As far as I'm concerned he lied about my actions in the mod forum. And seeing as that's the only thing I actually really engaged in with him recently, that's not looking good for Spanks.

So that makes dids post not s lie. And his post about spanks 'acting' like he doesn't know the definition of dishonesty doesn't seem like a lie either. At best it's like what you said above - wrong.

So after being 0/2 I'm not super convinced.

He also:

-Closed a thread, spent a lot of posts defending his decision, reopened it after getting enough **** for being wrong, then later claimed the entire thing was a joke
-Threatened to ban someone over nothing, then also claimed that was a joke when told it would be an abuse of mod powers
-Has talked out of his ass about subjects only to turn around and claim to be an expert

Nobody following his posts from the beginning would believe that he hasn't been lying.

I lied about you behaving like a dick? That is my honest assessment of your behavior. I was asking for mod advice and you made some dick comment about disliking my posts which had nothing to do with the mod advice I was seeking.

I say you were dick for posting like that in the mod forum and are a lying dick now about it.

Just like Dids, lying about lying. Pee-pee heads in pod. Being dishonest about a person's honesty is a pretty bad sort of dishonesty. Tssk tssk. At least Dids' dishonesty is more the veiled suspicious sort.

You know- I out argued you once in the public breast feeding thread and you disappeared for months. Lol.

Being offended by something is still essentially your situation to deal in that kind of situation. I stand by my position then as I do now.

Reminds of the time I lambasted Dids for fear-mongering about The South. It's okay Dids. I won't judge you for running. Obviously, I go another way.

Joining club mischaracterization and suspicion smokey? All the cool kids are doing it I hear.

Tell me more how I wasn't intentionally acting like a bad mod in response to the dumb criticism I was a bad mod. I admitted it often enough and even ended up apologizing. Honesty.

When did I claim expertise in anything? What stops me from having a diverse amount of knowledge related to complex systems and schools of thinking like politics and philosophy? I like to share information, experience and knowledge more than I like to clown around. Honesty.

Your own lack of information is the same failing of Dids terrible position. You followed right off that cliff. Never too late to climb back up...

Y'all sure are swimming the rates right out of this potato.

It looks like the Fail Full Four has been effectively set. It's funny as Deuces McKracken (#1 seed) and DudeImBetter (#3 seed) have been actively campaigning, variously for and against their candidacy, while ikestoys (#2 seed) has remained aloof. However the story of the tournament has gotta be spanktehbadwookie (#13 seed) who seems to be using a strategy of aggressively flooding the forum with jibber-jabber... in an apparent attempt to actually become the baddest poster.

Right now I gotta think this #13 seed is the favorite, perhaps even odds-on, to win the (thread) title !!!1!

Lol. Shamer jabber jibber trolly said jibber jabber.

I would have assumed thie finals would be sputnik3000 vs dude im bettqer but i guess you guys arent counting sputnik as a person whihc makes sense.

Someone is drunk

sputty going the silverman route and calling the SPLC a feminist rag.

Pretty sure silverman was banned around the time he started saying the same thing (only with racist overtones, not sexist overtones).

Sure wish spank was still a mod.

Remember, voting ends Wed.

Recency bias itt

I beg everyone involved to stop the Spanking. It's a big turn off.

Just say the safe word.

the safe word is "lampoon"

I know it's too late now, but I really wish the rules of the contest stipulated that all Fail Four Finalists were quarantined to their own containment thread for the year, while the overall winner was exiled for a year.

We want this to be a MANDATE! (And a warning to others.)

Mods are apparently little bitches and won't make this happen.

I encourage everyone to just ignore these idiots starting now.

The Unchained concept isn't complex. It's not the forum for you to say whatever you want but have everyone else be held to some arbitrary standard that you have.

To be fair, holding a bad posters election isn't really "some arbitrary standard that you have".

Of course it is. Every person is voting based off what they think makes a person bad.

If you want a forum modded by majority rules - that should be "Politics". And if "Politics" isn't being modded based on how the majority wants it - that should be addressed there.

I was talking about the chained moderators.

That's like, just your arbitrary standard for what Politics Unchained is all about. There's nothing inherent to the forum that stipulates that somebody can't get exiled through an election. You literally wrote the forum rules. Can't get much more arbitrary than that, you must admit.

That was the 'founding premise' of Unchained if you will. But if you want to think of it as me making an arbitrary rule - I'm fine with that.

What's the matter? Are you afraid that the collective judgement of a bunch of low life sock puppets isn't enough of a warning lol.

If I win I will stop posting in the bad posters thread for a time, maybe until the thread title no longer bears my handle. All you great posters can bitch and complain about me, make up bull**** about me with no basis in reality, and I won't be in there to give it back and point out how dip**** you are.