Should change the title of the thread to, "How Can The Nanny State Better Govern Our Lives".

the government handing out money perpetuates poverty. its nice to have insurance for hard times but offering incentive to be unproductive gives you the results you should expect. this is demonstrated in communism. we need competition and there will be failures. trying to remove failure just creates more failure. its unavoidable. the best you can do is give people the freedom to succeed

libs have tried to play god and be everyone's daddy. its never going to work. people need an actual daddy. if you give money to single parents for the kids benefit, well then youre taking kids out of poverty, right? wrong

children born outside of marriage. numbers of single parent families are almost the same
http://www.familyfacts.org/charts/32...rdless-of-race

just created incentive for behavior that results in children in poverty.... and thats exactly what has happened

Eliminate the nanny is what you want, posters get that. Meanwhile the nanny state exists and is functional People have to deal with it and make the best of it.

The nanny in the context of a house hold makes perfect sense, the nanny of 300 million, one hell of a suuuuper nanny to make all those complex decisions. Suffices to say I think it'd be quicker to just eliminate the state.