Game started at: 2017/8/10 4:57:44
Game ID: 978746741 75/150 $15 Hyper Turbo 6-Max, Table 1 (Hold'em)
Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: Thrash370 (2546).
Seat 3: ecuedac (51).
Seat 6: 1L0v3p0k3r (403).
Player Thrash370 ante (15)
Player ecuedac ante (15)
Player 1L0v3p0k3r ante (15)
Player Thrash370 has small blind (75)
Player ecuedac allin (36)
Player Thrash370 received a card.
Player Thrash370 received a card.
Player ecuedac received a card.
Player ecuedac received a card.
Player 1L0v3p0k3r received card: [Jc]
Player 1L0v3p0k3r received card: [5d]
Player 1L0v3p0k3r folds
Player Thrash370 folds
Uncalled bet (39) returned to Thrash370
Player ecuedac mucks cards
------ Summary ------
Pot: 117. Rake 0
Player Thrash370 does not show cards.Bets: 51. Collects: 0. Loses: 51.
*Player ecuedac mucks (does not show cards). Bets: 51. Collects: 117. Wins: 66.
Player 1L0v3p0k3r does not show cards.Bets: 15. Collects: 0. Loses: 15.
Game ended at: 2017/8/10 4:57:55

**the software shouldnt even allow this**

LOL wtf. You should probably bold ecuedac's actions to make it easier to read. Took me a minute to figure out what was up. That's a really weird situation.

It just our silly software in this situation where you have to click call even if you have the bb covered.

I know thrash personally and he plays so many tables he prob just saw and i will out the hand here 6 2 off and just insta folded without seeing the bb was all in.

It is something i know about and its not very often it happens but this will be something that is fixed in version 2

Clearly Thrash is to busy being a mod here to follow the action properly at his tables. But if op wishes to we can just add this to the growing pile of tin foil hat threads that take up to much space in this forum.

What is tinfoil hat about the OP? There is no claim, baseless or otherwise. The software should have played through the hand since the small blind had the big blinds all in anyway. As TD mentioned, that is wrong and is expected to be fixed the next version of the software.

Well for starters the thread title says so many things wrong here. This implies that there is more than just a software issue at play here. Also, the op says that the software shouldn't even allow that to happen meaning that the software should be a fail safe that prevents accidental folds and or collusion. This is how I read it and I could be wrong but I believe TD read it the same way, that is why he vouched for Thrash.

Well he wrote so many things wrong, not just this software bug is wrong. Sometimes I go into autopilot mode and i miss spots like this. Although I seldom miss that one it happens. It might have seemed like I wasn't playing many tables at what was like 4 am EST but I was actually multi-siting. It's why playing more tables drags down ROIs.

Edit: I ended up repeating Chopsy as I took too long to post

I could be wrong, I just saw the fold of a small blind less than the all in amount of the big blind. I also read the 'so many things wrong' comment as just a comment referring to a head scratching scenario, probably because I use the term often. Didn't come across as a 'collusion' thing and anyone that has been on this sub forum or wpn has seen thrash posting and likely sat at a table with him, too.

I may have been faster but your spelling is better

Been waiting for the "Thrash is a bot" thread for ages, at least now I have proof that I am in fact human and make human mistakes

I still think you are a bot that has just been programmed to make bad folds just so you appear to be human. Actually, I should make that the first post in the new and improved official tin foil hat thread!

ess his dee already, ok chopsy2?
never mentioned collusion, but since you bring it up..., YES! it does look bad.

I'm satisfied with the response.

So you see one isolated hand and you decide to make a thread about it? Why not post other hands the two accounts played together? If it looks bad then there should be others that you could post as evidence. So basically rather writing it off as a misclick you decide to cry wolf and drag Thrash though the mud. Do you even realize what someone reading your post might think? They might over react and come to the conclusion Thrash is a cheat. That is what happens with idiot post like yours, you potentially can harm someone's reputation.

i mentioned the software. you are the idiot that brought up collusion.
and yea, someones rep should be reason why i don't protect myself. good one

Meh while I would have preferred the post to say something like "I believe Thrash misclicked here but would still like an explanation" he did at least pick a controversial hand and posted it in a spot where i'm active to give a response. I do think at this point the bickering is muddying the waters away from the remaining issue that OP had with the hand

And you could have easily kept the account names between you and a rep. It would have served the same purpose and no one gets harmed in the process. But if you feel posting one isolated hand is the way to go about things good luck to you because it won't do you any good.

you seem to think i posted this thread to ruin rep. You are wrong.
I see now, thrash is on leader boards n such and i guess mods? here.
I knew none of this when i posted.
close the thread. my concerns are resolved.
my concerns were real though. I posted for my security and for no other reason.

this thread was changed into something it wasn't supposed to be thanks to chopsy2.
you are such a thrash groupie, yet all of your words have done the condemning.
learn to love your god, not make him look bad.

i don't think you posted to purposely ruin a persons reputation but unfortunately that is what can be the end result of a player outing screen names. Especially when something such as this can simply be explained as a misclick. And like I said you could have posted the hh without using the names and just given them to a rep via pm. Would that not have served the same purpose?