This needs to be implemented immediately, too. During peak hours, I see 4-8 people sitting on the waiting list for each and every table at a given stake. Waiting for an hour + in some cases. With that being a fact, there's absolutely no reason to let one player occupy a seat at every single table for that given stake. If they can play 7-10 tables profitably (ridiculous) then they can move up and play 4 at the next level. There is just not one valid reason for allowing players to play on that many tables at a time.

The other networks have table limits and this one should, too.

You try starting a new table? If you're waiting an hour to get onto an online table you are definitely doing it wrong.

And lol that you think it's ridiculous someone could play 7 tables profitably. OMG 7 tables?? How can one person think so fast??? Oh wait, it's only 7 tables. People 24 table profitably... get better so you can beat them or get used to having your money taken by people who think and play at a higher level than you.

Oh, and you want a valid reason people should be able to play that many tables? It makes sense for the network (more tables filled = more rake) and it makes sense for the individual players who want to increase their volume and winrate. We shouldn't all be limited to 4 tables just because you can't think fast enough to play more than that.

Ouch

So much hate

Leave america please

It's not like I went on a rant insulting the guy... I'm just trying to state the obvious to somebody who clearly doesn't understand this whole online poker thing and keeps making ridiculous posts across the forum.

Never going to happen on WPN. Their VIP program is designed for volume play and a 4 table cap is anathema to it.

He's on his 4th account now I think. The others were banned in years past. I now see this one is banned as well... it may only be a temp-ban though so...

--
Kahn

You have several options. Here are the top 2 that I recommend.


1. Start a new table.
2. Play at the other sites that restrict table max.

We need a world of poker with less limits instead of more.

High volume players are their bread and butter, it makes no sense for them nor the players.

"We need a world of poker with less limits instead of more."

^ Gospel.

With all the governturd interference, why on earth would we want more restrictions? No company exists for the small client/customer, they cater to their largest and most profitable base.

I myself went with #2 on that list. I am also a micros player who has successfully built a bankroll from a small deposit on every other US facing site. On WPN I've experienced the same thing a lot of guys in the micros have reported. There's just no way to win over the long run. WPN might be a good option if you can afford a large initial deposit and you're going to play at 25NL+ right off the bat but other than that, it's just a money trap.

When numerous people who are all winning at other sites (at higher stakes, too) all report doing nothing but losing here at 2nl, maybe it's time to not just bash them right off the bat and tell them they're not good. Maybe it's time to really look at *why* everyone in the micros is complaining about the same things.

lol 100% you are OP

No but I've seen you guys do this before. You're paranoid and think everyone is using multiple screen names. I promise you that not every single person who has come on here and complained about the micros is the OP. There's actually more than one person who's experienced the same thing on the same network.

I personally never got as upset as the OP did about these things. I saw what was what and just moved onto the other networks where winning in the micros is as easy as it should be. Why he doesn't do that, I don't know but that's not really the point. Rather than just laughing and shrugging these threads/posts off, maybe you guys could consider the possibility that legitimate winners on every other site simply cannot win here.

"Everyone" meaning you, the op. I don't understand why you, a losing 2nl player, think that the only way you could win on WPN is by having a "large initial deposit" (is $250 large? lol) to play 25nl. If you lose at 2nl why do you think you could beat 25nl?

You mean to you?

Super, then you don't need to be back in this forum complaining, do you?

Probably true, but you are, and you're insulting everyone's intelligence by pretending otherwise. Buh-bye!