Quote:
Originally Posted by CastleFrank13
Pokerstars, Bodog
No, that's not true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CastleFrank13
If you would actually read you would know I only sent 3 tourney ids in even though a played more against those accounts. And I am not greedy I only sent in the ones I did not cash so stfu. Making me seem like the bad guy is so wrong. I am not the one ripping off other players or anyone else you pos. Answer this question you piece of garbage where did the funds go?
Yes I did see that you had only sent 3 IDs. You've said that you sent 3 games to them as a test. You haven't made any claims that you actually lost money in those games because of collusion.
And yes I saw that you only sent games that you lost. Is the site supposed to feel fortunate that you are not also asking for reimbusement for games that you won?
If the site were to pass the test and pay you for the 3 games that you are testing them with then I'm sure many more games would be submitted by you for even more cash. And I'm sure that you would post your success and encourage other players to get their piece of the pie. That simply isn't how these things work, ever.
The tone of your posts tells us a lot about you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllinNoRubbers
I am unfamiliar with how these issues are normally resolved. I do not claim to know how they are. but in my post I explain what I believe is a DECENT thing to do.
also, please name me a network that allows colluders to go on playing for months despite players reaching out with their concerns numerous times?
let me rephrase that. please name me a reputable network.
Reimbursements are made with confiscated funds. They are paid out in a triage type of way. The players who are most blatantly colluded against are given full reimbursements whereas the other players are given nada. No one ever gets something like a $1.27 reimbursement for a $10 DON. Doing that would obviously cause big problems.
When the Chinese players were playing on PokerStars, I was reimbursed for one of the games that I had played against them. I know exactly which game that was. It was absurdly blatant collusion. I wasn't reimbursed for any of the many other games that I had played with them at my table.
The posters in this subforum made things much more difficult by giving the colluders a heads-up in these forums. And if the colluders didn't read these forums the posters made sure that they knew about it by telling them in the chat box that they were being watched for collusion. I have little doubt that doing that made things very difficult for the site to gather incriminating stats against them.