Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters? Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters?

10-08-2015 , 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
I'm not the simpleton crying because I get called out for pedo-apologia. I'm sure Nambla appreciates your membership.
Lol you guys are the best. And even though nobody (including you) is crying, you are in fact a simpleton. Buddayy.
10-08-2015 , 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Just to be clear, do you think I accused you of supporting Yak?
Dont you hate those dreaded people supporting the acceptance and treatment of mentally ill people! Darn them!
10-08-2015 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Just to be clear, do you think I accused you of supporting Yak?

If we are going to start clearing things up, that would not be the place I'd start.

It is clear you chose to post spank, exactly when is kind of besides the point due to the chronic nature of the spank posting.


Though we could mark starting a point by a thread I created and you posted in around the end of August 2014. The relationship between the topic of a certain thread and why you post spank makes for suitable irony and contribution of knowledge on the matter of getting things clarified from my viewpoint. Good luck!
10-08-2015 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
Dont you hate those dreaded people supporting the acceptance and treatment of mentally ill people! Darn them!

Homosexuality is not an illness of the body or mind. If your revisionist statement is that we should treat pedophilia like a clinical disorder rather than a crime, you are still far away from any notion of relevance with a child's appearance of consent.
10-08-2015 , 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Homosexuality is not an illness of the body or mind. If your revisionist statement is that we should treat pedophilia like a clinical disorder rather than a crime, you are still far away from any notion of relevance with a child's appearance of consent.
Luckily you haven't read a word of what I have posted. I guess this is the moment where I laugh and point at you, something that must happen a lot in these corners.

Last edited by Yakmelk; 10-08-2015 at 01:23 PM. Reason: Because pedophilia isn't either BUDDAYYY
10-08-2015 , 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
If we are going to start clearing things up, that would not be the place I'd start.

It is clear you chose to post spank, exactly when is kind of besides the point due to the chronic nature of the spank posting.


Though we could mark starting a point by a thread I created and you posted in around the end of August 2014. The relationship between the topic of a certain thread and why you post spank makes for suitable irony and contribution of knowledge on the matter of getting things clarified from my viewpoint. Good luck!
OK, you're doubling down on stupid, got it. Once again, thanks for controlling your spammy impulses when asked to, it's the only way you make this a better place.
10-08-2015 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
Luckily you haven't read a word of what I have posted. I guess this is the moment where I laugh and point at you, something that must happen a lot in these corners.
So you are saying the quote posted in this thread has been altered from your original post?

If so you should recognize that it doesn't change my response one bit.

If an observable reason exists to interpret the straightforward opinion offered in that quote a different way, my eyes are available to look.
10-08-2015 , 01:30 PM
No I'm saying you either haven't read it or are unable to correctly read it. If I were interested in discussing it with you I'd do so, however, I have read quite some of your posts so I have no interest in that whatsoever. Not only that but apparently this thread isn't for that so the only correct response would be "lol u".
10-08-2015 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
OK, you're doubling down on stupid, got it. Once again, thanks for controlling your spammy impulses when asked to, it's the only way you make this a better place.

There is your conspiracy theory rearing it's ugly head. You even seem to lose control a bit when confronted enough, just like a control freak.

I send my warmest regards you are able to keep a lid things while trying to manhandle lies across an event horizon of truth.

Even better, If you just gave up, surrendered the attempts to repeat lies into truth, you wouldn't be burdened anymore by the pain of running headlong into your own ass.

Clearly, you believe in your own control fantasies, so it may difficult for you to give up. I will keep doing my best to make it easier for you.
10-08-2015 , 01:39 PM
I love how Yak's said something clearly ridiculous, but there's still back and forths between Chez/Spank and "The Kids" (That's just for Chez).
10-08-2015 , 01:46 PM
Yak, as someone said already, this is clearly not the thread to discuss such a topic. It is a thread for ****ting on people and various other forms of sexual debauchery. As you've pointed out, P is also not a good place for it. Your in-your-face unapologetic style of writing about cringeworthy topics fits well in OOT, and probably SMP if you can keep up with Zeno.

Edit: unless you're just trying to troll the trolls, which can be great fun too
10-08-2015 , 01:47 PM
Surprising that noted anti-feminist, pro-black face poster yak is also pro-sleeping with thirteen year old girls
10-08-2015 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
I love how Yak's said something clearly ridiculous, but there's still back and forths between Chez/Spank and "The Kids" (That's just for Chez).
Thanks JJ. lol @ you

I would chip in on the more serious stuff but need a few hours to forget that this thread is just for pointing and laughing.
10-08-2015 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Yak, as someone said already, this is clearly not the thread to discuss such a topic. It is a thread for ****ting on people and various other forms of sexual debauchery. As you've pointed out, P is also not a good place for it. Your in-your-face unapologetic style of writing about cringeworthy topics fits well in OOT, and probably SMP if you can keep up with Zeno.

Edit: unless you're just trying to troll the trolls, which can be great fun too

If yak has corrected the justification to exploit children and the connection between pedophilia and homosexuality, then he should make a thread about it here in unchained where we can talk plain and frankly as we want without interference from authority, in theory.
10-08-2015 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib
Surprising that noted anti-feminist, pro-black face poster yak is also pro-sleeping with thirteen year old girls
If with pro blackface you mean black peet then you're completely right (and extremely wrong about the comparison). Idgaf about feminists except for the ones who are detrimental to the cause and I dont think sleeping with 13 year old girls is a very good idea. At least I don't feel like its necessary for me to switch usernames every now and then because of the bile that comes out of my keyboard. BUDDAAYYY.

And thanks for the advice Foldn, I'm giving this whole PU LCish thread thing a try for a bit to see where it heads. FWIW I respect kerowo for modding this forum, it probably aint easy.

@spank
I'm not a masochistic fella so I'm not interested in discussing it at lengths with this crowd.
10-08-2015 , 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib
Surprising that noted anti-feminist, pro-black face poster yak is also pro-sleeping with thirteen year old girls
Or that he was then recruited to join SMP by a drunk driving rapist.
10-08-2015 , 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
And thanks for the advice Foldn, I'm giving this whole PU LCish thread thing a try for a bit to see where it heads. FWIW I respect kerowo for modding this forum, it probably aint easy.
It sure ain't easy but I manage to respect him as well
10-08-2015 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
I love how Yak's said something clearly ridiculous, but there's still back and forths between Chez/Spank and "The Kids" (That's just for Chez).
You, of all people, have an inside view on how it works.

Party A (kerowo) expresses an opinion about Party B (spank).

Party B responds.

If Party A's opinion is half-assed and stupid, they are probably not going to like Party B's response, if it is full-assed and intelligent.

When Party A attempts to support a stupid opinion with even more stupidity, they create lasting stupidity and become stupefying.

The more stupidity Party A creates, the more opportunity granted to Party B to correct the stupefying errors in response.

Party A essential creates a direct path/feedback loop between their own head and their own ass; and then chooses to repeatedly walk down it. Choosing to stop is the only way to end the cycle of Party A repeatedly stabbing themselves in the butt with their head.


10-08-2015 , 03:34 PM
Did yak compare being a child molestor with someone having depression, or did I read that wrong?
10-08-2015 , 03:38 PM
At least he didn't go to the effort to find a clean version of that stupid gif.
10-08-2015 , 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
Did yak compare being a child molestor with someone having depression, or did I read that wrong?
Im pretty sure I could post the lyrics to Yellow Submarine and you would be able to read me being a women hating child rapist into that so good luck with the whole comprehension thing.
10-08-2015 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
And anyway, wouldn't that be more like Indian giver, than welcher?

Maybe just calling someone a cheat or a thief, but that loses some of the meaning.
Indian giver is a pretty racist term imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
Exactly and the fun part is one may be able to do so much earlier then someone else. Meaning a minor could easily consent to sex and some of age are still unable to consent (in a non legal interpretation of the word consent). Pedophilia has some different flavors as well, the mental being of pedophilia should be as accepted as homosexuality whereas mental problems being at the source of someones pedolike behaviour should be as accepted as a clinical depression is. Someone ****ing a child which they shouldn't **** according to the law they fall under should be put in jail and probably treated. Nuances are like condoms, they **** everything up.
Yeah this post is just ****ing weird and ****ed up.
10-08-2015 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
Indian giver is a pretty racist term imo.
Yeah, of course it is
10-08-2015 , 05:09 PM
Oh look, it's Yakmelk being an absolute garbage person. Really shocking.
10-08-2015 , 05:19 PM
Hey at least Im not you so I got that going for me. Loldids.

      
m