Spank now trying to justify his god awful posting as an act of parody (I re-read that sunscreen thread this morning, and yeah- there's no attempt at parody there, just a guy who think he can write goofy and is wrong) after the fact is pretty perfect. You're just not a very honest guy are you?

@Shame Trolly

In my case I have lobbied hard for any kind of explanation/discussion justifying several people calling me an antisemite. I would love to have a debate on that. I am not trying to push the accusations aside out of fear. I am trying to get them up for examination. Wookie offered one post in which he claimed I was using antisemitic tropes in my 911 arguments. That is utter nonsense and I spelled that out to him, logically. Accusing specific people (only some of whom happen to be Jewish) with specific crimes citing specific evidence is not using tropes- in fact it's completely, 180 degrees, antithetical to using tropes. He simply doesn't respond and carries on with the slander.

To be honest, I also label people racist (though I am much more likely to say that their idea, not they themselves, are racist) based on less than their own confession or their production of explicitly supremacist doctrine. The difference between me and the asshat committee here who are making complete BS claims against me is that I can actually make a case for my inference and am more than willing to do so.

Hell, even Gamblor (Gamblor ffs) who has all the integrity of a telemarketer selling used racism, had to come to my aid and halt the ridiculousness of the antisemitism slurs. When you offend gamblor with your misplaced accusations of Jew hating (which he thinks is responsible for just about every injustice under the Sun), that should be a clear warning that you are way, way off base.

Think we all need to be nice to L.K from now on.

Sputnik, maybe if you beg him enough dib will give you a hand job. You could finally feel what it's like to have someone else touch your wang.

Cant you just be quiet and let me pity you for atleast 24h. After that we can go back to me making fun of you.

This is exactly the way those whining about being called racist should handle it.

Instead, the usual suspects avoid all debate, and intentionally derail the conversation, by the tactic of whining about 'name calling'. I'll repeat: In Alta-Politards, it should be a snap-temp-ban for whining about 'name calling' regarding racism.

You spelled envy wrong.

Dids uses frequent dishonest dishonesty attacks. It is nicely paradoxical.

See the pity as a gift and a caring gesture.

It's cute how sputnik is so obsessed with me that he loses the ability to communicate and has to resort to gifs. Maybe some day a girl will touch his weewee

Show your work. 'Cause I don't lie and I take that pretty seriously.

24h of pity and then we can discuss my weewee.

All of your posts are really about your weewee, sput

Who is this ultimately not true of tho

:raises hand:

Lol. You've told so many lies that it is better to let them sit in the forum to rot.

Your biggest lie is that I am dishonest. You calling anyone dishonest but yourself is a fabulous joke.

You act hostile when called out accurately for being wrong. I have had no problem calling you out by various methods. I don't even need a bunch of red knight surrogates like you enjoy.

I told you a long time ago and several times further that unchained may be too difficult for you. It is still a solid read.

Someone is butthurt they can't mod PU lol

red knights?

I do not think ( maybe naively) anyone here is pure evil, so black knights are out. Red knight works for situation better than white knight. We could go with Red Mage for the FF theme.

Show us the PU alignments.

See... this exchange was handled perfectly by Dids.

1) Dids gives a particular example where he *feels* spanktehbadwookie is begin dishonest. 2) Instead of engaging Dids in that conversation, spanktehbadwookie 'name calls' Dids dishonest by not giving any examples. 3) Instead of mindless butthurt whining about being 'name called', Dids asks spanktehbadwookie to "show his work". 4) spanktehbadwookie refuses to show any work, double downs on his 'name calling', and starts jibber-jabbering.

End result: spanktehbadwookie can't or won't explain how he isn't being dishonest in the given example, and is blatantly 'name calling' Dids by refusing to 'show his work'.

So you've got nothing then spank? Good to know (I knew that already).

I think you lied when you said you talked to a speech therapist about your posting.

I think you lied when you said you're an expert on racism from your work in loss prevention. (and when you made a variety of similar claims).

I think you lied when you claimed your nonsense in the sunscreen thread was deliberate trolling.

Maybe I'm wrong, and I am, that makes me wrong, that doesn't make me a liar. It's the same gambit you tried with my complaints about your modding. Rather than address them head on, you tried to call me dishonest and make me look like the bad guy because you didn't like what you were hearing.

It is dishonest to suspiciously question any of that stuff. I can spot a dishonest accusation based on uninformed personal speculation a mile away.

Being wrong and being dishonest go hand in hand.

So any poster can search Dids posts with 'spank' as a keyword and see a running volume of dishonestly wrong. There is simply too much to cite and not worth anyone's further time.

Alls Dids can do is prove it by continuing to post in reference to spank posts in the same manner as Dids has historically; or not. It boils down to a choice. The easiest choice is to stop.

You jumped the gun. Look out for the ricochet!