Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread

01-29-2017 , 11:18 PM
Holy **** Dolph's hair is fluffy.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:18 PM
Lol 24
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:18 PM
Rusev looks so ridiculous, lmao
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:18 PM
Looks like our dreams of Joe or Nakamura entering are all but dead
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:18 PM
Saving Goldberg, Bork and Taker all for the final 5 is really dumb.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkOneMore
8 spots left, HHH, Taker, Goldberg, Lesnar, Orton, who else is there?
Balor
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:19 PM
Are these boring, or Goldberg chants?
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:19 PM
Lesnar 27, Taker 28, Goldberg 29, Joe 30 would be fine with me (please no HHH?)
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:19 PM
this feels like one of those old school great era rumbles where 99% of the participants are people with stories going on and we get great interactions between people and stories develop
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:19 PM
Still no Brock or Goldberg or Taker.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT
If they go lights off for Taker's ring walk, how many people are going to enter before he gets to the ring?
Five, counting Jericho three times
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjosh
Rusev looks so ridiculous, lmao
I'd like to think that it's a tribute to post-WM VIII Virgil.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Are these boring, or Goldberg chants?
Definitely Goldberg.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Saving Goldberg, Bork and Taker all for the final 5 is really dumb.
It's not that stunning, I doubt Goldberg can perform for long in the rumble with so many entrants, and gotta have a Taker/Brock/Goldberg spot where they might all win, not much for them to do
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:20 PM
Feelin good about 26
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimHalpert
this feels like one of those old school great era rumbles where 99% of the participants are people with stories going on and we get great interactions between people and stories develop
I agree. With a few exceptions, the involvement of most of these guys seems to have more purpose than just to fill spots.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:20 PM
Niiiiice
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:21 PM
Hating this Rumble so far. I'm a couple minutes behind but leaving the big 3 for the last 5 or whatever spots is so ****ing bad.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:21 PM
So none of the announcers watched SD Tuesday where Bray hit Harper with Sister Abagail and left him lying in the ring?
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:21 PM
business is about to pick up
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:21 PM
oh ****

BROCK
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:22 PM
This means no Kurt Angle.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:22 PM
Goooood evens!
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:22 PM
"Eat, Sleep, Eliminate, Repeat"

Well, yeah, that usually follows eating...
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 11:22 PM
holy ****
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote

      
m