This is insane and harmful to the LGBT community. Not every LGBT person is DTF every other person of their attracted sex! Just like not every straight man would **** every straight woman, that is not how LGBT people work.

Indeed. heehaww (and everyone else) please cut out the stereotyping of the LGBTQ community.

Don't expect any more warnings

I'm honest about my perspective. Milo says a LOT of distasteful and shocking things to get a reaction. That's not my thing, but whatever, it's his life. I'm simply relating to his experience. Milo is a gay man, I am a straight man, yet we are both men, and I can relate to many of his arguments. I don't lie about it.

You've gotten dumber in your old age. You should work on that, your virtue-signalling is loltastic. You would think as you get older you'd become more mature and care less what others think about you. You are regressing.

You have been wrong pretty much about every single thing we've ever discussed.

I'm a few years older than you, and I make a whole ****load more money than you. Don't forget that, dog.

There are no differences between men and women. We are all the same. Keep repeating it.

Why do I have to explain TRIVIALLY easy things to you? Look at my actual response :

Do you notice the highlighted sentence? Why do you think I said "How about I respond with this"? I was posting the data as a counter to how ridiculous his data source was. I wasn't doing it to submit it as truth, I was posting a non-credible source to MAKE A POINT.

OKCUPID isn't a valid data source on this topic, you ****ing idiot.

Notice the most important part of this statement, the one where he gets to speak for an entire group of people because he knows whats best.

This, my friends, is how absurd everything has become.

Chez, do I get to speak for all 80 million Koreans on the planet? Or only the 2 million Korean Americans? Or only the 1 million Korean American males? Or only the 900k Korean American straight males?

Saying "not every person is dtf " is absurd to wil.
The sky is blue
The earth is round
What other obvious things do you find absurd?

Wil, you doubled down on the radical Christian data about 4 times before I posted that site was a radical Christian site that it was a radical Christian site. Only when I mocked you for posting stats from it did you back down. The only reason you posted it was because it was the first Google hit for "gay men lifetime partners" or whatever similar Google search you did.

If you want to attack the validity of the OK cupid study, attack the data, not the source of the data. That's how you do it in academia. You will not be able to do this though, because you don't understand statistics.

I also posted three separate surveys that got data pretty much the same as the okcupid study, but you're going to ignore that as well I imagine. The only reason your reply you just reposted said the okcupid study "wasn't corroborated by other data" was because you Googled "lifetime gay partners" or whatever, used the first site which was your radical Christian site and opposed the study based on that. Your backpedaling is funding pathetic.

Easy there, fella, I didn't say every gay man is DTF. And before you snap my head off again, it might help you to know that I'm bi and married to a man.

I'm actually shocked that anything I said was controversial. Males, whether gay or straight, human or ~any species, tend to be promiscuous, isn't that common knowledge? If gay & bi men as a group have more sex than straight men (which I think we do, but obv not anywhere near the rabbit-like frequency Wil imagines), it's not because we're more promiscuous, but because sex is more easily available to us. If you think any of this is debatable, I'm all ears. Let's have a calm discussion, trust me I'm not Wil lol.

Well, this is a much different statement from your first one. It could totally be possible to have a discussion around what you're saying, but we can't start from the premise that every gay guy is DTF every other one and we can all get laid in 15 minutes on Grindr. Gay men live very different lifestyles in this country--a gay man in rural Georgia or even Atlanta might end up leading a very different lifestyle than a gay man in San Francisco. And some people of all sexual stripes are promiscuous, including straight men and women. I don't think it's helpful to lump all LGBT people into the same bucket on this issue. The truth is many LGBT people are reserved with their sexuality, many of them will only have a handful of sexual partners in their whole lives just like many straight people.

Wait, you realize this is your *entire* identity here, only you say the equally distasteful things due to ignorance and stupidity, not shock value? The only difference between you and milo is smart enough to make a ton of money off of the dumb stuff he says for shock value, you say the same things on an online message board for free because you're deplorable.

I've never made any such claim about anything. How could any logical person say something like "every person wants X"? It's ridiculous, and a point I made multiple times in this thread.

Idiocy is absurd. Most things you say are absurd because you are an idiot who lacks basic logic.

Please quote exactly where I doubled down on data that I actually told you beforehand was ridiculous? I KNEW what source it came from to use it as a counter-point. Where did I "double-down" on it? QUOTE MY ****ING STATEMENT.

As I've said, I was on my phone when we were arguing the point. Looking through any data I could find quickly made me realize there was a political agenda at work. Data for a source like this are notoriously hard to find. We all know why, and I made an argument for exactly why. You then attacked one of my three sources for my argument and walked away from any defending of your idiocy, as usual.

Your arguments are dishonest and flat out wrong. You are welcome to your opinions but I'm telling you that you look like an idiot. Trust me, do not go out in public and speak the way you do here - you will be laughed at.

The data isn't that credible. It is from one demographic on one particular site. It is exactly why I linked what I linked earlier - to make the point that data can be manipulated and presented in a way to push a certain point of view. This concept seems to be above your head, you moron.

I don't remember seeing it. Give me the post # and I'll look at it, but I'm sure it'll be laughable.

Uhhh Wil. You say the data isn't credible because it's just one site and one demographic? Why did you just give away that you never even read my posts about the okcupid study? They didn't just study the LGBT population. They obviously don't have over 3 million LGBT members. They studied their entire user base. This is why their study had over 3 million people in it. Literally everybody who had an account was included. So, it's not that you have no idea about basic statistics to refute a study, it's that you can't read at a 5th grade level sometimes.

Shame Wil, you ALMOST did the 10 seconds of required reading this time to not look like a moron!

Wil, saying "any person wants x" is very logical sometimes. Within the psychological community you see such claims over and over. What did you go to school for again? Something IT related?

Will, you used the radical Christian study to support that you have gay friends who apparently have over 1000 partners. You used that data point to back up your personal anecdotes and repeatedly asserted such was common in the gay community. Stop gaslighting, please.

Also I would have to offer you a smooth "bisexual high-five" (that's not a sexual act guys) as we are both clearly members of the *best* sexuality.

LOL @ deplorable, cuz. You don't know anything about me. If anything I'm much more tolerant than the majority of you morons. I care almost nothing what other people do. You live your life however you wish, I will mine. The only thing that I care about is how your decisions affect mine. If they do not intersect, you can keep ****ing that chicken for all I care.

LOL @ "smart enough to make a ton of money". Milo is a celebrity. I'm a dude who wastes time arguing with idiots on 2+2. Even your assessment of something as simple as this is laughable.

Are you good at anything in life?

Wil, you're an adult who frequently posts racist, sexist, homophobic rhetoric online then attacks people who disagree with you. You bring your children into online arguments when you get riled up by frequently being shown to be wrong. You don't have the mental capacity to study sources, and since we have been on this topic have posted sources from a radical Christian site, a dating blog owned by a 23 year old and the huffpo blog section. I have refuted with 3 academic studies and the okcupid one because it has over 3.2 million data points. Now, perhaps you could start researching things again
Go past the first hit on Google this time. Don't have the cognitive bias of only repost things that agree with your world view despite the sources being very poor. You know, learn something.

Right - so when you were 14, Mayo was like 3. That's what I was getting at. Gross.

Did we ever determine how much wil made from the debacle with [forgetting poster name]?

LetsGambool where wil lost the I earn more than you bet anyway cos he's a ****ing idiot and then tried to angle the **** out of it. 1k I think

This is correct and it's been correct each and every time a similar point has been made regarding wil's posts, he's a dickhead of the highest order but hasn't changed at all since. Now you know this and who the **** am I to tell people how to post on the internet but just be sure replying to the ****ing idiot serves some purpose other than convincing him of an argument because it's never doing that.

Good times. Seems like he definitely learned his lesson.

That's a feature not a bug, and until Trump emboldened you all it was working great! I don't want your hot takes to be inserted back into what's considered acceptable to be shared publicly.

Can't be expected to rewire the ****ed up head of anyone not coming to me for help, but I sure as **** can promote an environment where the ****ed up views in ****ed up heads are only expressed behind closed doors.

LetsGambool also told wil that he knew what wil earned because wil was dumb enough to brag about it before getting into the bet. Wil clearly decided he was being levelled anyway by accepting the bet despite LG telling him he knew how much he earned

Wil, you can't back pedal away from the radical Christian site. Why? Because you agreed with it! You posted it because you said you had two friends who had told you personally, that they have had over 1000 different sexual partners in their life. Now, this didn't happen but let's keep acting like it did. You then used these "two friends" to talk down on anyone who disagreed with you. Since the top Google hit agreed with you and your "two friends" you proceeded to talk down to everyone in this thread about how many gay people they know. Only when I started posting the radical Christian site's views on Noah's arc, abortion and evolution did you finally start to back pedal away from their findings.

You didn't do it because it would be insane for a gay man from anywhere in the south or anywhere rural to have over 1000 different partners. No, this simple math couldn't get through to our dear friend who somehow is a parent William.

Wil could easily actually research this topic. I was able to read some excerpts from the 1978 research (not all junk, decent for its time), four studies and other academia stuff on this subject since we've had this discussion
Wil obviously has done none of this and becoming informed does not interest him.

So, where have our "free speech" absolutists gone?

Who's going to explain to us how M.Yiannopoulos has been "censored" by "deplatforming"? And how this led to MAGAism. How about praise for college pederast clubs inviting pedophilia apologists to speak in the name of "academic freedom"? And condemnation for all those who peacefully object. After all, we wouldn't want colleges to "coddle" the "american mind".