Quote:
Originally Posted by CastleFrank13
Na he is just someone who feels the need to protect the network from what he perceives as negative attention. What he doesn't get is that I see a network that is failing to reach its full potential because of weak leadership. I actually believe WPN can grow to be maybe as big as #2 site behind PS but the standards that they hold themselves to is so low they hinder their own growth.
I don't really have to protect the network. Think what you want of Phil or anybody at WPN personally, but they seem to be the only ones with a brain in the industry now. Unless the poker climate changes in America it's going to be difficult for WPN to challenge Euro sites. It's going to take years to get there. There just aren't 10k people waiting to deposit on WPN.
Leaderboard case seems very clear. Accounts banned, doesn't move you up. Collusion in DoN's was basically unavoidable. TD shouldn't have to tell you that.
Angry_nun case is clear. Account not banned. If no refunds were issued, I'm very sure there is a reason for that. And no, you don't get to know why that is.
If you don't like that, then you don't have to use the service. I mean, Pokerstars let Zeejustin back on even after perma-ban and admitting he cheated. WPN seems to take alot of action in cases. And get no credit for it.