Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Player Feedback for NEW MTT schedule 2016!! Player Feedback for NEW MTT schedule 2016!!

01-06-2016 , 03:34 PM
Id play a 50k $50 buyin but itd be way better if it was 6max. Id like to see some 45 player turbo on demand sng that dont have late reg. once they fill they start.
01-06-2016 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winning_TD
Hi guys,

it is true that i was away and back now ready for action.

I did keep up to date with the thread and took some ideas.

I made the 1st draft but we are taking a little longer than expected to try and get it excellent.

I will say one thing at the moment and that is Sundays wont really be changing, however i will be adding a 50k $50 5 HR LR as i think that is a great tournament.

Once we have the final draft i will be publishing for feedback
Awesome about the 50 50k, great addition.Real shame there is no sunday night turbo added but oh well, a 50 1000 player GTD is awesome. Please don't delete the 50 5k (5pm)on sundays and allow both of these mtts to run. I really hope there are some good weekly and daily additions to the schedule, and removing/replacing under performing mtts (g160m comes to mind). Hope you guys considered making structures on SOME tournaments a little faster as well.

Saturday major please!

Quote:
Originally Posted by zombal
Id play a 50k $50 buyin but itd be way better if it was 6max. Id like to see some 45 player turbo on demand sng that dont have late reg. once they fill they start.
They, WONT run tho, ever. Some on Demands struggle to get 10 players (11+) what makes you think 45 people will reg to a sng above 5$? I doubt even more than a couple 5$ 45s would run and no way an 11+ would run. Sngs should eithier be on demand or MTTSNG (45/90/18), there isn't room for both. On demands are doing pretty well, even the 20s run often. 50 is the only buyin that struggles.

Last edited by Longstructures; 01-06-2016 at 05:21 PM.
01-06-2016 , 05:43 PM
I think everyone really hopes the adjustments you make include payouts/structures. I sorta feel this will get ignored. Hopefully not.
01-06-2016 , 05:59 PM
They, WONT run tho, ever. Some on Demands struggle to get 10 players (11+) what makes you think 45 people will reg to a sng above 5$? I doubt even more than a couple 5$ 45s would run and no way an 11+ would run. Sngs should eithier be on demand or MTTSNG (45/90/18), there isn't room for both. On demands are doing pretty well, even the 20s run often. 50 is the only buyin that struggles.[/QUOTE]

Ya thats true, but on sundays i could see the 5's and 10's buyin being popular with all the tilty players.

There should be another freebuy series too lol
01-06-2016 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winning_TD
I made the 1st draft but we are taking a little longer than expected to try and get it excellent.
This is a good thing, don't rush it. Last time you requested feedback and change the schedule, the results seemed positive but could have been even better. IMO the complaints about too many MTTs lasting too long needs to be addressed a bit more this time around (remember that complaint doesn't come from me, but the schedule does seem to be missing some variety in the late reg/levels.)
01-07-2016 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
There should be another freebuy series too lol
Please lord no. I have had the good fortune of not experiencing lag on WPN almost ever and I would like that to continue. The freebuy series however will destroy the overall playing exp on WPN day in dayout. The servers can not handle that amount of traffic. I understand the appeal of the series as it does add a lot of $ and liquidity into the mtt economy of WPN, however the servers simply can't handle 7k+ player freerolls all day.


Anyway I am like a kid waiting around for Christmas waiting for the new scheduale. Really would like to see some daily additions, simply more tournaments to play from 12pm-9pm of any buyin above $11.

Thank you Winning TD for all your work, please share your final draft ASAP. Gl everyone.

Last edited by Longstructures; 01-07-2016 at 12:26 PM.
01-09-2016 , 03:11 AM
What happens if you win more than one seat to a satellite? Do you get tournament dollars like stars if you win more than one seat? I assume you have to play that tournament if you win seat in and can't take tournament dollars?


Do ROW players bother with wpn? I have see the mtt here and why does every structure seem so long?
01-09-2016 , 01:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulyJames200x
What happens if you win more than one seat to a satellite? Do you get tournament dollars like stars if you win more than one seat? I assume you have to play that tournament if you win seat in and can't take tournament dollars?
You get cash$, not tournament dollars after winning more than one seat. You can't unreg from winning a satty once though.

Last edited by Longstructures; 01-09-2016 at 02:04 PM.
01-09-2016 , 05:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulyJames200x
What happens if you win more than one seat to a satellite? Do you get tournament dollars like stars if you win more than one seat? I assume you have to play that tournament if you win seat in and can't take tournament dollars?


Do ROW players bother with wpn? I have see the mtt here and why does every structure seem so long?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longstructures
You get cash$, not tournament dollars after winning more than one seat. You can't unreg from winning a satty once though.

You can however buy in with cash, bink the ticket and get cash for it, then unreg the tournament you bought in with cash for.
01-10-2016 , 02:24 AM
While it's true that a lot of mtts take way to long on WPN and the schedule has major holes in it, somehow the network manages to maintain healthy traffic day in day out. Sundays are great and players really come out hard all day/night. If the right adjustments to the schedule get made it will give players a reason to load WPN daily and stay around after a series like High Five.

Good job on the Mini series from 20-25 with a 420 420k, very unexpected (for me) and the series looks like some great sample tournaments for the new schedule. The only thing I did not see in the Mini Series is a SATURDAY 160-215 6max (ko or normal) at 5-7pm. Hope to see a similar tournament in the new schedule as Saturday is a high traffic day without any majors (just 109 15k).

Last edited by Longstructures; 01-10-2016 at 02:29 AM. Reason: build saturdays and they will come
01-10-2016 , 12:56 PM
payout the top 15% period......if you want to do 20% in your flagship sunday games that makes sense because of how many recs there are, but the 160 at night for example has alot of "pros" - pay 15%.....also i like hte structures - they are very slow but id rather have a more skillful tournament
01-10-2016 , 01:04 PM
Sunday morning not a single tournament works. Cant reg any mtt or open any mtt lobby. So looks like everything is canceld today. WELL DONE WPN.
01-10-2016 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longstructures
Sunday morning not a single tournament works. Cant reg any mtt or open any mtt lobby. So looks like everything is canceld today. WELL DONE WPN.
Just restart it if you haven't, that's worked for me literally every time.
01-10-2016 , 03:29 PM
Is there a reason why first all weekly HR sats were taken off the schedule and now all Sunday ones except for two, as well? They're needed, please put them back.
01-11-2016 , 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z06Fanatic1
payout the top 15% period......if you want to do 20% in your flagship sunday games that makes sense because of how many recs there are, but the 160 at night for example has alot of "pros" - pay 15%.....also i like hte structures - they are very slow but id rather have a more skillful tournament
The 15 min levels are unnecessary in online poker. 12 mins is fine. Plus they have too many unnecessary levels. The cream will rise to the top with a quicker structure.
01-11-2016 , 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfiiue4
The cream will rise to the top with a quicker structure.
I've always wondered why such high ROIs occurred in turbos.



Ever considered like a $50 or $100 Cage, could run them on like Monday to avoid diminishing the glamour of the 1k.

As much as I want to see awesome big/medium BIs, I think that the 50k is the step in the right direction. The network needs bigger lower BIs to attract the recreational player base.

Much respect Winning_TD and Thanks for everything.
01-11-2016 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfiiue4
The cream will rise to the top with a quicker structure.
Yeah, not true, not at all.
01-11-2016 , 05:05 PM
So has the $160 nightly at 8.20 been removed? I can't see it in the lobby.
Would be a shame if it has as I love that tournament and it pretty much always reaches its GT.
01-11-2016 , 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eatitraw
So has the $160 nightly at 8.20 been removed? I can't see it in the lobby.
Would be a shame if it has as I love that tournament and it pretty much always reaches its GT.
Woohoo, it's in the lobby again!
01-12-2016 , 12:46 AM
Are all the MTT's here still unlimited rebuy, unlimited reentry, 2+ hour late reg ?

Any freezeout options ?
01-12-2016 , 04:53 PM
There is no reason a 52 person tournament should pay out 12 players. That's far too many. It should be payout somewhere between 6 and 9 players at max. PLEASE tweek the payouts. They don't need to be super top heavy but no tournament should EVER payout more than 20% unless it's a satellite or something specific like that.
01-12-2016 , 05:02 PM
I know people disagree about this, but I personally like the higher number of payouts. There is a lot of +EV just before the bubble, and the chance of reaching the bubble increases proportionate to the number of payouts.
01-12-2016 , 05:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boney526
There is no reason a 52 person tournament should pay out 12 players. That's far too many. It should be payout somewhere between 6 and 9 players at max. PLEASE tweek the payouts. They don't need to be super top heavy but no tournament should EVER payout more than 20% unless it's a satellite or something specific like that.
9 players is good, 6 is not enough.

I think it's a short sighted view to want everything up top.
01-12-2016 , 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisp200
9 players is good, 6 is not enough.

I think it's a short sighted view to want everything up top.
Yeah, that's true, 9 is fine. Actually 8 is probably a lot better because there is no hand for hand.
01-12-2016 , 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boney526
There is no reason a 52 person tournament should pay out 12 players. That's far too many. It should be payout somewhere between 6 and 9 players at max. PLEASE tweek the payouts. They don't need to be super top heavy but no tournament should EVER payout more than 20% unless it's a satellite or something specific like that.
Are you talking about the $160 or something else now? Because I actually don't mind that pay out at all in this specific tourney as $160 is a bit of an investment for most people and the mtt itself is very reg infested and not super easy to beat. It's not like the first few prizes is a big deal anyway, it's not even 2x BI and it still leaves around 2600-3k for the winner, sometimes even more.

      
m