In another brilliant PR move, Google has decided to change Abraham Lincoln's party affiliation in its:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017...litical-party/



Just after the American Inventor bruh-ha-ha, now this.

Good job Google. Why walk slowly towards the cliff when you can just jump right off.

And guess what is says for Thomas Jefferson?

Democrat-Republican Party.

https://www.google.com/search?safe=o...k1.Nx4dELk-W2I

Democrats can't be proud of their own heritage even. Wow!

You know you can get Google to suggest almost anything, right? People have been doing this for years.

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/influ...est-35747.html
https://www.searchenginenews.com/sam...gest-heres-how


Edit: lol


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...(United_States)


You Trumpers are amazing!

It's not autosuggests, it's the results.

Go type it in - do the search.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democr...publican_Party

Click the wikipedia links after you search and you'll learn something! Amazing, right?

"Wtf were the whigs? Trannies had their own party back then? ****ing bull****!"


lololol JiggyMac

youalmosthadit .jpg

Yes, i'm sure on most standardized tests, the correct answer to the party affiliations of the mentioned candidates are: Democrat-Republican and National Unity Party.

JFC!

I mean, the nuance is interesting, but not entirely relevant.

You can't just change the names of the parties. Who's revising history now?

Yes, apparently you can.

Great thread.

Well, we just had the American Inventors debacle (don't give me that African-American bull****. Why not Native-Americans or do they just not invent things)?

https://www.google.com/search?safe=o...ican+Inventors

You know what's fascinating though? If you change just one letter: American Investors:https://www.google.com/search?safe=o...ican+Investors

I suppose the GoogleJWs haven't gotten around to those search results yet.

Put down the ether.

No, this is inaccurate. The Democratic-Republican Party was a forerunner of the modern Democratic Party, but it collapsed in the mid 1820s and it was the Jackson-aligned factions that then went on to form the Democratic Party of today. I would not consider Jefferson a Democratic Party president anymore than I would consider Henry Clay a Republican.

Wait - didn't you say you were education? What do Primary School students write in their standardized test answers in regards to Thomas Jefferson's party?

Why did the current Democrat Party hold Jefferson-Jackson dinners (until they got tired of being reminded of their slave ownership)?:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffer...%93Jackson_Day

The current Republican Party found is traced back to 1854. Are you suggesting Clay joined the party after his death in 1852? Historians also consider the National Unity Party as the Republican Party and a part of its lineage.

It is the current and words don't have meanings. Hurray!

I don't know, but I would imagine they follow standard usage and regard the first Democratic Party president as Andrew Jackson and Jefferson a Democratic-Republican.

You don't understand. The Republican Party was formed in part out of former factions from the Whig Party, i.e. Henry Clay's party. Similarly, the Democratic Party was formed out of some former factions of the Democratic-Republican Party. But just as the Whig Party and the Republican Party are distinct parties, so are the Democratic Party and the Democratic-Republican Party. Maybe you are being misled by the similar name? Or, sometimes people will claim that the modern Democratic Party goes back to the eighteenth-century, but you have to realize they are talking about regional parties there - eg the New York State Democratic Pary.

Here is Google's Veterans Day doodle.



80% of veterans are white males...

Stop dodging the question. What is the correct answer in Primary School to the following question: What was Thomas Jefferson's political party?


I think YOU don't understand. You know, I've defended Wikipedia as being more accurate than encyclopedias, but I'm beginning to rethink my position:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dem...publican-Party

"Democratic-Republican Party, originally (1792–98) Republican Party, first opposition political party in the United States. Organized in 1792 as the Republican Party, its members held power nationally between 1801 and 1825. It was the direct antecedent of the present Democratic Party."

Are you suggesting that Democrats have been hosting Republican-Democrat dinners all this time???

I guess you think I trying to make some kind of partisan point here. Let me assure you, I greatly prefer Jefferson to Jackson, whom I regard as a very poor president and an evil man. Anyway, I am ideologically much more sympathetic to the Whigs than to the Democratic Party of the nineteenth-century. The correct answer to your question is the Democratic-Republican Party, as I said before.

Lol. What was that about words and meanings? Maybe you should take a gander at "antecedent."

lol google

letting sjw's into your company, brin must be happy with the money he already has and is beyond giving a ****

I'm guessing while you would be 'technically' correct (the best kind of correct, eh?), you'd be unlikely to lose points for simply putting the Democrat Party.

Damn, Democrats were duped into holding Republican-Democrat dinners this whole time. ****ing idiots, amiright?

goolag