Honestly, what does it matter how many letters they have? How is that hurting you personally?

That's my point Peter. Why limit it to LGBTI? It used to be LGB rights. Thankfully, we've left this hateful, ignorant, exclusionary part of our past behind, and it's LGBTI rights. Why stop there? Who are we being hateful to and excluding? Probably the whole alphabet, if you think about it.

So let's talk about LGBTQIACDEFHJKMNOPRSUVWXYZ rights, and be done with it. Let's include all people and orientations, equally. Have a twitter hashtag for all. You'll be promoting equality. Why wait years or even decades to add more and more letters?

Also wil literally wanted to fight me.
P.S. wil you can't even handle mild disagreement on the internet without flipping out, I don't think anyone needs to meet you to know what's up. Don't let that string of victories from beating your kid and mushing female strangers on the subway fool you into thinking you're Jason ****ing Bourne.

Those in opposition are supporting hate!

LGBTQIACDEFHJKMNOPRSUVWXYZ, now!

Beating up Internet trolls isn't something that interests me. I have a mental picture of you and I'd be curious to see if I was correct.

Start a movement, dude.

Totally respectful.

Opposition to what? What point do you and TS imagine you're making here?

The actual issue, which is pretty obvious, is small-minded social conservatives get incredibly upset about modern society's drift towards being more diverse, secular, and tolerant.

You've got that generalized anxiety and frustration that things are more differenter than they was... but we don't. We don't share those cultural touchstones of being FURIOUS that gay people exist.

No, not at all. I've disagreed with many many people, and I don't think they have metal health issues. Have I ever questioned your mental health? Intelligence is another story.

You're an idiot if you believe this. Lol at conservatives being furious about gays. Who gives a crap. The issue is done, they won, and everyone is OK with it.

Christ, Trump held up the gay flag.

So close Wil, but that doesn't explain why what 57 said was disgusting.

Theatre of the absurd.

kioshk is this something you support?

Totally respectful...

Are you saying you support the hateful side of not including the rsuvw and X's?

What is absurd? Like, do you just enjoy disagreeing with me for the sake of it? You asked me a question and I answered it directly and honestly. Then you make up some stupid ass statement like this?

Can you speak and understand English? Do you know how to communicate like a normal person?

Again - have I ever actually said to you that you have a mental health issue? Also, have you ever seen me say that constantly about other people?

The answer is no and no, you goofy bastard. You can make things up in your own head if you wish, but you doing this weird version of internet mumbling is bizarre and childish.

I'm saying you and TS mocking the LBGT communities choice of names is just another indication of your bigotry and hate. You are both basically horrible people who 2+2 would be better off without.

To be honest, I think the same of you. You are a dirty, lying, scumbag.

BTW - interpreting what we are saying as "mocking" the LGBT community is hilarious. You are way, way dumber than you seem to be. Your knuckles must drag on the ground when you walk.

On what planet is the bolded true? First of all, the "issue" isn't just limited to SSM. Second, you have a significant percentage of the Republican Party trying to come up with a way to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, or at least trying to pass state laws to limit it. And as I mentioned, we've got senators proposing stuff like the FADA, which pretty much allows for anyone religious to discriminate anytime they want and get away with it by hiding behind God or some book.

There are a few things that have to be tidied up, I agree, but the general fight is over. They are mostly accepted by people and protected by law.

"Mostly" is mathematically accurate because SSM has 61% national support and probably 80% of people overall have no problem with anyone LGBTQ, but there's still a sharp regional divide and will be for quite some time, until all the olds die off. You're certainly not accepted in Alabama in the same sense you are in Bushwick.

Yes, it was. But it was also pointing that it's implicitly ignoring a vast number of vulnerable groups, from Anorexics to Zulus. Why do we not talk about their rights instead? Why are we campaigning for the dismorphias of transgenders to be accepted as normal, while few are complaining about the kidnapping, imprisonment and torture of the dismorphia from anorexia? Is it any crazier having your penis sliced off because you "feel" you're a woman, than it is to not eat 2000 calories a day because you "feel" you're fat?

Anorexics to Zulus, I say. Screw your exclusionary worldview, kerowo, and your ignorance of letters not on your list. You probably would have denied the trans people inclusion on that list, because the LGBs are what mattered before there was a T and an I.
The point is that the choice of people to help, to focus on, is arbitrary. Gays have a rogeringly good time these days. If a gay guy called Milo who often talks about how he sucks black dicks, can rise to prominence on the backs of people you call white supremacists (this is your claim!) - typically associated with gay-hate as much as black-hate - then the gay thing is over. They won! You've proven it yourself.

Now is the time to move on to other people who need our help.

Of course. We all know this and realize it'll take time, but again, it's mostly over.

**** your sanctimonious bull**** right in the ear. Anorexics aren't being chained to fences and stoned to death or drug by truck bumpers. You've admitted you're bigoted against LGBT, you've been warned about it, so you can just shut the **** up about LGBT people from now on.

I just quoted you asking 2outs if he really thinks that people who disagree with him are nuts, (and complaining about the "mental health line of attack"), and in another post (made on the same day) calling Fly nuts. It struck me as absurd.

I guess not? 1 point for wil.