Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year !!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year

01-07-2017 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Haven't you claimed previously to be part of "the left" or liberal, etc? You've insulted the left about 35 times in the last 24 hours.

By the way, the right's platform this cycle included having porn declared a public health crisis, their politicians at the state level want ridiculous religious freedom laws which are basically a license to discriminate, they pass bathroom bills, and they constantly try to circumvent abortion law by coming up with any nitpicky little violation in order to shut down clinics.

On social issues, they're the embarrassment.
No one said idiocy on the right ended. That being said, the left is downright dangerous at this point, and they need to be fought against.

I am a liberal, and I'm embarrassed to say it. I don't want to be associated with people like kerowo or fly or LG. They are awful, disgusting people. Ew.
01-07-2017 , 07:17 PM
Quote:
Is this some kind of a joke? My claim is that there aren't enough letters, not that there are too many. It used to be LGB. Now it's LGBTI. That's a move in the right direction. Why not keep moving in the right direction? What people are we excluding from minority protections and championing and noticing that we've forgotten? Is that a bad question to ask?
TS, people are not required to humor your obvious disingenuous bull****. One way that it becomes super obvious you are disingenuous is when your argument doesn't seem to have any actual point.

There's this smugness to your posts about this **** like you're totally fooling the libtards when you pretend to be some champion of gay rights. Man, you ain't. Tough break.
01-07-2017 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
TS, people are not required to humor your obvious disingenuous bull****. One way that it becomes super obvious you are disingenuous is when your argument doesn't seem to have any actual point.

There's this smugness to your posts about this **** like you're totally fooling the libtards when you pretend to be some champion of gay rights. Man, you ain't. Tough break.
The left is non critical of Islam, who are amazingly anti-lgbt. Is that kind of like the same thing you are claiming?
01-07-2017 , 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
The left is non critical of Islam, who are amazingly anti-lgbt. Is that kind of like the same thing you are claiming?
The hard left is not only non-critical of Islamic terrorism, they rabidly support it. I suspect it's because they share the same goals. To eradicate all opposition. If they get their way, then only two will be left standing. It's cute that the leftists think they will win that final battle.
01-07-2017 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
I'm so ahead of you guys. I'm an LGBTQIACDEFHJKMNOPRSUVWXYZ supporter. I've got the rainbow of minority activism covered! Nothing more to do! My moral goodness is complete. I've reached the oneness with morality that Buddhists strive for. I love all things.

Over/under on LGBT having at least 8 letters within 10 years?
I was recently at a comedy gig where quite possibly all of the crowd were LGBTQR4
01-07-2017 , 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I was recently at a comedy gig where quite possibly all of the crowd were LGBTQR2D2
01-07-2017 , 07:59 PM
4?
01-07-2017 , 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
TS, people are not required to humor your obvious disingenuous bull****. One way that it becomes super obvious you are disingenuous is when your argument doesn't seem to have any actual point.
My point, beneath the absurdist humor, is that as liberals, what gets our empathy and attention should be a lot broader than LGTBI. If our goal is to reduce subjective unfair suffering, rather than shove it in the face of those horrible righties whose existence we don't like, LGB doesn't rate in the top 20 most important issues in this world. TI doesn't rate in the top 200, and in fact there's a strong case we're doing net harm there by encouraging body dismorphia that leads to deeply unhappy outcomes rather than treatment.

The range of what receives actioned empathy is cringingly narrow right now for most SJWs. And completely misdirected.
Quote:
There's this smugness to your posts about this **** like you're totally fooling the libtards when you pretend to be some champion of gay rights. Man, you ain't. Tough break.
The smugness comes from the utter hilarity of me being strongly and obviously pro-gay rights, and people attacking me as a homophobe however they can. I care about gays and others enough to risk being labeled a homophobe, however.
01-07-2017 , 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
The left is non critical of Islam, who are amazingly anti-lgbt.
Tolerance for religion and no easy answers for prejudice is more apparent from my view than an absence of criticism.
01-07-2017 , 08:58 PM
Republicans have a gay! They can't be homophobic now!
01-07-2017 , 09:00 PM
Quote:
the absurdist humor,
What's absurd about LGBTQ, uh, existing as an acronym? Seriously you guys keep on writing like that acronym is some ****ing official government acronym that gets updated or something("y'all see them bureaucrats in Washington done added a Q to that list of people we ain't allowed to hate no more? Thanks, Obama"), naw, it's just a way to describe a marginalized demographic. That's why your "absurdist" humor seems to lack jokes, the premise of your humor is bewilderment and anger at a diverse and tolerant world.

Quote:
rather than shove it in the face of those horrible righties whose existence we don't like,
And instantly the veil drops. What's being shoved in the right's faces? SilverMan used this language too, it's very common on the right when discussing LGBTQ issues.

I'm not going to prime this by telling you how I and other liberals interpret it, I'll be fair.

Who is shoving what in the right's faces? What does the acronym have to do with any of this ****?
01-07-2017 , 09:06 PM
fly and and i have never had a direct conversation. should we?
01-07-2017 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
fly and and i have never had a direct conversation. should we?
Why not.
01-07-2017 , 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
My point, beneath the absurdist humor, is that as liberals, what gets our empathy and attention should be a lot broader than LGTBI. If our goal is to reduce subjective unfair suffering, rather than shove it in the face of those horrible righties whose existence we don't like, LGB doesn't rate in the top 20 most important issues in this world. TI doesn't rate in the top 200, and in fact there's a strong case we're doing net harm there by encouraging body dismorphia that leads to deeply unhappy outcomes rather than treatment.

The range of what receives actioned empathy is cringingly narrow right now for most SJWs. And completely misdirected.

The smugness comes from the utter hilarity of me being strongly and obviously pro-gay rights, and people attacking me as a homophobe however they can. I care about gays and others enough to risk being labeled a homophobe, however.

**** off. You use the term SJW which is a pretty good indication you aren't liberal. If we didn't have your position on LGBT people to show us you aren't any more liberal than Wil. Say some more stupid **** like we should support everybody not the LGBT people! That's funny you ****ing bigot.
01-07-2017 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
4?
I'm interested as to why you didn't question the 'R'
01-07-2017 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Fly not.
FYP
01-07-2017 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Peter
Older gays don't like the term bc they were beat up over it when they were young. Younger gays use the term bc they have owned it. There's a pretty big debate between the two groups on whether it should continue.
no1curr
01-07-2017 , 09:30 PM
My main observation for you all is that there are a lot of racist gays and this has nothing to do with conservative or liberal.
01-07-2017 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
I'm so ahead of you guys. I'm an LGBTQIACDEFHJKMNOPRSUVWXYZ supporter. I've got the rainbow of minority activism covered! Nothing more to do! My moral goodness is complete. I've reached the oneness with morality that Buddhists strive for. I love all things.

Over/under on LGBT having at least 8 letters within 10 years?
You must have peeked. That's cheating. It already has 8 letters . . . LGBTIQAP

"LGBTIQAP stands for Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersexual Queer Asexual "Pansexual" & "Polysexual". "P" here stands both for Pansexual & Polysexual whereas "Q" may stand both for "Queer" and "Questioning". This is a competitive term to LGBT, LGBTI, LGBTIQ or LGBTIA. It covers all the people of gender and sexual minorities. People whose sex is neither male nor female, whose gender is neither male nor female and whose sexual orientation is not heterosexual includes here."
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=LGBTIQAP
01-07-2017 , 09:33 PM
It has however many letters I say it has .
01-07-2017 , 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Anorexics have a far worse time with their dismorphia than trans people do. Both socially, legally, and in dealing with doctors and others. You don't care about their plight, because SEX SEX SEX orientation is what's important to you. Not subjective experience.
What legal issues are anorexics facing?

How do they tie in with LGBTQ issues?
01-07-2017 , 09:41 PM
Tooth saucers posts aren't worth the time it takes to respond to them because he's a committed member of the alt right.
01-07-2017 , 09:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
My point, beneath the absurdist humor, is that as liberals, what gets our empathy and attention should be a lot broader than LGTBI. If our goal is to reduce subjective unfair suffering, rather than shove it in the face of those horrible righties whose existence we don't like, LGB doesn't rate in the top 20 most important issues in this world. TI doesn't rate in the top 200, and in fact there's a strong case we're doing net harm there by encouraging body dismorphia that leads to deeply unhappy outcomes rather than treatment.The range of what receives actioned empathy is cringingly narrow right now for most SJWs. And completely misdirected.
Why are you so sure that the people who're defending all those other minority groups wouldn't come to the defense of anorexics?

I'm guessing most who actively advocate for the LGBBQ issues do it because they fit in that spectrum themselves and it impacts their life.

You must find it infuriating when people donate money to medical research of conditions that aren't in the top 10.
01-07-2017 , 10:00 PM
01-07-2017 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
Lol. Remember when Wil linked to Breitbart and then, out of embarrassment, denied that he'd ever read Breitbart, and then later on started defending Breitbart?
It's a magical time to be alive.

Who woulda thunk the end of the world would be so benign?

      
m