Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)? - Page 13 - Politics version 7.0 -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Same thing as usual.... Women have the right to choose. Planned Parenthood helps the poor and minorities. It's like a perfect target for republican political wiles.

07-30-2015 , 08:33 PM

#304

rjoefish

Got Out the Vote

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,086

DIB I'm confident you know how to Google and figure it out for yourself.

If not then grats, I think you got us back on topic.

07-30-2015 , 08:50 PM

#305

DudeImBetter

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 10,664

Google just yields doom and gloom right wing derp. Not finding defense pieces on the fetus organ hawking

07-30-2015 , 09:25 PM

#306

AsianNit

banned

Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 9,881

Try searching using the term " site: dailykos.com". That should lead you to diaries that have links to the info you want if you are seeking a leftist perspective on something.

08-04-2015 , 01:13 PM

#307

Namath12

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 55,849

hornbug just can't seem to get over the bad posting hump

08-05-2015 , 06:13 PM

#308

JiggsCasey

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 7,275

Foldn is having an absolute meltdown in the baby eating thread. Someone call for help before he hurts himself.

08-05-2015 , 06:27 PM

#309

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,190

It's all theater, he doesn't mean any of it.

08-05-2015 , 06:31 PM

#310

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,890

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerowo

It's all theater, he doesn't mean any of it.

It's concerning that no-one has been able to do anything with eating fetuses and being facetious.

08-05-2015 , 06:33 PM

#311

AsianNit

banned

Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 9,881

Chez, which posts in that thread do you think are the most obvious examples of trolling?

08-05-2015 , 06:44 PM

#312

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,890

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianNit

Chez, which posts in that thread do you think are the most obvious examples of trolling?

My much repeated point was about trolling/insulting and was just hoping to get a laugh from wookie saying wil hadn't been insulted or trolled in P. No surprises he wasn't willing to say that.

Personally I would reject your idea that trolling in a combination of posts requires any specific post to be trolling in itself but I still invite you to start a thread on trolling if you're really interested in the subject.

08-05-2015 , 06:54 PM

#313

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,190

Quote:

Originally Posted by chezlaw

Personally I would reject your idea that trolling in a combination of posts requires any specific post to be trolling in itself but I still invite you to start a thread on trolling if you're really interested in the subject.

Wat? 7 posts that are not trolling in nature can be considered as a group to be trolling? How does that work?

08-05-2015 , 07:08 PM

#314

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,890

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerowo

Wat? 7 posts that are not trolling in nature can be considered as a group to be trolling? How does that work?

There's no reference to those 7 posts from me but if the intention is to wind someone up to the point they respond emotionally then each single post might be well short of that in itself while the combined effect is very effective.

08-05-2015 , 07:14 PM

#315

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,190

So you're going to go with any post that pisses someone off is trolling? Weak sauce.

08-05-2015 , 07:23 PM

#316

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,890

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerowo

So you're going to go with any post that pisses someone off is trolling? Weak sauce.

No I don't think so.

Pretty sure if you gave any sort of clear definition of trolling you wish to use we could come up with a combination of posts that did the job while none individually did. Unless you prohibit it in the definition in which case we could achieve the trolling effect you were trying to ban without breaking the rules.

edit: can you imagine some bozzo defending circumventing the profanity rules by saying no individual post contained anything unacceptable.

08-05-2015 , 07:26 PM

#317

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Doesn't matter what chez thinks is trolling since y'all use your own very special definition for the word.

What matters is chez's senitment that Wil had a long history of going back and forth in argument with both MrWookie and LetsGambool is accurate.

It appears they and others are driven to being really emotional about this history of mutual argument being mentioned. Seriously upset. To the extent of making a bunch of needless argument with chez about it and denigrating the illiterate/mentally deficient. Lol.

08-05-2015 , 07:43 PM

#318

AsesinoDePayasos

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 208

So spank takes issue with LG denigrating the mentally deficient/illiterate, and then spank proceeds to carry chez's water. All while chez is calling numerous posters lunatics. Good stuff.

08-05-2015 , 07:47 PM

#319

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,890

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsesinoDePayasos

So spank takes issue with LG denigrating the mentally deficient/illiterate, and then spank proceeds to carry chez's water. All while chez is calling numerous posters lunatics. Good stuff.

welcome back

Great start confusing a silly thread about eating babies with some sort of forum proxy war.

08-05-2015 , 07:56 PM

#320

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsesinoDePayasos

So spank takes issue with LG denigrating the mentally deficient/illiterate, and then spank proceeds to carry chez's water. All while chez is calling numerous posters lunatics. Good stuff.

If I were going to take issue, it would be with no one else taking issue with denigrating those traditionally oppressed classes of people in a direct and undeniable manner.

For now, however, I find it enough simply observing people ( like you it seems) who did not take issue with that kind of behavior while choosing far more trivial behavior to take much issue with.

08-05-2015 , 08:40 PM

#321

AsianNit

banned

Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 9,881

Quote:

Originally Posted by chezlaw

Do you see a difference between intentionally trying to wind someone up and not caring if strongly-worded sentiment provokes a reaction from someone who is emotionally fragile? Do posters have to change their behavior when arguing with someone who is prone to the vapors?

08-05-2015 , 08:49 PM

#322

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,890

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianNit

Do you see a difference between intentionally trying to wind someone up and not caring if strongly-worded sentiment provokes a reaction from someone who is emotionally fragile?

Yes I see a difference though i gather that considering intent isn't overly popular in some circles. What about you?

Quote:

Do posters have to change their behavior when arguing with someone who is prone to the vapors?

No they don't have to though personally I often change my behavior depending on how the person reacts. Not noticing that different people react differently would be weird but I assume no-one does that.

08-06-2015 , 09:14 AM

#323

DudeImBetter

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 10,664

Chez how do you feel about being the most (un)popular poster currently? Seems like everyone can't stop speaking your name!

08-06-2015 , 09:42 AM

#324

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,890

Quote:

Originally Posted by DudeImBetter

Chez how do you feel about being the most (un)popular poster currently? Seems like everyone can't stop speaking your name!

I genuinely hope they aren't as miserable as some of them appear to be. Anyone posting on PU without a smile and a throbbing erection (the erection bit's a joke zigzag btw) a fair bit of the time probably has something wrong with them.

At least with someone like low key you can tell his having a bit of fun. Some of them I have to wonder about.