I, for example, think that the Westboro baptist church have the right to spout their nonsense but if they asked to come into my house to talk to me, I wouldn't let them in.

CPAC isn't obligated to give anyone a platform. Free speech is about government intervention.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Repeat : you have no idea what you are talking about. Do not talk like this in front of others in public, you will sound like a complete and total moron. I'm telling you, go TALK to gay men. You don't have to believe me, in fact, I don't want you to believe me. Go make some gay friends, and then actually have a conversation with them. You'll be very very surprised when you find out I'm right, and you're wrong. You are making yourself out to sound like a complete fool, speaking out a topic that you obviously have NO familiarity with.

This is like the time Bill Haywood was trying to tell me what Koreans think. It must be a failing of you self-hating White liberals. You all think you have the green light to tell what other people like or dislike. It's bizarre. Sorry dude, you don't get to speak for me.

I don't need to lie. I didn't make the story up. I actually go out in the world and, unlike you, talk to people. I show genuine interest in their lives. They appreciate it and I have long-lasting, deep friendships. I am not you, I don't have to lie. You, however, show many signs of being an outright liar, or at least misleading. I do not believe you have gay male friends, and I sure as hell don't believe you know anything about their community. Sorry, but your deception is obvious to me.

Again, you have NO idea what you are talking about. Please, stop making yourself look dumber than you are. The way you are trying to come up with your justification that "1000" sexual partners is impossible is really, really dumb. Do not believe me, go ask someone.

Also Wil, you propped up that radical christian post for like 6 hours before disavowing it. Now, you "Don't use data?" These views aren't congruent. You used that study because of two reasons:
It was the first hit when you google "gay men sexual partners" and it backs up your personal anecdote about your "two friends." Now, if you don't believe that data anymore...do you not believe your two friends? It's obvious you still believe your friends and the data you posted. Just own it, you own every other terrible view.

Wil, you both disavowed the study because it was on a radical christian site, but now in the post above...you double down on it's findings! How do you not see this as contradictory? How can you be so dumb to disavow data, then go on the anecdotes of TWO FRIENDS WHO AREN'T EVEN REAL.

Like, 50 different sexual partners for 20 years on average for nearly 10% of the population is insane. The math needed to make this possible, is insane.

Here is a press release to a 2015 study of 33,000 Americans on their sexual history:
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea...-caa050415.php

Note: Only one person was said to have had sex with 1,000 partners. The average for baby boomers was 11. Millenials was 8. Now, if nearly 30% of the LGBT population was having 1000 partners...that would skew the numbers a bit!

Why would I be upset? It's their right to rescind his invitation, if they wish.

Likewise with the book.

More dishonesty from you.

Even more dishonesty from you. Please quote.

Did I call it a poll? I misspoke. Still misleading from you.

I'm not saying it was manipulated. I'm saying the data isn't a scientific poll and it isn't supported or corroborated by other means. If you'd have cited the racial preference data from sites like OKCUPID and other dating apps, I'd have accepted it as true because it is supported by multiple other sites which hold the same type of data.

OKCUPID, by itself, isn't a good data source. Why I have to explain this to you and why the numbers may be misrepresentative of that specific group shouldn't need to be explained. It is, almost positively, flawed data. If you pulled up data from multiple gay dating sites all supporting a claim, I'd agree with you. You don't have it because it's not available to us publicly. You don't do it because you can't.

To be completely honest I wish my two (ex) friends were online posters, as I'd invite them here to give their views. It was actually three friends (Sorry AB, I forgot about you!). We had long discussions about it, and their lifestyles. I found it fascinating and I enjoyed them, as it gave me a real window into a group of people I've never had exposure to before.

I am not making anything up, unlike you. You are the person who is obviously lying, not me. I don't make it a habit of lying, which is why I seem to run into so many problems on 2+2. If I was a lying, weasly bitch like you, I'd never get into trouble.


Stop bringing this up. I told you multiple times why I posted the link, it was to show something outrageous to laugh at your OKCUPID data.

It is no where insane when you think about the possibilities of group sex. This is why I know you are lying. Before I talked and got to know my friends my reaction was exactly like yours. Trust me, I had to have multiple conversations and have it explicitly explained. We'd go out for beers and we'd talk about it because I was very interested in it.

You. Do. Not. Know. What. You. Are. Talking. About.

Please, just stop it and stop lying to people. You are ignorant on this subject.

TIMEOUT!

He was very clear that the arbitrary cap when he was 14 was 50yo women.

I think you owe 8th grade hypothetical Wil an apology.

Wil, please explain why "Ok Cupid is not a good data source." Please. Use facts and data, things about as foreign to you as the french language.

It is accepted by, and in line with other studies. I have now posted six studies in this thread. You have posted zero, if you're disavowing the website that thinks Noah's Arc literally happened. You have said "it's hard to gather information on this." This is not true. If you have ever taken an intro pysch course, literally the most researched topics are sex related. You get credits for taking these surveys/quizzes. Virtually every college kid ends up doing these.

Again, to think that a decent part of the population is averaging ~100 partners and a large subset of that population is having ~1000+, while on average, the general population averages ~10 partners is so insane.

I'd have done 60 year olds. Maybe 70, depending on the boob situation. I was a horny teenage male. Weren't most of us?

Nope you are the one mistaken.

Uh, he just doubled and tripled down on it this page. Are you blind? His recent comments are even worse than what Red paraphrased him as!

You were clearly very popular with teenage girls.

"These 3mm people can't be trusted but I have these two friends"

LOL how quickly the worm turns once it's a right wing organization doing the disinvitation

It is apparent to me that you bringing this up over and over again is because I've called you out as a complete and total liar, and you know I'm correct and trying your best to save face.

You, my friend, are a liar. It is blatantly obvious to everyone here that you are wildly flailing about and trying desperately to justify your claims with bad data.

I'm currently searching through gay websites and reading forums on the topic. I am pleasantly surprised to find out that I am, as usual, correct. You are welcome to do the same. I will not provide links but you can do your Google searches and start sifting through the forums and people's actual own words and stories. Go do it, come back here and then apologize.

There is no need to continue talking about how wrong you are. You are wrong on this topic as you are wrong about almost everything.

You are a great poster !!!! The perfect foil for wil.

Do your freewheeling friends ever get it on together. Almost seems like guys would have to duck out anytime they meet another gay guy and have sex to keep up these numbers.

wil is going to end up blowing 1,000 guys to win this argument

No.

I wasn't. I had some good experiences but I'd have rather had more. I didn't hit my stride until I turned 19 or so and learned about social interaction. Things got wildly better for me, and my 20s were great. I'm happy how it all turned out. Thanks for your concern.

What is funny is that you make assumptions about every single thing about my life. You know nothing about me, I don't see why this mind-reading trick is so prevalent from you liberal jagoffs.

When I was a teenager 30 was about as old as I could go without being creeped out.

This is what you get when you ask Wil for facts and data. Let us remember, that Wil is a coward, who will not post data during arguments, but will post pictures of his children holding signs insulting posters. This is because Wil is a small man, both in terms of height and moral courage. Wil is a coward, and always will be.

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea...-caa050415.php
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?t...2%5BJournal%5D
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...nd-more-urban/
http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PU...al-ch6-sex.pdf
http://www.natsal.ac.uk/home.aspx
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/37853719/n...ex-statistics/
https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j...aFKjbres-bDOKw
http://www.businessinsider.com/avera...artners-2015-4
http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/are-we-blushing-yet/

These are the surveys and studies I've read in the past day, in addition to the six I've posted up thread Wil. Now, none support your view. Mind posting one?

I was not anticipating this response.

Well, maybe you deplorables might wanna get on the same page here.

Anyways, riddle me this... since M.Yiannopoulos hasn't been subject to governmental censorship, WTF has this 1000s post thread been about all this time?

I'm actually annoyed that I have to delete my browsing history so that my wife doesn't think I turned gay on her.