Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! January Personal Attacks Thread !!! January Personal Attacks Thread

01-05-2017 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Yeah, champ, you command diversity of thought so well you can't even go here, http://www.thesaurus.com/, and pick a more apt word to describe a person intolerant of those with different opinions, a word without the doublespeak baggage.
Monster ****ing irony, dude? You're part of a troupe of clowns who scream "racist" and "homophobe" repeatedly at the slightest provocation, like obsessive mental patients - yet look at how broad those terms are. Here is what I said earlier:

Quote:
The trouble with "racist" is its imprecision. Racist covers all meanings from:

- Thinks the evidence suggests that (e.g.) black people are less intelligent on average, but is as against discrimination as a leftist.
- Thinks less of other races, and is not discriminatory
- Thinks less of other races, discriminates
- Wants other races to be gone from the US
- Wants to do hate crimes against other races

That's a huge umbrella of vastly different mental, moral and intellectual states included under one term. "Racist" lumps people in with all those, with no discrimination.

To the above - what normal, non insane people people call "racist", the left has added the following as "racist"

- Doesn't agree that the reason (e.g.) black people are where they are is entirely whitey's fault
- Doesn't take the minority side in a minority/majority issue (even where, if we were color blind, we probably wouldn't take the minority's side)
- Lots more

I realize some guys like Wookie are so far down the rabbit hole of crazy that they think the above is 100% racist, and that's that. But most people aren't. Language is about communication and shared meaning, and "racist" is such a horribly imprecise term there is never a good reason to use it except when someone fits the definitions that normal people ascribe to.

In my view it's used, where not justified, knowing it means the top set of definitions to most people, to bash people over the head into agreeing with your stance. That's little more than cowardly and anti-intellectual.
Yet here you are complaining about "doublespeak baggage" of fraction of the degree even if I grant you everything you believe? Are you ****ing serious? Physician, heal thyself, and then come preaching. The use of "bigot" here is perfectly normal.
Quote:
Or, wait...

Maybe the doublespeak baggage is the entire game, the parlor trick obfuscation needed to even have a point.
No, not at all. It's not my fault you have a poor education and are not aware what words mean, or more importantly, what concepts mean. The concept of a "bigot" far predates its modern alternative usage as "someone not liking minorities". It used to be an ugly word - someone intolerant of different opinions - which used to be (and still is, in polite circles) considered an ugly thing when taken to the kind of extreme that regular P posters do, apparently in their daily lives.
Quote:
Am I getting warmer?
You've always been glowing cinder hot.
Quote:
You know what's so offensive about people like yourself? That some small part of you actually believes your simple bull**** will work on half-way intelligent people. I know your schtick is to play pied-piper for the derprats, but somewhere in the back of your little mind you think you're gonna sock a few dingers out of the park.
I'm more right about what I post than you are about what you post. You're not even in the game, most of the thing, yet you think you're getting checkmates left and right. It's...I don't even have a word.
Quote:
Like, somebody with a functioning frontal lobe is gonna have their eureka moment and go, "Hey, TS is right, SuperUberBob really is The Real Bigot!"
SuperUberBob's statement above is a classic bigot statement/worldview. You and your leftist pals in P are so far down the bigot hole you don't even know what normal is.
Quote:
Somebody in some factory somewhere slaved away to build the electronic device you're wasting your life on. That's a modern tragedy.
Weren't you the mod of BBV? Isn't that a tad ironic?
01-05-2017 , 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Seeing the good in people is far more important than being hateful or put off by a set of views.
This from a guy who barks "cucks" at every opportunity. No self-awareness in these types.
01-05-2017 , 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regret$
Tooth is a bigot and a hypocrite, more so than the average 7.0 plaster.
Strong and clear minded is more to the point.

The man finds his family odious because of Trump ?? Being open to the consideration that the other person has something to say that may indeed help one's self even if you think you've got the right and compelling answer.


Even the most malign tomfoolery can offer virtue to another but it doesn't mean that one has to agree with the self same position.

A person can be the most insightful and reasoned being on the planet but he can still improve in comprehension by listening to others of supposed lesser ability . This doesn't hurt , its about the individual himself, not the other but soon we're getting into preaching and so I'll stop.

And yes, I didn't see it previously but seeing the best in others is the road to wisdom and that's called "love". The above is a variation on the same theme.
01-05-2017 , 09:33 AM
The guy who hates Muslims is calling SuperUberBob a bigot because he wants to communicate better with his family. 2018 is already turning out to be a hell of a year.
01-05-2017 , 09:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
The guy who hates Muslims is calling SuperUberBob a bigot because he wants to communicate better with his family. 2018 is already turning out to be a hell of a year.
This is a 40 to 50 % lie; it looks like he wants to enforce his will upon his family. The worst lies are not the 100 % lies but the nuanced lies which have some tenor of truth but are of the type that breed hate and all its sisters.
01-05-2017 , 09:42 AM
I generally think that people who do not post regularly in this forum should be excluded from personal attacks in this forum. Going after SuperUberBob is a clown move and I see no reason why criticism of his post couldn't have taken place in the forum in which it was posted.
01-05-2017 , 09:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlo
Being open to the consideration that the other person has something to say that may indeed help one's self even if you think you've got the right and compelling answer.
Why do I have to be open to 2+2=5?

I admit that I am a bigot against things that are obviously wrong. I will continue to be a bigot against wrong things. You should be too.

The question of how to deal with people who believe obviously wrong things isn't limited to Trump supporters. But Bob's example clearly discusses people believing in their own set of facts. Not necessarily because they are dumb or illogical, but because of motivated reasoning.

What if Bob's family were a bunch of 9/11 truthers? Should he just sit back and "learn" from them. If not, then aren't you a bigot against 9/11 truthers? If so, good.
01-05-2017 , 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlo
This is a 40 to 50 % lie; it looks like he wants to enforce his will upon his family. The worst lies are not the 100 % lies but the nuanced lies which have some tenor of truth but are of the type that breed hate and all its sisters.
You are just making this up.
01-05-2017 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
I generally think that people who do not post regularly in this forum should be excluded from personal attacks in this forum. Going after SuperUberBob is a clown move and I see no reason why criticism of his post couldn't have taken place in the forum in which it was posted.
Agree with you, but still. I get personally attacked - in fact shamelessly libeled in the worst ways against the very rules of that forum - in regular P. Why aren't regular P fair game here?
01-05-2017 , 09:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
The guy who hates Muslims is calling SuperUberBob a bigot because he wants to communicate better with his family.
2018 is already turning out to be a hell of a year.
Where on Earth do you get that I "hate" Muslims?

Islam is a terrible ideology that ruins every society and oppresses women in every society where it gains a majority. The only exception is where the large number of fundamentalists are viciously oppressed by dictators or extreme and constant secular military intervention in politics (e.g. Turkey).

That doesn't mean I hate Muslims. Quite the opposite. I feel sorry for many of them, especially the women, who have no choice or freedom.
01-05-2017 , 09:55 AM
ITT people are obviously wrong for supporting Trump.

Well guess what, they obviously think that you are wrong for supporting Clinton.

stalemate?

Or are are regressive Liberals just by virtue of their ideology right by default?

This kind of reasoning has lead to many oppressive dictatorships throughout history. In many ways you guys have become what you hate.
01-05-2017 , 10:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Where on Earth do you get that I "hate" Muslims?

Islam is a terrible ideology that ruins every society and oppresses women in every society where it gains a majority. The only exception is where the large number of fundamentalists are viciously oppressed by dictators or extreme and constant secular military intervention in politics (e.g. Turkey).

That doesn't mean I hate Muslims. Quite the opposite. I feel sorry for many of them, especially the women, who have no choice or freedom.
Even if I believed you, you're still a bigot.
01-05-2017 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
ITT people are obviously wrong for supporting Trump.
Nope, that's not what Bob said. Please read more carefully.

Quote:
Or are are regressive Liberals just by virtue of their ideology right by default?

This kind of reasoning has lead to many oppressive dictatorships throughout history. In many ways you guys have become what you hate.
Not reading things has led to many oppressive dictatorships.

You really smashed an argument that no one was making. And did it with an arrogance that is ****ing hilarious.
01-05-2017 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
I generally think that people who do not post regularly in this forum should be excluded from personal attacks in this forum. Going after SuperUberBob is a clown move and I see no reason why criticism of his post couldn't have taken place in the forum in which it was posted.
I have always generally agreed with that. For the politics forums it's defaulting to being allowed because it always has been, it's going both ways and there's so much cross over and common ground. It's not my top priority to worry about politics posters as it's a clear part of what was expected when bad poster thread etc were created. Even so if anyone wants to contact me directly I will try to help.

The rules on how opt outs will work will be nice and complicated to prevent opt outs being used to shield behind while attacking others. In practice it will be fairly simple.
01-05-2017 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoQuarter
I posted a personal attack (against a douchebag that continues to religiously attack) in the January Personal Attacks thread, the post was deleted and I was temp banned for doing so

Oh and ummm...

Spoiler:
Title of thread obv misleading
Must have been a really long temp ban. How many hours?
01-05-2017 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Pretty amazing. SuperUberBob is like the classic definition of a bigot in this passage. Notice the support from the other bigots in P that he receives, rather than calling out his bigotry or trying to ameliorate it. Note the absolute certainty, like all intellectual/moral fascists, that he is correct and this family are wrong and need his help to correct their errant ways.

P should probably be shut down now that we have chezlaw mainstreaming this forum. It's a breeding ground for bigotry, hatred and intolerance and has been for a long time.
Yes his bigotry of dumb people is much worse than your bigotry of people of non-white colors and people of non-heterosexual persuasions.

For the record I am also bigoted against people who were dumb enough to vote for trump. It's a pretty egregious and ignorant thing for a person to have done and it's not really defensible.
01-05-2017 , 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Nope, that's not what Bob said. Please read more carefully.



Not reading things has led to many oppressive dictatorships.

You really smashed an argument that no one was making. And did it with an arrogance that is ****ing hilarious.
I just read it again. Clearly his sentiment is that he needs to get his Trump supporting relatives to see the light and change their erroneous ways. No factual statements are made, just an arrogant attitude of them thinking the wrong thoughts was displayed.
01-05-2017 , 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Yes his bigotry of dumb people is much worse than your bigotry of people of non-white colors and people of non-heterosexual persuasions.
How do you know that they are dumb people? You sound like a bigot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman

For the record I am also bigoted against people who were dumb enough to vote for trump. It's a pretty egregious and ignorant thing for a person to have done and it's not really defensible.
Oh I see, just voting for Trump makes you dumb in the eyes of the regressive left. You people really are irredeemable deplorables.

Last edited by Marn; 01-05-2017 at 10:23 AM.
01-05-2017 , 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
I just read it again. Clearly his sentiment is that he needs to get his Trump supporting relatives to see the light and change their erroneous ways. No factual statements are made, just an arrogant attitude of them thinking the wrong thoughts was displayed.
Try a third time, I guess:

Quote:
I try to engage in discussion with factual information and for some reason they seem to be unable to accept any statement I make even with reliable sources backing me up. It is the whole idea that they feel that they are entitled to their own facts. So they just deny everything that goes against their beliefs.
01-05-2017 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I have always generally agreed with that. For the politics forums it's defaulting to being allowed because it always has been, it's going both ways and there's so much cross over and common ground. It's not my top priority to worry about politics posters as it's a clear part of what was expected when bad poster thread etc were created. Even so if anyone wants to contact me directly I will try to help.

The rules on how opt outs will work will be nice and complicated to prevent opt outs being used to shield behind while attacking others. In practice it will be fairly simple.
Yeah just to be clear I was being critical of the posters decision to x post not your decision to not address it, I don't think there's anything you should do with regard to this. Also as ToothSayer pointed out he gets criticized, reasonably in my view, in P and no one objects so I may just be off here.
01-05-2017 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
The guy who hates Muslims is calling SuperUberBob a bigot because he wants to communicate better with his family. 2018 is already turning out to be a hell of a year.
This, hypocrisy and bigotry to the extreme.
01-05-2017 , 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Yes his bigotry of dumb people is much worse than your bigotry of people of non-white colors and people of non-heterosexual persuasions.
Evidence for this???

Quote:
For the record I am also bigoted against people who were dumb enough to vote for trump. It's a pretty egregious and ignorant thing for a person to have done and it's not really defensible.
This is precisely how a bigot sounds. The facts don't support your contention. Plenty of smart people voted for Trump. Plenty of non-ignorant people voted for Trump. The differential in college degrees and who they voted for wasn't even that large, despite most humanities degrees being hard left indoctrination.

IQ, life success, hell, even college education, are barely different between the groups.

That you can't think of any compelling and intelligent reason that people might have voted for Trump says far more about your intelligence and open-mindedness than it does about Trump voters.
01-05-2017 , 10:28 AM
Just as an example: 67% of Trump supporters thought that unemployment went up under Obama.

Is it okay to point out that they are absolutely wrong, or is that "bigotry"?
01-05-2017 , 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Try a third time, I guess:
Read between the lines..

If the thread was about how to convince people of factual arguments then it is irrelevant if they are Trump supporters or not. In Bobs OP it was implied that supporting Trump is wrong and not only wrong but so wrong that he views them as lesser people because of their opinions. This is an arrogant and divisive attitude and will only turn those people further away from what he hopes to achieve.
01-05-2017 , 10:55 AM
But which is worse: believing a group of people is factually wrong and in denial of reality or stating that an entire religion of people support cousin ****ing?

      
m