Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Moderation !!! Moderation

09-02-2014 , 08:35 PM
Feel free to complain about *PU* moderation here. If I think an issue has already been explained I may just ignore you.

Last edited by jjshabado; 09-02-2014 at 08:59 PM.
09-02-2014 , 08:42 PM
You are at least the 3rd worst moderator this forum has ever had.
09-02-2014 , 08:50 PM
**** just got real
09-02-2014 , 08:56 PM
If you don't ban silverman3 fast enough be warned you are pretty much a racist and there will be legions of crybabies after you.
09-02-2014 , 08:58 PM
and then crybaby legion crybabies who cry about the legion of crybabies

because yo dawg, we heard you like crybabies
09-02-2014 , 09:12 PM
LK, why the 2nd account?
09-02-2014 , 09:17 PM
You cannot ignore that which is already ignored.
09-02-2014 , 09:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anais
and then crybaby legion crybabies who cry about the legion of crybabies

because yo dawg, we heard you like crybabies
Someone has to watch over the watchmen.

If there were no more watchmen, I wouldn't need to watch over them.

Are you done your verbal spat over spank yet?
09-02-2014 , 09:30 PM
Hmm like 4 hours of modding and the number of stickies has already tripled......
09-02-2014 , 09:31 PM
Better?
09-02-2014 , 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
Someone has to watch over the watchmen.

If there were no more watchmen, I wouldn't need to watch over them.

Are you done your verbal spat over spank yet?
You brought it up, boss. You're gonna have to own up to it
09-02-2014 , 09:48 PM
Who's, not whose. Can we get a mod who is capable of a respectable showing in a grammar rodeo?
09-02-2014 , 09:51 PM
Let it be known that I respond to valid criticism.
09-02-2014 , 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anais
and then crybaby legion crybabies who cry about the legion of crybabies

because yo dawg, we heard you like crybabies
What about the crybabies who cry about the cry babies, who cry about the crybabies?
09-02-2014 , 10:05 PM
I think you should let anyone with any post count start new threads. This place needs new blood. Why restrict it?
09-02-2014 , 10:07 PM
Anybody can start new threads. I'm just not going to do the "mod your own thread" thing with new users.
09-02-2014 , 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
Better?
Ty much better.

Pro move will be to combine the rules thread and this thread. Good exercise in using the thread tools and title change function.
09-02-2014 , 11:39 PM
I'm not gonna PM you but I want a self moderated thread that everyone but me is banned from. TIA
09-02-2014 , 11:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
I'm not gonna PM you but I want a self moderated thread that everyone but me is banned from. TIA
Done. I made it one of those hidden threads that no one but you can see. Enjoy!
09-02-2014 , 11:49 PM
Ty for the clarification.


One last question. Am I allowed to call Dids a giant pussy still?
09-03-2014 , 08:45 AM
IDK, the dude is a mod, he must be turrible, right?
09-03-2014 , 08:53 AM
Hmm.. I now know how to merge threads. I just can't find the threaten pvn over PM button.

Spoiler:
Too soon?
09-03-2014 , 09:44 AM
Your distinction, in the rules, between racist and non-racist statements is unclear.

Quote:
The line I draw on racism (and other hate/insensitive speech) is that there's a difference between an idea/position and an ignorant attack. "Giraffes should be placed at the back of zoos because nobody wants to look at them" is an idea that can be debated. "Giraffes are tall necked freaks" is an attack that's not really worth discussing. Ideas are open to be discussed while attacks aren't acceptable.
Inherent to example #1 is that "nobody wants to look at giraffes". But that is just as racist--in the sense of being insensitively cruel about the nature of a class of individuals--as "giraffes are tall necked freaks". Yet only the second is prohibited.

If you have no basis for distinguishing between racism and non-racism then all your moderation on that account is arbitrary.
09-03-2014 , 10:28 AM
As always, the real question is just how racist you can be without being called racist.

littlevictory,
Spoiler:
All moderation is arbitrary.
09-03-2014 , 10:56 AM
The debateable part is "So they should be placed at the back of the zoo". Maybe it's unfair to giraffes, but maybe the tradeoff is that that's how to maximize zoo profits. So why shoudn't the zoo owner be allowed to do that?

But like MrWookie said - it's obvious that all moderation is arbitrary. The example is to help you understand how I look at things and not to be a definitive rule.

If you're unsure if something is too racist - just don't post it. Or PM me and ask.

      
m