Go create a thread and talk all you wish. You think I actually DESIRE to have a conversation with YOU? Bitch, please.

Let me know which thread it is and I'll agree to not post in it (I won't even read the mfer) and if I do by accident they can be deleted. Trust me, I wish you'd put me on ignore and never interact with me ever again. Please, do me that favor, make both our lives a little bit better.

aoFrantic,

Ok I read it and I'm pretty sure you could win your lying liars bet based on that 1 post alone.

keep telling yourself whatever you need to sleep at night lol

2 chimpanzees are sitting in a tree and the 1st chimpanzee says, "Good bananas today."

The 2nd chimpanzee replies, "Holy ****ing **** a talking chimpanzee!"

Wil, when we say a hate crime is "fake" we mean that there actually wasn't a crime. This includes people generally making up stories. This does happen! But, its very, very rare. This isn't what the site was, at all. I really would like if you spent even 30 seconds reading the sites you used as citations, so you knew whether they were racist or not.

The site you linked generally just shows the "hey minorities do it too" argument behind hate crimes. It's similar to the "black crime" section of breitbart. At the very least, it's racist and misleading to rile up a base of racist people.

Also, you're claiming chezlaw didn't edit out your post linking to a radical Christian site because it was an abhorrent site with radical views on everything? That's gaslighting

Also that's another total goddamn lie out of the lying liar's mouth as he started crowing about getting me banned for being The Real Racist Part 2: The Racistening well after being ignored.

Hahaha. Lololololol.

You are calling the site racist because you don't AGREE with their classifications?

Is that your argument?

Ikes agreed to a ban because he lost a bet about Trump, not over his forum behaviour.

It's asking too much of people to ignore abhorrent posts on emotive subjects, such as a parent who openly advocates punching children in the face as good parenting, or someone who sticks up for Milo's views on sex between 30 year olds and 13 year olds.

Aofrantic, you must be a walking freak show in real life. Do you wear blue lipstick?

Ok I'm on the goddamned edge of my seat up in here.

Above is a perfectly reasonable and calm and diplomatic post.

I wonder what wil's reply will be!

Son, I say, son, these good times are killing me.

Please quote both instances and we can discuss. Thanks.

ok. start a thread in atf. if there is so much talk about will he feels like replying, a second thread can be opened where he can participate.

It's all fun and games until wil pokes somebody's eye out.

I was replying to Mat, not to you.

It's good that you recognised these descriptions of your own positions, though.

I haven't posted in ATF for a long time. Don't worry, I won't be posting in it.

Please, feel free to quote. People can make come to their own conclusions. I stand by every word.

That's not a fake hate crime! That's a dude giving a bs excuse for his wife being murdered, because he is guilty!

Again, not a "Fake hate crime." It's two minorities perpetuating one!

Again, how is this a "Fake hate crime?" Dude got arrested for bomb threats!
The link they use (after claiming "the media blamed trump") does not mention any political motivations at all. He has been ordered to take a psychiatric exam and it will likely just show that he's troubled, not that it was politically motivated anti trump as per your site.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montre...eats-1.4006151

Again, not a fake hate crime! Just a dumb kid!

This is a "Fake hate crime" because there were only hundreds of tweets celebrating the assassination of a politician, rather than thousands as first incorrectly reported!
This of course doesn't even stand up to the smallest bit of scrutiny of what "fake" means.

I could do this all night. Sometimes people fake crimes for attention, because they're mentally ill, to cover something up or for other reasons. But the vast majority of instances on that website are either poorly sourced from alt right blogs with like a 21 person monthly viewership or actual crimes committed by minorities.

We've seen Wil post absolutely no content in this thread while throwing out insult after insult. This isn't a !!! thread either, but that will not matter. Wil is protected because he is the class clown.

Before I go to bed I just wanted to touch on this again. I read this post multiple times and I have to say I'm completely horrified at what I'm reading here. Your line of thought is so hopelessly broken that I am actually worried about you as a person. For someone to actually think this way is downright scary.

One of us is awfully, terribly wrong. I'm very well aware that it's possible I am the one who is wrong, but I don't think so. I don't see how two people, namely you and me, could think so differently and it be possible for both of us to live happy, healthy lives.

I truly feel bad for anyone who could have their mind warped in the way yours is. We are truly in trouble if that's how you really think. I wouldn't believe it if I didn't see it myself. I'm utterly shocked. You're in for a lot of disappointment in life, kid. Start saving money for therapy now. You're going to ****ing need it.

p.s.


Don't worry, I know. You're the genuine article imo, an actual curious dude interested in things.

As far as different facets of posters goes, there were/are a bunch of people in BFI who had no idea Toothsayer is the resident Bananapants White Supremacist. Dudes were like, "Huh, he gave me a stock tip here and there, I had no was also a phrenology enthusiast!"

Etc and etc.

Not sure if serious dot jaypeg

i'm serious. it sounds like an interesting conversation. it might turn out not to be, but it has potential.

You are as dishonest as a poster I've ever seen, evidenced by me offering you a thousand bucks I could prove you lying and you declined.

I won't even argue the above post. People can make their own conclusions, arguing anything with you is a waste of my time. You and me have nothing to really discuss again, ever. There is no reasoning with you on any topic because your mind is literally broken. I've only now come to that conclusion. Arguing with you is like arguing with someone who has a mental illness, or in reverse, I'm the one with the mental illness and your the norm. What is absolutely true is we can't agree on literally anything.

Don't engage me again, I don't want to catch what you have by accident.

That's the kind of response you get from Wil. You point out that he is linking to racist, white supremacist apologist sites and he replies that he is deeply worried for you.

There never is any content. It's just insults, because he is intellectually incapable of the back and forth discussion that anyone actually wanting to engage in honest conversation has. It never, ever happens. It is just insults.

Wil, we cannot agree on anything because I try and source everything from legitimate sources. You respond with white nationalist posts, anonymous forum posts and radical christian websites.
Here is another excerpt from a site Wil used as a citation when in a previous argument with me:
Now, apparently I am the one with a "mental disorder" because I link to The Atlantic and The New York Times while he feeds me that garbage. Literally earlier today I offered you $200 if you could prove that you lie less often than I do. You declined, I wonder why!?!

Ok, real talk, if the post below is at all serious I'm actually somewhat worried now. Can somebody who knows wil IRL contact him and check on his general mental health?

I'm totally ****ing serious here. The delusion in the post below reads much different than the standard lolwil delusions.