Yes, of course I take information from the choices people make about their appearance, their clothes their hairstyle their cleanliness, and yes, a tattoo on their face all result in different "judgements". And then I continue to take in more information, visibly and audibly about the person to narrow down who that person is and what kind of person they are. Sometimes, further information isn't required- if someone has racist or gang-related tattoo(s) on their neck / face (or anywhere on the body really) , I dont need anymore information. Generally speaking, tattoos on the neck, and definitely on the face, indicate a person is a severe moran.
There are few exceptions, and while i'm sad that sometimes a few good will get mixed in with the bad, i'm willing to make that sacrifice when "discriminating" who gets to be around me and my family / friends.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilverine
Discriminate is used trickily here. Do I see/treat someone different based on giant tattoos? Sure.
I agree. But here's the thing, people who body-modify to an extreme degree (or what I would consider to be an extreme degree, anyway) want to be seen and treated differently. That is their goal: Look at me! I'm a special snowflake! I'm ... "art" !