Dodge a very basic yes/no question and write three paragraphs of nonsense. Standard.

Like, what does answering a yes/no question "on my terms" even mean? How would that differ from answering it on your terms? Again, a yes or a no is quite sufficient as an answer to the original question. Also, why is the premise of the question weak?

I didn't see your thread so can't comment on whether it was fair or not to close it. However, from reading your posts I know you have the tendency to make a lot of posts that are hard to understand. Maybe that is why it was closed, or that you hadn't put much thought into the quality of discussion that the post would likely generate? Have you considered lowering your posting frequency and putting more effort into making your posts easier to read?

As for perception of bias, well that's inevitable when human beings discuss politics.

That is simply not true. Numerous posters asked you to explain your decisions and reasoning because they didn't understand what you were doing. That is a basic fact.

I answered your question. Neither. You haven't strengthened your premise or given information which weakens mine. Why exactly are you participating here?

My gripe is with kerowo and his decision. He has offered nearly zero information support his opinion. I have provided multiple vectors of information to support my thread. PokerIMO's can unleash blame at me until exhausted but that is not the issue at hand.



Really PokerIMO's angry blame routine is like what kerowo is holding back. Once again their personal problem disliking my posts should not make problems for the moderation of the forum. Please deal with it and undeleted my post. You have full choice in the matter of acting on your dislike towards me.

So your answer to the question "Do you think you could do a better job at moderating than the current mods?" is "neither"?

Why did you choose that answer to the yes/no question, when other perfectly sensible and clear answers were "xylophone", "the colour purple" or "lamp"?

Why am I participating? I am participating to try to find the answer to why you are criticising forum moderation after you proved that you personally were not up to the task. Much easier to criticise others than do it yourself, eh?

Do you remember the first few years when you posted on 2+2, when your posts weren't always angry and bitter?

I do not recall at time you posted towards me that was not blameful.

No wonder you are way off mark, you have guessed my emotions incorrectly. If it helps I don't blame you for whatever it is your doing arguing in the thread, just because I point out you have a weak premise to base a question upon. It's really up to you to withdraw your weak premise or give it strength by intelligently place it in context of the topic and addressing my premise.

We all know the thread was deleted and we can all look at kerowo's posting about me since before he became mod and make a much smarter conclusion than a weak non-informative subjective comparison like you have.

Now the topic is kerowo's thread deleting decision, not your gossip and blame hobby.

Btw poker IMO if you think that highly of kerowo why not let him speak for himself about his own decisions. So far not much huh?

Even if am only half correct, undeleting the thread still works for anybody who wants it to work.

He already provided a perfectly adequate and reasonable explanation: he said he thought you were drunk. I saw that OP - neither the title nor the 1-sentence post had any context. It came across as nonsensical.

Instead of spending hours complaining about it, you could have invested a tiny fraction of all that time composing a decent OP that explained the nipple controversy and your position on it. If you do that I predict there's a 0% chance your thread will get locked or deleted no matter how much the mods don't like you.

What is it today with people demanding that their worthless content be respected and preserved?

That sounded like an excuse.

So he made some mistakes in a position of authority and won't even try to fix them.

FYI. My plans to drink beer this weekend got canceled. But I do know of a great local beer joint now, so I have heard.

We have found a common problem, terrible guessers.

There was no mistake; there's nothing to fix. Your post was ****. The easy solution is for you to own up to your own mistake and try again.

Jesus, spank. Would it really be so hard to make a real thread?

Jesus, it was a real thread. That's a problem. You are choosing to make it difficult and pretending that it was not a real thread along with kerowo.

I am dissapoint., but you are entitled to have a stupid, thoughtless opinion and indifference to kerowo's thoughtless and stupid ongoing behavior.

Pathetic censors. Take solace theduker and bunch of bitter trolls will still kiss your dumb, delicate asses.

Your delicate opinion sucks. Disgraceful and dishonorable that you shill for these people.

Hey geniuses that thread was one of dozens of minimal OP threads. It's about your inability to be impartial as mods because of your personal dislike. You have made it almost undeniable and you are the source of that problem with out a doubt.

Even a Moran can figure out if you don't like a thread don't participate, and if you don't like a threadmaker don't delete their threads. That is the wrong way.

I will look for tells that you all have given up your personal problems towards me and a clear sign would be to restore the thread I created, complete with the heart icon.

Lol, spank spamming itt

Paul D spamming his usual non-information that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Jokes is on you because the only reason I am posting here this weekend is because I can't post in a thread I created due to a mistaken moderator who has a handful of blameful, argumentative, and downright stupid supporters.

I could be merrily posting about freeing the nipples, but someone took action on a weak, partial premise and created a opportunity with merit for me to post in this thread instead.

Please list the last dozen such threads. Meta-PU threads about posters/mods don't count.

Why Threads don't count? Can't you look yourself, it is after all right here.

You are aware that free the nipple is partially a movement around that simple meme. That is a thing.

Did you know I put thought into minimalism? You should, I do demonstrate as such. Art and creativity takes effort. You can also guess that I do based on the fact have explained the worth of my post from several vectors . The criticisms of my post comes from one thin vector and, a bunch of spankblame, and some guesses.

Do you double-check the merits of any arguments?

Meta-threads about other politards shouldn't be counted as they are clearly within the PU mission statement of allowing attacks on other posters. 90% of them are bad threads, but they are permissible bad threads.

Maybe I have looked and find your claim of dozens of similar OPs not being punished to be as hyperbolic as Donald Trump complaining about Mexican rapists. In other forums, I often ask questions to suggest that hyperbolic claims are the wrong way to think about things. For example, in strat forums, I often ask people how they would play in certain scenarios when they say that someone should always do a certain play (such as raising before the flop with AA in NLHE). In the absence of the evidence of the actual OP of your nipple thread, I would like to see what you consider to be other threads with less valuable OPs that were permitted to breathe. The ball would then be in the court of your critics to explain how your OP would be worse.

As a fan of Mark Rothko, I can appreciate minimalistic art. You're no Rothko.

I think keeping the discussion focused on my individual thread is better. Because it is simple to agree to restore the thread and apparently that would not be a mistaken decision based on the merits which have been offered on the whole so far.

Chalk it up to an brief education/misunderstanding in modern communication.

It was a challenge AsianNit. I chose " it's a thing" because it is minimal, doesn't interfere with the 'free the nipple' meme and it is PU referential.

I could have posted a bunch male nipple pics and yelled come at me bro. I strive for E's for effort obviously.

If I cite the anarchy thread will my thread and respect for the mods be restored? Bitches?

If you can credibly claim that it was an attempt to troll proph, it might be resurrected.

Seems like a stupid post that looks like it belongs in BBV4L.

Mods are only usually wrong for a few reasons and they are most obvious as an ACer in a politics forum.

Why are you posting instead of kerowo and did you forgot politics unchained is the forum where we are at? Home of the anarchy thread.