Hi Guys,

There are now Jackpot Satellites sats for the Million Dollar Sunday.

Please click the link for more info.

http://www.americascardroom.eu/onlin...llion-or-bust/

$12 tourn to win a $500 seat.....Sounds terrible

I dont know if that is a joke?

$12 for a 1/20k chance at $500....doesnt seem to appealing

Ok without me knowing they have already been put in the lobby. They are now running

The odds of all 3 players winning a $540 seat is 5 out of 1000 or every 1 in 200 games mathematically.

smh..didnt see the out of 1000 at first.
My apologies

The first one has already been won!!!

and 3 out of 100 and 3 out of 200 for the smaller prizes

Way better pay scale then the WSOP ones which even WPN has to openly admit they were a fail with the exception of the money the network banked from them.

I might actually come out of Jackpot Poker retirement to play a few of these.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000 simulations of 10000 games
Expected ROI (with rakeback/bonus/award): 3.3% (330 Buyins)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean 337.03
99% had ROI below 11.68% (1168 Buyins)
97.5% had ROI below 9.97% (997 Buyins)
95% had ROI below 8.78% (878 Buyins)
90% had ROI below 7.81% (781 Buyins)
80% had ROI below 5.97% (597 Buyins)
70% had ROI below 4.90% (490 Buyins)
60% had ROI below 4.01% (401 Buyins)
50% had ROI below 3.18% (318 Buyins)
40% had ROI below 2.43% (243 Buyins)
30% had ROI below 1.59% (159 Buyins)
20% had ROI below 0.69% (69 Buyins)
10% had ROI below -0.59% (-59 Buyins)
5% had ROI below -1.77% (-177 Buyins)
2.5% had ROI below -2.62% (-262 Buyins)
1% had ROI below -3.76% (-376 Buyins)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had a downswing greater than 123 buyins
97.5% had a downswing greater than 136 buyins
95% had a downswing greater than 145 buyins
90% had a downswing greater than 160 buyins
80% had a downswing greater than 182 buyins
70% had a downswing greater than 205 buyins
60% had a downswing greater than 224 buyins
50% had a downswing greater than 243 buyins
40% had a downswing greater than 263 buyins
30% had a downswing greater than 295 buyins
20% had a downswing greater than 331 buyins
10% had a downswing greater than 399 buyins
5% had a downswing greater than 459 buyins
2.5% had a downswing greater than 524 buyins
1% had a downswing greater than 589 buyins
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99% had a low point lower than -1 buyins
97.5% had a low point lower than -3 buyins
95% had a low point lower than -6 buyins
90% had a low point lower than -12 buyins
80% had a low point lower than -27 buyins
70% had a low point lower than -47 buyins
60% had a low point lower than -66 buyins
50% had a low point lower than -91 buyins
40% had a low point lower than -119 buyins
30% had a low point lower than -150 buyins
20% had a low point lower than -193 buyins
10% had a low point lower than -270 buyins
5% had a low point lower than -334 buyins
2.5% had a low point lower than -392 buyins
1% had a low point lower than -513 buyins

I think I did that right playing many tables didnt even look @ the #s yet, thats for 50 cev/game

$6 with 1/2 the freq of current would be alot busier imo

What would the win % be to achieve 3.3% ROI?

36.67 or 50 cev

First off, I have to agree with others who say that the dollar amount should be lowered.

Only other thing is that I really wish they didn't make everything except minimum prize all 3 win, but I probably sound like a broken record. IMO something like 2 in 1000 (instead of 5) all win a package, and 9 in 1000 would give out one package. Or something similar to that with second and 3rd getting tickets to whatever the biggest 215 is that day.

I realize it's already set I'm just saying what would make these more appealing to me. As is I probably won't be playing, maybe a couple the day of the event.

From those frequencies and payouts, I'm getting an average rake of 3%.

It is 3%. I see the website has a typo.

Oh, in that case, I'd still prefer if they had you play out the 72 and 108 prize pools, but at least the rake is good in accordance with the games. I will play a few more of these randomly, though.

PT4 not recognizing them correctly obviously.

Thanks for bringing these, it's a bit late but better than never! I'll definitely check them out sometime at night and probably more intensively next weekend.

I think PT4 will start recognizing them pretty soon, especially if you send HHs via a support ticket at their site.

The $12 buy-in looks like a good compromise: if it were significantly lower, I wouldn't bother to play them (as someone who would normally play $10 JPTs), but if it were higher, recreational players wouldn't flock.

I think the buyin amount is a good amount for odds/buyin level.

I think that for the next milly, these should be released a little earlier to help build the player pool with more players.

I think they should reappear exactly when the date of the next milly becomes known and be a continuous promotion in general

$36 Milly sats in the Jackpot lobby, with the most "grindable" structure yet!

what happens if you win multiple tickets?

You get cash if you're already registered for the event.