Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Welcome wil318466! Welcome wil318466!

07-31-2015 , 09:07 PM
Dudes, there's no way NC Flounce is thekid345. Not even close.
07-31-2015 , 09:10 PM
And your reasoning is?
07-31-2015 , 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
And your reasoning is?
Well, in the end, us outside users are only guessing. Even the Admins are guessing in the end... as IP/MAC id/bans aren't really hard to spoof or circumvent.

The dude in question has consistently claimed he ain't thekid345, he's given particular evidence regarding posting styles (which hasn't been disputed), the time line doesn't really add up, and we have that pesky fact that nobody who is in a position to know has claimed there is any IP/MAC connection.
07-31-2015 , 09:42 PM
On the other hand, low key is too clever and one of the trollies is bewildered
07-31-2015 , 09:43 PM
I don't think you've been paying very close attention.

@ MD
07-31-2015 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
I don't think you've been paying very close attention.

@ MD
No, I haven't. Maybe I'm wrong.

I *believe* that thekid345 had several gimmicks, and had even been outed as playing sock-puppet with himself. I know he had a 'distinct style', so to speak... but I'll admit I've never read the threads he posted in. I *believe* he was subject to Admin level scrutiny regarding IP/MAC issues.

So, it all really doesn't add up. Is the 'distinct style' really evident? I'll admit IDK... but I've never seen anyone seriously compare them. More importantly, if thekid345 is technically capable of making IP/MAC proof gimmicks... why only this one? What about the others before and after?
07-31-2015 , 10:18 PM
The style is distinct, but even more so is the narrow range of subject matter. And yes, there are others, before and after. Which makes it extra sad to think of how much time he spends setting up proxies.
08-01-2015 , 12:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
Whenever you last had to log in to this site, and you were typing in "Spanktehbadwookie", did you ever stop to think "Hey my username is a joke about sexual degradation" or did you just keep mashing buttons?
And we all know what "blade" is a euphemism for.
08-01-2015 , 01:11 AM
Am I getting counter-trolled? Brand new poster makes a beeline to the Israel thread to talk about gamblor using the same speech affectations as thekid? Even if it's not thekid, it's obviously some other snap-banworthy troll.

idk it the mods have some rule about not banning new accounts, but even if he's hiding behind seven boxxies, we all know who this guy is.
08-01-2015 , 01:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
No, that would just be a continuation of you doing all the work. Perhaps you should learn how trolling is scored.
I have no idea how trolling is scored. I bet TheKid doesn't either, cause he's pretty crappy at it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Kind of surprised that an obvious thekid gimmick wasn't insta-banned, but the modding here always perplexes me.
You're wrong about me being TheKid, so take a moment and think what that would mean. Assume i'm not him, why did you decide I am? Did you even try to compare "NC Flounce" with the multitude of TheKid accounts he's made?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
to be fair, i recognized him immediately and pointed it out, over and over again

but i've always been too clever for my own good

and, y'know, the lack of power to ban new accounts
Sorry man, i'm not TheKid, you didn't recognize TheKid immediately, you made an error immediately, and you've been repeating that error repeatedly, while patting yourself on the back for it. Amusing, and like with Trolly McTrollson, if you're so sure of yourself, but have been wrong all along, you might want to reevaluate your "cleverness".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Dudes, there's no way NC Flounce is thekid345. Not even close.
I would hope by now its obvious. He was such a monotone, robotic bore. I like to think i'm a little more... animated, to say the least? Also, punctuation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
The style is distinct, but even more so is the narrow range of subject matter. And yes, there are others, before and after. Which makes it extra sad to think of how much time he spends setting up proxies.
My writing style is nothing like TheKid's. You haven't been paying attention. Subject matter you're right though- we had interest in similar topics, which is why I was so familiar with his work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
I *believe* that thekid345 had several gimmicks, and had even been outed as playing sock-puppet with himself. I know he had a 'distinct style', so to speak... but I'll admit I've never read the threads he posted in. I *believe* he was subject to Admin level scrutiny regarding IP/MAC issues.

So, it all really doesn't add up. Is the 'distinct style' really evident? I'll admit IDK... but I've never seen anyone seriously compare them. More importantly, if thekid345 is technically capable of making IP/MAC proof gimmicks... why only this one? What about the others before and after?
TheKid would argue in RGT with one of his first multi-accounts "FreedomFighter", not sure if that one is banned yet, probably long gone. Mods have already pointed out that TheKid made like 10 accounts immediately after "TheKid345" was banned, they all had the same IP as far as I know, I think Wookie has been the one banning his alts though I think he made a few posts in PU as well. I would assume by now he's IP banned and has finally figured out the use of proxies to make his new accounts... and all of his accounts have been very singular in purpose and very quickly banned thereafter.

I'm just not TheKid, but, who cares at this point?
08-01-2015 , 08:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC Flounce
I have no idea how trolling is scored. I bet TheKid doesn't either, cause he's pretty crappy at it.



You're wrong about me being TheKid, so take a moment and think what that would mean. Assume i'm not him, why did you decide I am? Did you even try to compare "NC Flounce" with the multitude of TheKid accounts he's made?



Sorry man, i'm not TheKid, you didn't recognize TheKid immediately, you made an error immediately, and you've been repeating that error repeatedly, while patting yourself on the back for it. Amusing, and like with Trolly McTrollson, if you're so sure of yourself, but have been wrong all along, you might want to reevaluate your "cleverness".



I would hope by now its obvious. He was such a monotone, robotic bore. I like to think i'm a little more... animated, to say the least? Also, punctuation.



My writing style is nothing like TheKid's. You haven't been paying attention. Subject matter you're right though- we had interest in similar topics, which is why I was so familiar with his work.



TheKid would argue in RGT with one of his first multi-accounts "FreedomFighter", not sure if that one is banned yet, probably long gone. Mods have already pointed out that TheKid made like 10 accounts immediately after "TheKid345" was banned, they all had the same IP as far as I know, I think Wookie has been the one banning his alts though I think he made a few posts in PU as well. I would assume by now he's IP banned and has finally figured out the use of proxies to make his new accounts... and all of his accounts have been very singular in purpose and very quickly banned thereafter.

I'm just not TheKid, but, who cares at this point?
You're definitely thekid.
08-01-2015 , 10:03 AM
No one uses thekid's name more Han thekid himself
08-01-2015 , 12:37 PM
Hey guys, I'm not thekid and I totally don't care that you think I am so here's a novel's worth of words explaining how I'm not him.
08-01-2015 , 12:37 PM
Also, this is Wil's thread, try to have some respect.
08-01-2015 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC Flounce
You know who else had something against blowjobs? Thekid345.
Yes, you spoke strongly against those *****. Now you're stuck going down this road.
08-01-2015 , 05:05 PM
Sorry for stealing your spotlight, Wil! I'm still not TheKid345. Mods are smart enough to differentiate between the two of us so I guess RJoe is right, doesn't really matter who thinks I am.

Formula I have no problem with BlowJ's, i'm all for em. Cunnilingus however, ... pure evil.
08-01-2015 , 06:42 PM
Tell us more about how you are a different person. Be detailed.
08-01-2015 , 06:53 PM
It's a lowkey gimmick account of the NC Flounce account being a thekid gimmick account

If it isn't, its should be so I'm sticking with that.
08-01-2015 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
It's a lowkey gimmick account of the NC Flounce account being a thekid gimmick account

If it isn't, its should be so I'm sticking with that.
There is beauty in treating a gimmick like it's not a gimmick to be found.
08-01-2015 , 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
Whenever you last had to log in to this site, and you were typing in "Spanktehbadwookie", did you ever stop to think "Hey my username is a joke about sexual degradation" or did you just keep mashing buttons?
You think a screenname is a verb? You think spanking is only done for sexual degradation? You mashed buttons too????
08-02-2015 , 02:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Tell us more about how you are a different person. Be detailed.
I'm not TheKid, I talk more different than him do.
08-02-2015 , 06:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
There is beauty in treating a gimmick like it's not a gimmick to be found.
showing the makers label as we call it over here.

but lets look at some of the politics standard evidence we can make up:

Low key has boasted of his many 2+2 accounts
He has some vague idea about computers
He has loads of spare time
He may have a mischievous sense of humour (ok I know this is v.weak)
NC comes flouncing in to denounce thekid
NC is obviously a gimmick of some sort
NC looks a bit like thekid
NC looks too clever a gimmick to be thekid
NC is playing with the kids
Low key appears to know something.

Obviously this amounts to diddly squat but even so it's clearly low key.
08-02-2015 , 08:42 AM
Who was the guy who said he could ID kid gimmicks with startling accuracy based on a small sample due to some undisclosed writing style tell? Zikzak?
08-02-2015 , 09:39 AM
Not me. Yet another one of his accounts imo.
08-02-2015 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Who was the guy who said he could ID kid gimmicks with startling accuracy based on a small sample due to some undisclosed writing style tell? Zikzak?
I think it was Suzzer.

      
m