I would have thought they would do Randy Orton vs AJ Styles, at some point, since that's a never been done before match that has potential but now he has the tag team titles with Wyatt, and is a heel now? (haven't kept track of Orton's face/heel alignment recently) so that is a bit of a pickle they got themselves going between now til WM. The only option, atm, is to run the Ellsworth/Ambrose saga dry for all of its worth, but no one really likes that option.

Of course, they could, you know, bring Nakamura to Smackdown for a brief while and give us Styles/Nakamura II at the rumble. I liked their Wrestle Kingdom match, but it was kinda hampered with Styles' back injury, the lack of a proper story/buildup, again due to the back injury, and two other matches being better, but I really think they can do better this time, if Styles is a bit more healthier than Wrestle Kingdom 10.

Can you imagine??? Just toss it in the garbage.

itll be taker/aj at rr then taker/cena at mania imo

I was wondering about Taker/AJ at WM. Can they really do Ambrose/AJ at WM again if you have the two other top faces on the brand facing each other? Maybe they should put them in a cage or something, but they don't do stuff like that at Mania anymore. Only use them for gimmick PPVs, not when they might actually make some sense.

Taker/AJ is what I want at WM ..... I wonder if AJ can bump enough for him to make it almost as good as the Michaels/Taker matches ..... maybe impossible just because of UT's age but seems like there's a good chance to pull off something great.

Obviously Cena vs Taker is $$$$$$$$$$$$$ so that's prob what they do.

^^ Cena vs Taker would have been better money if the streak was on the line. I wished they never broke the streak just for that. Cena/Taker with the streak would have gave WM an easy 100k people without question in attendance in Dallas.

Taker will win the rumble and face Smackdown champion James Ellsworth.