Quote:
Originally Posted by Pee Wee
Now i'll admit they take ages to incorporate changes that benefit their players, the statement you made is just pure ignorance. WPN does so much to give back to their players in the form of promotions its not even debatable. The site you should be making that statement about is bovada, they are raking the hell out of their whole player base and promotions are trash (unless you consider 1-2% rakeback promotions then ok whatever).
+1.
Huge wall of post upcoming. TL: DR - it's all basically examples of how WPN is responsive to customers, far more so than Bovada, and that Zecko needs to chill out making these claims, which I suspect is because he doesn't like their late reg policy and hasn't been directly responded to by WPN.
Zecko, you're not new to the 2+2, but you seem to be relatively new to the network. I deposited just under a year ago, and there have been consistent, if slow, changes. WPN is cautious in making changes because, presumably because they don't want to "shock" their player base.
It's fine that you post suggestions about the changes you want. But making comments like that, that WPN doesn't care about its' customers because you don't like their late registration period is absurd. And when you think about it, increasing their intake of fees is generally indicative that, you know, people are willing to pay the fees to play those tournaments.
In fact, WPN is a pretty responsive network. Do you know how many times Bodog_Ice has responded to me, and "passed the suggestion on?" Pretty much every post I make. Do you know many times any of those changes were implemented? Exactly zero.
Out of every suggestion I made here, WTD didn't respond to all of them, though he did most. But he actually implemented some of the ideas that I suggested, if he thought they'd work. It's cool because we have a hands on tournament director here. Does he respond to everything? No. That doesn't mean he's not reading this and thinking about changes to make.
As an example, I suggested running AIOF tournaments that paid out 2 seats rather than one. He implemented it for a week or two, but then changed it - I guess that it reduced traffic. Either way my point is he saw an idea I had that he liked and implemented it directly and actually I think it only took a day or two. That't not indicative of a company that doesn't care about it's customers. That's indicative of a company that's willing to try out new suggestions from customers.
The fact that they aren't changing late registration isn't because they "don't care about their customers," it's because they don't have the player pools to do so and still offer good GTD tournaments. I am almost 100% sure that if their traffic tripled next week, they'd get rid of 3 hour late registration in an instant.
But WPN is realistic. They aren't going to make drastic changes all of the time, rather, they're making slow changes that they think will be the best to improve traffic.
Everybody has their own preferences, but you should know that being the loudest here doesn't make you're preferrences good business decisions for WPN. You especially lose credibility because you're saying things that just aren't true. There are not, as far as I can tell, many tournaments that allow you to register with 5bb outside of satellites and I think some turbos (The ONLY one I can think of, and I'm not sure, is the2.5K GTD on Sunday nights. Yet you've said it multiple times like it's the norm on WPN.
The thing is that virtually everyone agrees with you that there should be more options than 3 hour late registration. I LOVE 3 hour late registration on certain tournaments. But if the 2K GTD was 3 hour instead of 2 hour I'd never play. See what I mean?
It's like you're pushing a smear campaign, and making outlandish claims about WPN because you don't want them to have 3 hour late registration and are annoyed that nobody is addressing it. Funny thing is, even if they don't make the change, of course they're discussing it. When I first started here, WPN was significantly different. They've made lots of positive changes, but you've got to be patient. You can't expect them to cater to your preferences first, or even at all sometimes. Trust me, I tried to get them to change their payouts to less of the field. In that case, I was told that it wouldn't happen. Fine, then, I'm not going to claim that they don't care about their customers. Turns out what I wanted isn't the same as what they felt was best.
I don't like it, but I'm not going to claim they don't care about their customers, because FWIW, WPN has done a few things to keep my business over time. That's why I stick around. Not because they have the most liquidity or they have the biggest tournaments or whatever, because they don't, but because they are the MOST responsive to players.
That doesn't mean they implement everything for everyone. That doesn't mean they're always here answering questions (that are more like attacks than suggestions, IMO) but because they are constantly working to improve slowly. Just as one last example of this, they changed the 10K to 12.5K for a while and just ate up the overlays. After a while, when they realized it didn't help as much as they wanted it to, rather than immediately take it back down, they lowered rake. From 25+2.5, down to 28+2. Eventually they did have to move it down to 10K again, but they tried everything else first, and probably lost 1000s running that touranment in the last few months.
Not to mention the rakeback, the leaderboards, etc. Clearly WPN cares a lot about it's existing cusomers and it trying to get new players out there. If you don't think that's true, then I don't know what to tell you.
There's a huge difference between a poker room that has structures you don't like and isn't currently talking publicly about any changes and a company that doesn't care about its' customers. Trust me, Bovada responds publicly far more often than WPN. It also implements those changes significantly less often.