Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
One of the more enlightening aspects of following PU is seeing how irate the Trumpers continue to be even in victory. Wil should be tickled pink at all the money he made, but he still posts like someone pissed in his Cheerios. TS, who somehow never took advantage of a big moneymaking play, is the only one who seems celebratory.
Wil isn't a Trumpster. He's in the "left wing, but sane" group. Real Trumpsters are tickled pink.
As for me, I think it's hilarious how wrong the "experts" were. They were even told they were wrong, and why they were wrong, and they were so dopey/stuck in their own little circles of feedback looping groupthink that they didn't even consider it.
I didn't bet it because I didn't see excellent odds. Clinton at 60% or so was about even money. Which means, if you had a functioning brain, you shouldn't have taken Clinton above 40% or so. There were deranged clowns putting serious money on Clinton at 70%, 80%, thinking they had a sure thing. The lefties in vanilla lacked a functioning brain.
Trump may have been a good bet at 20%. Not sure. The trading I do involves better risk profiles so I saw no reason to put any money on it.
Quote:
I think it's very difficult for the right's culture of perpetual victimhood to adjust to being in the winners circle.
This is a solid troll man. Victimhood culture exists overwhelmingly on the left, both in policies, theory/academia, and media commentary.
Quote:
I actually sorta expect AM radio and FOX and the rest of the grievance industry to potentially lose viewers over the next few years.
Some of the talkback radio is grievance, for sure. When Trump creates jobs and fixes the racism, stupid policies and grievance-pandering of the left, I don't imagine you'll be wrong.