Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Does Whining About Political Correctness in a Racism Debate Correlate to Being a Racist? Does Whining About Political Correctness in a Racism Debate Correlate to Being a Racist?

10-02-2014 , 06:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Do you tell people about your Serena Williams/birth control for Hispanics/rap music opinions?
Yeah, all the time. You think I save my opinions for the internet only? lol. We must live in different worlds, Fly. We discuss this kind of stuff quite often.
10-02-2014 , 07:22 AM
You're goddamn right we live in different worlds, and don't you EVER forget that.
10-02-2014 , 07:24 AM
LOL "I tell my friends about how rap music is a cause of black criminal pathology and THEY never call me racist, there must be something wrong with all of you for thinking so"

I think you might be overlooking an explanation!
10-02-2014 , 07:30 AM
To callback to Chris Rock here(what you want, a cookie?), wil, it's pretty transparent what the deal is with all this ****.

You operate, with all these opinions on race and class(which are interwined, ldo), as some sort of weird self-esteem thing. You want validation and praise for not having a kid until your 30s, you want validation and praise for not dancing black, you want validation and praise for not listening to any music with a decent ****ing bass line, but more than all of that, you want an excuse to look down on the people who do violate your rules.

So that girl you know who got knocked up can't just be a ****ing human being who made a bad decision in her best attempt to live her life, a discussion about the minimum wage ends up being about the MORAL FAILINGS of everyone who didn't simply get an MBA and find a finance job if they didn't want to be poor anymore, etc.

You're about 5'7" of dog**** in a leather sack, and your daughter will make the world a worse place through word and deed.
10-02-2014 , 07:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
So, you seem to have some experience. Would you feel comfortable walking your wife or daughter through a group of men who appear to be in a street gang, regardless of race? You wouldn't consider taking an alternate route?
I'd like to see if you can concoct a more loaded hypothetical scenario before I answer. Is it late at night? Is my wife wearing expensive jewelry? Are we in the middle of The Purge? Am I wearing a sandwich board like Bruce Willis in Die Hard 3?
10-02-2014 , 08:03 AM
10-02-2014 , 08:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
You operate, with all these opinions on race and class(which are interwined, ldo), as some sort of weird self-esteem thing. You want validation and praise for not having a kid until your 30s, you want validation and praise for not dancing black, you want validation and praise for not listening to any music with a decent ****ing bass line, but more than all of that, you want an excuse to look down on the people who do violate your rules.

So that girl you know who got knocked up can't just be a ****ing human being who made a bad decision in her best attempt to live her life, a discussion about the minimum wage ends up being about the MORAL FAILINGS of everyone who didn't simply get an MBA and find a finance job if they didn't want to be poor anymore, etc.

You're about 5'7" of dog**** in a leather sack, and your daughter will make the world a worse place through word and deed.
Lol where do you even get this **** from? You must have a vivid imagination. Yeah I didn't have a kid when I didn't feel ready, so what? I don't dance, period, and I don't feel as if I look down on people. I can be critical about people making stupid ass decisions when they know better, I'll admit that.

I'm 5'9, by the way.
10-02-2014 , 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
I'd like to see if you can concoct a more loaded hypothetical scenario before I answer. Is it late at night? Is my wife wearing expensive jewelry? Are we in the middle of The Purge? Am I wearing a sandwich board like Bruce Willis in Die Hard 3?
Choose whatever scenario you like, but if your choice is to walk through the crowd alone with cheeks clenched to keep up with your good ideals, I think you're doing it wrong.
10-02-2014 , 09:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Choose whatever scenario you like, but if your choice is to walk through the crowd alone with cheeks clenched to keep up with your good ideals, I think you're doing it wrong.
Its the 'edge phenomena' objection. Applied wrongly on occasions but even when applied correctly its awkward because all the interesting bits are on the edge.

There's a concern that can be legitimate that a meaningful conversation about anything a racist says might be pandering to racism. e.g. talking about situations where it might be reasonable to avoid people of any race panders to those who single out particular races to avoid in those situations.

Gets very silly when people start talking about it being safer to not avoid the situations because its shows fear but I assume they're really just trying to avoid pandering.
10-02-2014 , 09:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
the best selling video game of all time is simply about killing people as fast as you can over and over again for no reason
I assume you're talking about best selling franchise, but I really don't consider mushrooms and turtles to be 'people' per se, and saving the princess is a noble purpose anyway.
10-02-2014 , 09:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnyCrash
When you see a group of youth wearing Thug Life clothes, it is meant to intimidate. They are emulating their rapper heros including the likes of Jay z. Who was wearing a gangsta hat while performing.
thug life is not about being gansta. Thug life is about being successful in the face of all of the barriers and adversity a black man in the US has to overcome. You shouldn't be intimidated by the success of young black men.
10-02-2014 , 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Its the 'edge phenomena' objection. Applied wrongly on occasions but even when applied correctly its awkward because all the interesting bits are on the edge.

There's a concern that can be legitimate that a meaningful conversation about anything a racist says might be pandering to racism. e.g. talking about situations where it might be reasonable to avoid people of any race panders to those who single out particular races to avoid in those situations.

Gets very silly when people start talking about it being safer to not avoid the situations because its shows fear but I assume they're really just trying to avoid pandering.
I get that. It's why it doesn't tick me off too much when typically decent posters like zikzak start piling on with the trolls. I'm gathering many here simply don't think any meaningful conversation can possibly come out of this. I disagree quite a bit and wish they didn't derive such pleasure poking at people they look down on.
10-02-2014 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
I get that. It's why it doesn't tick me off too much when typically decent posters like zikzak start piling on with the trolls. I'm gathering many here simply don't think any meaningful conversation can possibly come out of this.
Meaningful conversation can come out of it but that doesn't mean it always should. 'when to cross the street' seems pretty dull to me but the influence of culture is interesting and well worth a sensible discussion. Maybe its the wrong place for such topics.

Quote:
I disagree quite a bit and wish they didn't derive such pleasure poking at people they look down on.
I would prefer that as well, especially as some over-trust their judgement so much. Can't say I'm never guilty though.
10-02-2014 , 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
I'm gathering many here simply don't think any meaningful conversation can possibly come out of this. I disagree quite a bit and wish they didn't derive such pleasure poking at people they look down on.
Then ignore them (us?) and have the meaningful conversation you want. It's funny that you spend all this time trying to convince people there's this meaningful conversation that could be had - instead of HAVING that conversation.
10-02-2014 , 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Choose whatever scenario you like, but if your choice is to walk through the crowd alone with cheeks clenched to keep up with your good ideals, I think you're doing it wrong.
The trick is to unclench and smile from the good feeling that causes.
10-02-2014 , 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
Then ignore them (us?) and have the meaningful conversation you want. It's funny that you spend all this time trying to convince people there's this meaningful conversation that could be had - instead of HAVING that conversation.

Great advice. Mat made that point as well. I'm learning to do it, but as you can see not everyone is very good at ignoring insults.
10-02-2014 , 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianNit
On the one hand, this seems like bait to get someone to call you a nerd in the least flattering manner. On the other hand, I'm just dying to see someone take a stab at fitting posters to character alignments.
Who are the chaotic evil posters?
10-02-2014 , 10:30 AM
Avoid projects named "the jungle". Problem solved.

Tips I Learned from Training Day.
10-02-2014 , 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Who are the chaotic evil posters?
This sounds like an alignment in an fantasy RPG.
10-02-2014 , 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Great advice.
It would be valid if it was a simple them and us but that's not the case. Its generally unclear which points are valid until they are discussed and it can make the conversation almost impossible.

Ironically conflating common concepts is a good example of disrupting a discussion in a way that can't easily be ignored. Its a lot of work to realise they are doing it and even once you know there's still crucial information missing.
10-02-2014 , 10:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
To callback to Chris Rock here(what you want, a cookie?), wil, it's pretty transparent what the deal is with all this ****.

You operate, with all these opinions on race and class(which are interwined, ldo), as some sort of weird self-esteem thing. You want validation and praise for not having a kid until your 30s, you want validation and praise for not dancing black, you want validation and praise for not listening to any music with a decent ****ing bass line, but more than all of that, you want an excuse to look down on the people who do violate your rules.

So that girl you know who got knocked up can't just be a ****ing human being who made a bad decision in her best attempt to live her life, a discussion about the minimum wage ends up being about the MORAL FAILINGS of everyone who didn't simply get an MBA and find a finance job if they didn't want to be poor anymore, etc.

You're about 5'7" of dog**** in a leather sack, and your daughter will make the world a worse place through word and deed.
10-02-2014 , 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
It would be valid if it was a simple them and us but that's not the case. Its generally unclear which points are valid until they are discussed and it can make the conversation almost impossible.

Ironically conflating common concepts is a good example of disrupting a discussion in a way that can't easily be ignored. Its a lot of work to realise they are doing it and even once you know there's still crucial information missing.
For sure. Let's face it, even in the best, most civil environments discussing highly controversial issues can be tough. It's nearly impossible here. Another thing I'd advise new posters arriving here is to lurk for a good long time (is that in the sticky?) to get used to the regs personalities. Then don't post anything controversial for a good while until you've been accepted. I noticed there was pretty good, thoughtful discussion in the Atlanta Hawks racism thread between many of the regs. I mostly stayed away to keep it from tanking.
10-02-2014 , 11:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
This sounds like an alignment in an fantasy RPG.
It is and that's the joke. One of nine alignments from older editions of D&D. It can be an interesting discussion vehicle for moral viewpoints, when not used to determine a character's behavior in a given situation.

Hey, I apologize for my seriously harsh tone and choice of towards you previously ITT.
10-02-2014 , 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
It would be valid if it was a simple them and us but that's not the case. Its generally unclear which points are valid until they are discussed and it can make the conversation almost impossible.
Its pretty ****ing simple. If person A and B are talking and you think B isn't taking A seriously or is belittling their point - just reply to A and ignore B.

Some people are doing a lot of talking to B about how mean they're being to A and how they ruin the conversation.
10-02-2014 , 11:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Another thing I'd advise new posters arriving here is to lurk for a good long time (is that in the sticky?) to get used to the regs personalities.
No, because its stupid. I'm not going to advise anyone to not participate. If their participation causes them to get butthurt - it would probably happen anyway even if they waited a couple of weeks.

That's not to say people shouldn't cut new people some slack. But that's a different argument.

      
m