Jackpot Poker Not in S&C this week. - Page 4 - Winning Poker Network -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

I agree and not just the $40s. Whenever I play after even midnight EST I will get the same opponents in multiple games and the later it gets this gets worse along with waiting for them to fill.

05-12-2015 , 08:29 AM

#78

ibolxijuf

grinder

Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 521

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeerBottlez

I agree and not just the $40s. Whenever I play after even midnight EST I will get the same opponents in multiple games and the later it gets this gets worse along with waiting for them to fill.

+1
wouldve cashed for sure last 2 weeks if was inc in snc.
tired of seeing beerbottlez in 80% of my late night games lol

05-14-2015 , 01:26 PM

#79

slayerv1fanfan

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 128

Do It

05-14-2015 , 11:58 PM

#80

futurized

centurion

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 192

Quote:

Originally Posted by WPN Rep

I'll have an update inside the next couple days.

its been few days how about that update. its 80% regs (in 40s) now and loading slower. if you dont give back some of that unfair 6% (in the 40s)
rake then your going to kill your games

Last edited by futurized; 05-15-2015 at 12:06 AM.

05-15-2015 , 12:02 AM

#81

futurized

centurion

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 192

i will add. or lower the rake to 5%( for the 40s). the player pool is way to tiny to sustain 6% rake, its pretty obv already

05-15-2015 , 12:23 AM

#82

SantaCruz

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 4,161

Wouldn't adding SnC cause a higher number of regs to play the games? Pretty much only the regs would benefit from SnC whereas the more casual players would only end up paying a little more rake due to not getting rakeback for their entire rake paid. Be careful what you wish for.

05-15-2015 , 12:38 AM

#83

futurized

centurion

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 192

Quote:

Originally Posted by SantaCruz

more regs ok if there is higher rakeback, and at this rate games only going to start with decent/ good regs. more regs mean more lower quality ones, which makes hourly in games better cause they pop faster. soon nobody will play these if they continue the way they are. people will move away to different games. stars reg playing here cause they think they are good, but in reality the games are so so so much less profitable then stars gamee. because spin wiz and huge player pool and 5%. 1% extra rake means you get 30% less roi with winning same number of chips

05-15-2015 , 12:43 AM

#84

futurized

centurion

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 192

or just lower rake. lol so something

05-15-2015 , 04:06 AM

#85

BeerBottlez

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 3,909

I would rather the rake be lower then having these added to SNC but since it's going to happen expect these games to get tougher but fill faster.

The fish pool isn't that big and late at night I will draw the same handful of players in practically any game I sit in.

Fish will play these selectively but there aren't enough on this network compared to the rakeback/snc/beast grinders that will mass table these games if SNC comes even close to blowing up as much as the CEO said it will in his last stream.

05-15-2015 , 11:47 AM

#86

cdfj

journeyman

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 227

lets be real here there's maybe 4-5 good regs and that's stretching it

05-15-2015 , 06:11 PM

#87

futurized

centurion

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 192

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdfj

lets be real here there's maybe 4-5 good regs and that's stretching it

ok who

05-15-2015 , 09:10 PM

#88

pokerNonymous

centurion

Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 167

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeerBottlez

This is exactly right. Any extra rakeback gained from these being added to S&C will by far be offset by the decreased game quality from all the extra grinders.

Even w/out any rake reduction, these games are probably much more beatable now than they would be if they were in S&C