problem it's the commonly understood philosophical definition as being contra causal which has gone the way of the dodo. Generally we admit to doing stuff of our own free will when we aren't compelled by another, it doesn't require us not be part of a causal chain. That's the definition the compatibilist defends but his colloquial definition is the now generally abandoned philosophical one. It's not an area of philosophy that I've spent any real time on.

the one true God: our lord and savior, the Dark Prince Lucifer

Stick to the containment thread please

Your repetition of an accusation which is only supported by your half-assed opinion is way more likely your own denial of the half-assedness of your opinion because of personal dislike, than anything to do with my language-use capability.

I have every fact available about my linguist knowledge and capability and you only have a repeated accusation and half-assed opinion. That is how stupid a spot you made for yourself here.

You realize other people can see your posts too?

Catachresis? Palinism?

Im happy to refer to Spank as a Palinist if it will make him happier.