Quote:
Originally Posted by misk
I'll just end by saying this: I'm happy to accept that you've looked into it and to track my games carefully going forward to see if I can find evidence. But I also would like to say that I've played ~1500 9 man regular SnGs on this site over the past few months and never had any complaints or concerns about seating being randomized. Then I started playing SnG 2.0s and noticed that over my first couple sessions that many of my tables had quite similar seating orders with the same regs being directly to my left/right. I posted about that non-confrontationally in this thread as soon as I noticed it:
That's from page 15 of this thread and was posted 10 days ago. BeerBottlez immediately responded that he was noticing the same thing.
WPN Rep actively solicited feedback from multi-tablers in this thread. Numerous players raised this same concern. Don't get so defensive when folks actually come with the feedback you've solicited.
When you originally posted about the seating I was seeing it too and agreed.
After playing a bunch more games I agree even more it's not random.
My request is that they look into this since enough of us have brought it to light. I didn't expect a fix in a day or two but it's something I hoped they would look into because their have been times only one or maybe two mutli tablers would be at my table and I have one on my right and one on my left on all those tables.
Please
Winning_TD all we ask for is to have this looked into even if you were told the seating is random it's possible that it's not. Accidents happen in the coding or can always be improved. It's sort of like with Jackpots when they wouldn't sit the same guy at my table for more then a few games only that isn't as big of a deal in 9 mans but where we are seated can be.
Some people go about it posting in an assertive manner giving you more then you should take in where it clearly stresses you out. People also are trolling at times nit picking at things in a joking manner because of past fails and I'm sure it frustrates you/the network, but with serious concerns if enough people are seeing a potential issue it's worth having it looked into.
For now I say
Winning_TD you go have a few drinks or do something to get relaxation. A week off would be a long time and most people who say that might not post for a week but they will still read comments because they can't stay away, it's human nature.
A lot of people realize that many things are way out of your control, or if they don't realize it then they should but the people hate to be ignored as well.
I'm not saying you are doing that but maybe their are better ways to go about things such as creating a thread trying to get weekly updates on the status of the most common issues and questions people where you post them and immediately lock the thread so nobody can clutter it up.
This would be the go to where we can send a person who don't read 5 posts up to see their question has already been answered.