Quote:
Originally Posted by auralex14
Logically, it should be one of the least complicated issues.
Put aside for the moment that innocent people have most likely been put to death (a strong argument against in and of itself); the reasoning behind 'X is so wrong, if you do it, we'll do X to you' is dubious at best.
What makes it complicated is because it's hard to be philosophically consistent either side you choose. I don't believe that the government should be able to tell you what to do, in general. I also don't believe an embryo is a human being. I can't define on what day that embryo does become a human being. Therefore I can't define when an abortion is actually murder.
Also, lives are lost every day to other causes. If preventing death is our #1 goal, then we can change many many things to help achieve that. For example, we knew for a fact that lowering the speed limit will save lives. That isn't up for debate. The question is how many deaths are acceptable to us because we want to drive over 55 miles an hour?
If you believe life starts at conception and don't support the death penalty, then maybe I can understand you saying it's an easy choice. I'm not in that boat, so for me it's a gut-wrenching debate and one I do not really wish to explore. It makes me sad and angry and every other emotion, I just try to avoid it.