Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)? Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)?

05-21-2015 , 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Notice, if you will, how I'm NOT "harassing" her any longer, have apologized for my actions, and how I've stated I have no intentions to "harass" despite threatening to do so and her opting to DOXX talk anyway.

But don't let reality get in the way of your little narrative.
If you have no intentions to harass despite threatening to do so and you have publicly admitted that lack of intention, then she is not risking being harassed by bringing up stuff you don't want here to mention, so it's stupid to suggest that she is irrationally risking being harassed unless you are lying about having no intentions to harass.
05-21-2015 , 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
So let's say it's real Giz. What's your motive? The scoring of points and high fives is juicy enough to commpensate for the sexual harassment?
She's making you look like a eunuch because all you do is talk about threats that you say you have no intention of following through on.
05-21-2015 , 09:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianNit
If you have no intentions to harass despite threatening to do so and you have publicly admitted that lack of intention, then she is not risking being harassed by bringing up stuff you don't want here to mention, so it's stupid to suggest that she is irrationally risking being harassed unless you are lying about having no intentions to harass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianNit
She's making you look like a eunuch because all you do is talk about threats that you say you have no intention of following through on.
This all started before I admitted having no intention to follow through. But I'm pretty sure you knew that.

Anyway, think I'm done here. As I said before, I'm surely gonna have to be comfortable with not getting (straight) answers to my questions. Which is fine.
05-21-2015 , 09:34 PM
Having two bad poster threads is an interesting accidental experiment.
05-21-2015 , 09:56 PM
It's like double the derisiveness and derision and stuff.
05-21-2015 , 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
It's like double the derisiveness and derision and stuff.
2 is hardly excessive.
05-21-2015 , 11:41 PM
National and American Leagues, imo. I have a feeling they're gonna stoop to flashy, crowd-pleasing gimmicks like the DH over there. Nobody cares about the purity of the game anymore.
05-21-2015 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Pretty sure forgot, but would have no qualms apologizing again.

Uncool of me to persistently touch on something I knew she/you were very uncomfortable with just to get a rise out of you two. Ditto commenting on Dids being ugly. Think there's a line of acceptability re: posting demeanor even in PUC and that I had crossed it repeatedly in these regards. Truly regret it and am sorry about doing so.
Thanks.

This is why I want you in on the workgroup for serious unchained forum business. You have experience and set example which speaks for finer articulated lines of behavior that would be unacceptable in mutual poster insult combat. Discussion for the workgroup would centered around what could be reflected in a reasonably crafted rule to address the issue.
05-21-2015 , 11:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
National and American Leagues, imo. I have a feeling they're gonna stoop to flashy, crowd-pleasing gimmicks like the DH over there. Nobody cares about the purity of the game anymore.
I'm think perhaps two brand new threads June 1 and we'll see how posters migrate if there are two. Then we will have contests between them for supremacy and lols.

Last edited by spanktehbadwookie; 05-21-2015 at 11:46 PM. Reason: Believable?
05-21-2015 , 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Crunching a bit from phone but this isn't unreasonable or a stretch.

Dibs and gizmo both want the other to stop and both most likely realise they were behaving in a way they would rather not.

Dibs may have started it but he has also unilaterally stopped. Gizmo can follow suit even if she sees it as calling a bluff.
I mentioned this a while ago, but at this point, she's the one stalking him, not the other way around. I can only assume she has a crush.
05-22-2015 , 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Having two bad poster threads is an interesting accidental experiment.
We could have had three, but nooooooo, the Shamester can have his, but not the Trolley.

UNREAL!

De-Green spanktehbadwookie!!!1!
05-22-2015 , 12:24 AM
My inner-clown weaps.

We could have three, because much else political in our system is boiled down to 2, may as well organize organically into 3 groups of bad posters and ride the wave of whatever happens by crossing the dualistic conformity boundary.
05-22-2015 , 07:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Thanks.

This is why I want you in on the workgroup for serious unchained forum business. You have experience and set example which speaks for finer articulated lines of behavior that would be unacceptable in mutual poster insult combat. Discussion for the workgroup would centered around what could be reflected in a reasonably crafted rule to address the issue.
So the guy who doesn't even want people to acknowledge his own unacceptable behavior is going to workshop up a framework with the guy who offered a totally insincere apology after bragging about sexually harassing another poster and threatening to do it again.
05-22-2015 , 07:50 AM
a workgroup for serious unchained business, hahahahaha

****ing hell
05-22-2015 , 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
a workgroup for serious unchained business, hahahahaha

****ing hell
In my recollection, that format for forum-related discussion hasn't been tried yet. Also, getting posters from each side of the recent great spank divide together in such a discussion is easier to organize in a small group.

Would you like to participate?
05-22-2015 , 09:48 AM
I'm in Spank.
05-22-2015 , 09:56 AM
No thank you.
05-23-2015 , 02:20 PM
reziduer
05-24-2015 , 06:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
... People who made my language use their business may feel insulted at a person's response to the matter they did not expect. Bad luck. People have personal boundaries for a reason.

If you go fiddling with the way people talk, expecting more may happen than cheap lols is smarter.
spanktehbadwookie: he posts bad & writes funny !!!1!
05-27-2015 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
So I vote that on June 1 we just start [the Bad Poster thread] thread over.
My fellow Politards,

I would like to wish you all a belated welcome to v2: The Alternate Bad Posters Thread. We're not your father's Bad Poster thread, like that tired old one currently known as TBD. We're new, light-weight, improved, inspired by the new ElliotR era, and fully ready for June 1st !!!1!

You have a choice which thread to bring your bad posters news to. Please, consider here, at v2: the only Bad Poster thread that stood up to the threats of opt-outs under the last regime, the thread that will never have any Silver_Man2 posts in it, the thread that, come next month... will be the future of Baja Politards.


To encourage new posters, there are two big promotions going on right now !!!1! First, here at v2, there's no need to stall around figuring out how to name who as it's title holder... unlike the disorganized and dying v1: the old thread. You can vote right now in the Re:*Colorful* alternate Bad Poster Thread Title election !!!1! thread.




Secondly, it's the gift of music !!!1! Who doesn't like music... and who doesn't like free? For a limited time, all new posters will receive their choice from the exclusive Mod's Gone Wrong collection.

Either Wookie music in honor of spanktehbadwookie, Circus music in honor of BruceZ, or Hawaiian music in honor of TomVeil... poster's choice !!!1!
05-27-2015 , 10:00 PM
There are many, many bad posters.
06-01-2015 , 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
By what process am I in the title [of v1: The Tired Old Bad Poster's Thread?... I thought the naming of the thread had taken on a more democratic process. We had a contest. Ikes won, fair and square...
Open PM to Deuces McKracken,

I'd like to personally welcome you to v2: The Alternative Bad Poster thread.

Unlike the tired, old v1 (now entitled "Deuces"), here ITT the democratic process is respected. The odious ikestoys was the default... not only as the pre-fork incumbent (excepting the perma-banned thekid345), but also because he was the most recent (in fact only) duly elected title holder. Just yesterday, an actual vote here in Baja Politards 100% legitimated ikestoys holding the Bad Poster Title.

You are #5 in all-time posts in old, bloated and tired v1. You were the #1 seed, and made it into the finals, of the first Bad Poster tournament. That kinda volume, and that kinda 'heal' star-power... that's exactly what the new, nimble and excited v2: The Alternate Bad Poster thread needs to put it over-the-top. Think of the Fox Network getting the NFL !!!1!

So, how about it... you gotta choice of where you post your Bad Poster takes. Ditch the tired and bloated v1, which un-democratically targets you. Please, bring your Bad Poster hot takes and posts here, instead !!!1! Besides, what other thread offers the gift of free music*...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
There are many, many bad posters.
Good point.

Would you like your gift of free music*, from the Mods Gone Bad Collection, to be TomVeil style, BruceZ style, or spanktehbadwookie style ??


* Free music for new posters. Limited time only
06-05-2015 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianNit
Other than Nielsio, who are the bad former P/PU posters who have been abandoned P/PU or been banned?

That's what the six year tradition of the Odi Awards memorialize. Besides ikestoys, General Tsao & AlexM (now injoke), the remaining long-gone winners are a historical whos-who of extrememly odious bad posters:

 Odious PosterPostsFrom...To...
Borodog254632004-1-182014-1-20
See
Below
Nielsio234022005-8-142013-5-25
TomVeil193742006-10-92011-8-31
BruceZ118162002-9-32014-9-3
snagglepuss72692006-1-242012-6-24
zan nen43772007-3-182011-12-23
Montius42242009-4-272012-1-22
Silver_Man233292012-8-292014-7-22
sards15472006-5-142013-7-13
Adam the Ant7512008-2-12011-3-24

Speaking of the odious Nielsio, it seems he was too stupid to upload an avatar. So I have tried substituting in the past the banal 'ACism' symbol he actually created instead. However, I guess V isn't for 'voluntarily' paying your ISP, as every link to this banal system seems to go bad... really quickly (or maybe Nielsio is just really diligent about enforcing his copyright).

Again... I'm 100% sure this dude was political Astro-Turfing here at 2+2. From Wikipedia...

Quote:

Nielsio - Own work
The V for Voluntary symbol was created in 2007 in search for a new symbol that would capture the essence of the anarcho-capitalist movement and also carry a more positive message than other existing symbols. The name is a play on the phrase 'V for Vendetta'. But where Vendetta stresses vengeance and violence, Voluntary stresses peace and looking forwards, not backwards. The colors of the symbol are yellow (or gold) and black. Yellow is a reference to gold, which was the market chosen money. So it's a reference to free market money, and by extension the free market and capitalism. Black is a reference to anarchy. Anarchy, or an-anarchy, means no rulers. This means that no person should have forceful control over the life of another person. The shape at the top of the symbol represents a handshake, which is the most typical expression of a voluntary agreement...

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. You are free:

to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
06-05-2015 , 11:43 AM
I strenuously object to you using that avatar to represent SM2.

That is all.
06-05-2015 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
I strenuously object to you using that avatar to represent SM2.

That is all.
Duly noted, and dismissed.

Dude, you won two Odi Awards, each with it's own avatar... one as AlexM and one as ColbertFan. Just like Nielsio, poor odious Silver_Man2 wasn't smart enough to upload an avatar... so he has none. Don't you believe in sharing ??

Besides... just change ColbertFan's avatar, no big deal. I'd suggest using this...


ETA: I had a little Copy/Pasta fail, and left off one of the now perma-banned Odi Award winners from the list above... LirvA: 42865 odious posts, 2007-9-30 to 2013-11-27.

Last edited by Shame Trolly !!!1!; 06-05-2015 at 12:04 PM. Reason: ETA: how soon we forget...

      
m